|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
No, you don't get it. I have asked you multiple times *why* they should look at the skin as part of the investigation, and you are utterly unable or unwilling to answer the question. One possible explnation is a soplar panel reflecting sun onto the skin of a module. If thatys at all possible it should be investigated. Part of the trouble uis the station should of never been built without a outside self propelled camera. This was planned by cut in the cost mess. If you cant do it right then dont do it at all. Hey this is my opinion |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
You know, this is really tiresome. The USA has access to the same voice comms and would have heard the same conversations between the crew and moscow. Moscow even provides constant Russia didnt share the telementary indicating the suit problem.... Bioth partners need to communicate all such issues continiously. Just so everyone is aware of whats happening and possibly failing at any time Hey this is my opinion |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
So, since no other space station (the Salyuts, Skylab, Mir) has had such an outside self-propelled camera, are you saying that none of those stations should have been built? ISS is the largest and most complex. with the low rate of available ot soyuz and the shuttle grounded this is different from MIR in its prime years. This makes a camera essential to operations. no need to rush out a airlock when wierd noises occur. The need for such a inspectiion capability is now clear. Hey this is my opinion |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
In other words, you cannot make a connection between the noise and the skin. Noted. No the noise might be skin buckling as mentioned as one possiblity Hey this is my opinion |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
bob haller wrote:
ISS is the largest and most complex. with the low rate of available ot soyuz and the shuttle grounded this is different from MIR in its prime years. This makes a camera essential to operations. no need to rush out a airlock when wierd noises occur. Actually, the more realistic solution is just to install additional SSRMS grappling points that would enable the arm to be used on the russian segment. Particularly, if it could move its end effector all the way around the aft Progress docking port. I don't think it would have taken megabucks to install grappling points on each russian module and string some wires back to Z1 where command/data/power could be provided. It is called foresight. Such a scheme would allow for really easy movement of Pirs from nadir to zenith ports should the russians ever send that commercial module. And it would allow the arm to greatly help with inspections, and once you have the grapling hand, even help fix things (such as a recent progress docking port problem). |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
John Doe wrote in :
bob haller wrote: ISS is the largest and most complex. with the low rate of available ot soyuz and the shuttle grounded this is different from MIR in its prime years. This makes a camera essential to operations. no need to rush out a airlock when wierd noises occur. Actually, the more realistic solution is just to install additional SSRMS grappling points that would enable the arm to be used on the russian segment. Particularly, if it could move its end effector all the way around the aft Progress docking port. Actually, under the original assembly sequence, the Russians/Europeans would have provided the SPP and ERA by now. I don't think it would have taken megabucks to install grappling points on each russian module and string some wires back to Z1 where command/data/power could be provided. It is called foresight. Having the foresight to say that Russia would fail to provide the SPP would probably offend the Russians. They'd probably charge extra for the privilege of installing the grapple fixtures on their hardware. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
System to monitor heat panels could safeguard future spacecraft (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 15th 04 06:14 PM |
ISS On-Orbit Status, 20-02-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | February 21st 04 03:59 PM |
ISS On-Orbit Status, 11-01-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | January 12th 04 11:35 AM |
Pressure monitoring in station | BigSkier | Space Station | 2 | December 1st 03 05:19 PM |
WashPost: “Space Station Mission Opposed” | James Oberg | Space Station | 3 | October 23rd 03 01:10 PM |