A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

HIGH REDSHIFT QUASAR IN A LOW REDSHIFT GALAXY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 1st 11, 10:20 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.math
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default HIGH REDSHIFT QUASAR IN A LOW REDSHIFT GALAXY

Time to remember Halton Arp:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf5y6PJR5lE
Halton Arp Victim Of Rational Scientific Society

In Einsteiniana's schizophrenic world, the much hated "intrinsic
redshift" discovered by Halton Arp has nothing to do with the
"gravitational redshift" gloriously confirming Divine Albert's Divine
Theory.

Pentcho Valev wrote:

http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-01/6-01.htm
"Around 1911 Einstein proposed to incorporate gravitation into a
modified version of special relativity by allowing the speed of light
to vary as a scalar from place to place in Euclidean space as a
function of the gravitational potential. This "scalar c field" is
remarkably similar to a simple refractive medium, in which the speed
of light varies as a function of the density. Fermat's principle of
least time can then be applied to define the paths of light rays as
geodesics in the spacetime manifold (as discussed in Section 8.4).
Specifically, Einstein wrote in 1911 that the speed of light at a
place with the gravitational potential phi would be c(1+phi/c^2),
where c is the nominal speed of light in the absence of gravity. In
geometrical units we define c=1, so Einstein's 1911 formula can be
written simply as c'=1+phi."

Einstein plagiarized his 1911 formula from Newtonians, and his 1915
(final) formula did not differ considerably: c'=1+2phi. According to
both Newton's emission theory of light and Einstein's relativity, the
intrinsic redshift produced by any celestial body is given by the
formula:

f' = f(1+phi/c^2)

where f is the initial frequency, f' is the frequency in the field-
free space (where the gravitational potential becomes maximal) and phi
is the gravitational potential difference between the point of
emission and the field-free space (0 phi). The decreased frequency
is obviously due to the decreased speed of light.

Then, if light is to travel long distance before it reaches the
observer, its speed will decrease additionally by the "tired light"
mechanism.

Pentcho Valev

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
galaxy at redshift 8.56 Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply][_3_] Research 41 December 7th 10 04:50 PM
using redshift of light from far galaxy Lax UK Astronomy 4 April 20th 10 02:05 PM
#50 connecting Tifft quantized galaxy redshift with Schroedinger [email protected] Astronomy Misc 4 May 25th 08 11:09 PM
Third data release: DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey Steve Willner Astronomy Misc 0 October 3rd 07 04:46 PM
Galaxy Rotation vs Redshift Steve Willner Research 1 July 2nd 03 12:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.