A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

THE ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES ALBERT EINSTEIN



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 1st 12, 01:21 PM posted to sci.astro
Tonico
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 120
Default THE ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES ALBERT EINSTEIN

On Apr 1, 9:04*am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
The Albert Einstein Institute is quite systematic in its refutation of Einstein's relativity:

http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...t_white_dwarfs
Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests - the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices."

The speed of cannonballs shot upwards with initial speed v (relative to the shooter) varies with the gravitational potential (gh) in accordance with the equation v'=v(1-gh/v^2) (it is assumed that v(v'-v) and air friction is ignored).

The speed of light emitted upwards with initial speed c (relative to the emitter) varies with the gravitational potential (gh) in accordance with the equation c'=c(1-gh/c^2) given by Newton's emission theory of light. This variation was unequivocally confirmed by the Pound-Rebka experiment:

http://student.fizika.org/~jsisko/Kn...anika/David%20...
David Morin (p. 4): "They [Pound and Rebka] sent gamma rays up a 20m tower and measured the redshift (that is, the decrease in frequency) at the top.. This was a notable feat indeed, considering that they were able to measure a frequency shift of gh/c^2 (which is only a few parts in 10^15) to within 1% accuracy."

David Morin's text referred to above reappears as Chapter 14 in:

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/book.html
Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, David Morin, Cambridge University Press

Pentcho Valev




Idiot
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Next Einstein Giovanni Amelino-Camelia against Original Einstein(Divine Albert) Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 October 25th 11 01:00 AM
Albert Einstein Plagiarist of the Century? Maybe Mad Scientist Misc 26 September 29th 04 08:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.