A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Uncompressed Opportunity Images



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #23  
Old February 1st 04, 05:13 PM
Joe Knapp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kenneth Chiu" wrote
Seems right, but they released a graph showing the daily data volume
returned by Spirit. which has exceeded 200MB/day.

See: http://tinyurl.com/338d9

Not sure of the explanation of how they can do that.


The label on the Y axis looks a bit more like "Mbits" to me
that "MB" or "Mbytes". It might have been more readable had
they used PNG/GIF.


Ah, you're right.

Joe


  #24  
Old February 1st 04, 05:14 PM
Greg Crinklaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joe Knapp wrote:
Seems right, but they released a graph showing the daily data volume
returned by Spirit. which has exceeded 200MB/day.

See: http://tinyurl.com/338d9


That really shows how important Odyssey is in getting the data back to
earth. It's so much nicer to build a rover to send data to an orbiting
spacecraft rather than directly home. I know that NASA wants to send an
orbiting communications satellite to facilitate future missions, but
there have been critics. Perhaps the MER success will help bolster the
idea.

Why does Odyssey send more data some days than others? It has to do
with the geometry of the passes. If the satellite passes directly
overhead they get a longer window to send data and more can be sent.


--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)

SkyTools Software for the Observer:
http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html

Skyhound Observing Pages:
http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html

To reply remove spleen

  #25  
Old February 1st 04, 05:14 PM
Tom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Joe Knapp" wrote:

Seems right, but they released a graph showing the daily data volume
returned by Spirit. which has exceeded 200MB/day.

See: http://tinyurl.com/338d9

Not sure of the explanation of how they can do that.


That graph shows megabits, as in 200 Mb or 25 MB.



  #26  
Old February 1st 04, 05:16 PM
Greg Crinklaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kenneth Chiu wrote:
The label on the Y axis looks a bit more like "Mbits" to me
that "MB" or "Mbytes". It might have been more readable had
they used PNG/GIF.


Yes, the culture is to report data in megabits rather than megabytes (a
factor of eight).


--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)

SkyTools Software for the Observer:
http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html

Skyhound Observing Pages:
http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html

To reply remove spleen

  #27  
Old February 1st 04, 06:35 PM
Peterson, David
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Answering by insulting and trying to make a fool of others you don't agree
with surely doesn't show
any sign of superior intelligence to understand science...
I didn't insult anyone but I get insulted by people like you, this just
shows your childish and
uneducated behaviour.


I believe you are insulting the hundreds of scientists and engineers
working on the MER project by questioning their integrity and
dedication to science. You are basically saying some of them are liars
with no proof at all.
  #28  
Old February 1st 04, 06:58 PM
David Nakamoto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And as one of those engineers from JPL, I will say it again, knowing that
the conspiracy people will never listen, that there are about 5,000 people
working at JPL alone, and may more working for NASA, the majority of who are
blabbermouths who are definitely not being paid enough to keep quiet about
anything, who will gladly call the local paper for free to spill the beans
if anything really significant were found on any mission.

What the conspiracy theorists don't seem to care to comment on is why JPL
is having the biggest brain drain of highly qualified and experienced
engineers and technicians in the past two years. Even a lot of the MER
engineering team is out of work. Why ? But they're more concerned with
imaginary people on Mars or aliens riding a comet than real, experienced,
and talented people being laid off and the US possibly losing its expertise
in interplanetary spacecraft building.


"Peterson, David" wrote in message
om...
Answering by insulting and trying to make a fool of others you don't

agree
with surely doesn't show
any sign of superior intelligence to understand science...
I didn't insult anyone but I get insulted by people like you, this

just
shows your childish and
uneducated behaviour.


I believe you are insulting the hundreds of scientists and engineers
working on the MER project by questioning their integrity and
dedication to science. You are basically saying some of them are liars
with no proof at all.



  #29  
Old February 1st 04, 07:16 PM
Kenneth Chiu
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
David Nakamoto wrote:
...JPL
is having the biggest brain drain of highly qualified and experienced
engineers and technicians in the past two years. Even a lot of the MER
engineering team is out of work. Why?


Yikes!

So why? Budget cuts? Morale? What percentage are
contractors?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Uncompressed Opportunity Images Elysium Fossa Amateur Astronomy 227 February 11th 04 11:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.