Using a Canon EOS-30D for deepsky?

On 17 May 2006 01:24:06 -0700, in uk.sci.astronomy ,
wrote:


Pete Lawrence wrote:

Rubbish - they are perfectly adequate. Of course more expensive lenses
(the plural of lens) will, on the whole deliver better results,

It just shows how knowledgeable you are about lens, that is not at all.

Its worth noting that Pete has a very honourable pedigree in
astrophotography.

Thanks for correcting my grammar anyhow.

Shame you didn't pay any attention tho!
--
Mark McIntyre

On 19 May 2006 01:01:36 -0700, in uk.sci.astronomy ,
wrote:

His images are mildly boring and yet so reassuring that mediocrity can
yield results.

Okay, you just made it into the pompous ****wit category.
*plonk*
--
Mark McIntyre

On 17 May 2006 02:53:35 -0700, in uk.sci.astronomy ,
wrote:

My point is that I have no vanity to titilate

Yeah? So why have you spent this entire thread showing off your
'cleverness' about lenses?
--
Mark McIntyre

Agreed. My apologies to you for having been rather heavy-handed in
judging your work and/or plainy dismissive of your postings here.

Regards

Andrea T.

P.S. This should sort Ian as well.