|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
On 23/09/2011 5:42 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
A theory is based on logical reasoning. Just stating "Nothing moves faster than light" is dogma. I give you that stating 'All dogmas will fall' is also a dogma, and probably with the current state of eeeehhhhh mind ... of humanity all dogmas it holds will not fall before the species goes extinct. But that still leaves Einsteins a dogma. Or perhaps you didn't bother to review the experiments that came before Einstein that were leading to the conclusion that Einstein came to? Yousuf Khan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:07:24 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:
On 23/09/2011 5:42 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote: A theory is based on logical reasoning. Just stating "Nothing moves faster than light" is dogma. I give you that stating 'All dogmas will fall' is also a dogma, and probably with the current state of eeeehhhhh mind ... of humanity all dogmas it holds will not fall before the species goes extinct. But that still leaves Einsteins a dogma. Or perhaps you didn't bother to review the experiments that came before Einstein that were leading to the conclusion that Einstein came to? Yousuf Khan If Muons have mass and they are moving at light speed, then the energy of the particle is, according to SR, a singularity. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
On 23/09/2011 11:39 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:07:24 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote: On 23/09/2011 5:42 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote: A theory is based on logical reasoning. Just stating "Nothing moves faster than light" is dogma. I give you that stating 'All dogmas will fall' is also a dogma, and probably with the current state of eeeehhhhh mind ... of humanity all dogmas it holds will not fall before the species goes extinct. But that still leaves Einsteins a dogma. Or perhaps you didn't bother to review the experiments that came before Einstein that were leading to the conclusion that Einstein came to? Yousuf Khan If Muons have mass and they are moving at light speed, then the energy of the particle is, according to SR, a singularity. Whoever said muons are travelling at the speed of light? Now if you're referring to the "muon neutrino" then you might be right. The three forms of neutrinos: electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino. They might all be massless. Yousuf Khan |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:48:42 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:
On 23/09/2011 11:39 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote: On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:07:24 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote: On 23/09/2011 5:42 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote: A theory is based on logical reasoning. Just stating "Nothing moves faster than light" is dogma. I give you that stating 'All dogmas will fall' is also a dogma, and probably with the current state of eeeehhhhh mind ... of humanity all dogmas it holds will not fall before the species goes extinct. But that still leaves Einsteins a dogma. Or perhaps you didn't bother to review the experiments that came before Einstein that were leading to the conclusion that Einstein came to? Yousuf Khan If Muons have mass and they are moving at light speed, then the energy of the particle is, according to SR, a singularity. Whoever said muons are travelling at the speed of light? Now if you're referring to the "muon neutrino" then you might be right. The three forms of neutrinos: electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino. They might all be massless. Yousuf Khan My bad. For some reason I thought it was a muon, since they mentioned one of my old prof's work. The conventional wisdom is that all massless particles travel at the speed of light. Quite frankly, since all the physicist reporting on this are Italians, I don't think anything interesting has really been found. :-p It is probably more about phunding than physics. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
In article , says...
On 9/22/11 1:04 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote: There's probably an instrument error responsible for this. Good call! This will turn out to be correct. And the solution will be space-time-mass 5 dimensional co-ordinate system mathematics. This will yield the Forbes Transformation - Boowoomba = 1 / sqrt [M^2 + T^2 + L^2] +/- BS where BS is anything we like and applied to validate the theory no matter how obvious it is that it's complete and utter rubbish. Copyright Forbes - 24/9/2011 Yousuf Khan *** Particles recorded moving faster than light - CERN | Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7KM3UU20110922 (Reuters) - An international team of scientists has recorded neutrino particles travelling faster than the speed of light, a spokesman for the researchers said on Thursday -- in what could be a challenge to one of the fundamental rules of physics. Antonio Ereditato, who works at the CERN particle physics centre on the Franco-Swiss border, told Reuters that measurements over three years showed the neutrinos moving 60 nanoseconds quicker than light over a distance of 730 km between Geneva and Gran Sasso, Italy. "We have high confidence in our results. But we need other colleagues to do their tests and confirm them," he said. If confirmed, the discovery would overturn a key part of Albert Einstein's 1905 theory of special relativity, which says that nothing in the universe can travel faster than light. (Reporting by Robert Evans, editing by Tom Miles) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
On 23/09/2011 1:06 PM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
My bad. For some reason I thought it was a muon, since they mentioned one of my old prof's work. The conventional wisdom is that all massless particles travel at the speed of light. Quite frankly, since all the physicist reporting on this are Italians, I don't think anything interesting has really been found. :-p It is probably more about phunding than physics. My money is on the 2009 L'Aquila Italian earthquake changing the landscape, creating a distance calibration error. Yousuf Khan |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 05:22:29 +1000, Byron Forbes wrote:
In article , says... On 9/22/11 1:04 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote: There's probably an instrument error responsible for this. Good call! This will turn out to be correct. And the solution will be space-time-mass 5 dimensional co-ordinate system mathematics. This will yield the Forbes Transformation - Boowoomba = 1 / sqrt [M^2 + T^2 + L^2] +/- BS where BS is anything we like and applied to validate the theory no matter how obvious it is that it's complete and utter rubbish. Copyright Forbes - 24/9/2011 Good satire Byron |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
On 9/23/2011 2:22 PM, Byron Forbes wrote:
In , says... On 9/22/11 1:04 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote: There's probably an instrument error responsible for this. Good call! This will turn out to be correct. And the solution will be space-time-mass 5 dimensional co-ordinate system mathematics. This will yield the Forbes Transformation - Boowoomba = 1 / sqrt [M^2 + T^2 + L^2] +/- BS where BS is anything we like and applied to validate the theory no matter how obvious it is that it's complete and utter rubbish. Copyright Forbes - 24/9/2011 Fascinating. And what experimental predictions would you like to make with the Forbes transformation, so that it can be tested in observational measurement? You know, like relativity. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Neutrinos recorded travelling faster than speed of light!
In sci.physics Yousuf Khan wrote:
On 23/09/2011 1:06 PM, Marvin the Martian wrote: My bad. For some reason I thought it was a muon, since they mentioned one of my old prof's work. The conventional wisdom is that all massless particles travel at the speed of light. Quite frankly, since all the physicist reporting on this are Italians, I don't think anything interesting has really been found. :-p It is probably more about phunding than physics. My money is on the 2009 L'Aquila Italian earthquake changing the landscape, creating a distance calibration error. Yousuf Khan Since it appears they update that in real time, I doubt it. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Faster than the speed of Light | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 5 | July 9th 07 12:40 PM |
Was the Speed of Light Much Faster Billions of Years Ago? Is "c" Not Constant? | Double-A | Misc | 10 | December 13th 06 01:30 PM |
Gravity Waves Faster-Than-Light Speed? | SuperCool Plasma | Misc | 3 | August 13th 05 08:18 PM |
Transmittions Faster then the Speed of Light | Ed | SETI | 1 | November 5th 04 05:11 AM |
Isn't the expansion of space faster than the speed of light? | ROM SPACE KNIGHT NURSE | Amateur Astronomy | 23 | September 5th 04 06:59 PM |