|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
THE DEEPEST SECRET OF EINSTEINIANA
When an observer starts moving towards the wave source, it is the
speed of the wave relative to him that changes (increases) whereas THE WAVELENGTH REMAINS CONSTANT: http://www.tutorvista.com/physics/the-doppler-effect "2. The motion of the source brings about a change in the wavelength of the sound waves and hence there is a change in the observed frequency. 3. The motion of the observer merely changes the rate at which the sound waves are recieved by him. The observer intercepts more waves ( when he approaches) or fewer waves ( when he recedes) each second. The wavelength of the sound waves remains unaffected." It was extremely difficult to find the above EXPLICIT confession in Internet, although the constancy of the wavelength for a moving observer is implicit in any interpretation of the Doppler effect for sound waves. The reason is a severe selfcensorship imposed by Einsteiniana: believers may stop singing "Divine Einstein" and "Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity", then draw an analogy between sound waves and light waves and finally (shock, horror) start questioning Einstein's 1905 false light postulate! The danger is so great that otherwise clever Einsteinians are forced to teach blatant lies: http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html "Moving observer: A man is standing on the beach, watching the tide. The waves are washing into the shore and over his feet with a constant frequency and wavelength. However, if he begins walking out into the ocean, the waves will begin hitting him more frequently, leading him to perceive that the wavelength of the waves has decreased." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...ang/index.html John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)." http://www.haverford.edu/physics/songs/divine.htm No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein Not Maxwell, Curie, or Bohr! He explained the photo-electric effect, And launched quantum physics with his intellect! His fame went glo-bell, he won the Nobel -- He should have been given four! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor with brains galore! No-one could outshine Professor Einstein -- Egad, could that guy derive! He gave us special relativity, That's always made him a hero to me! Brownian motion, my true devotion, He mastered back in aught-five! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor in overdrive! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity. Einstein's postulates imply That planes are shorter when they fly. Their clocks are slowed by time dilation And look warped from aberration. We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity. Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
THE DEEPEST SECRET OF EINSTEINIANA
Another deep secret of Einsteiniana: You will never find Einstein's
1911 equation: c' = c(1+V/c^2) showing that the speed of light varies with the gravitational potential in accordance with Newton's emission theory of light, and the trivial formula: (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) discussed in the same text: http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." http://www.astronomynotes.com/relativity/s4.htm "Prediction: light escaping from a large mass should lose energy---the wavelength must increase since the speed of light is constant. Stronger surface gravity produces a greater increase in the wavelength. This is a consequence of time dilation. Suppose person A on the massive object decides to send light of a specific frequency f to person B all of the time. So every second, f wave crests leave person A. The same wave crests are received by person B in an interval of time interval of (1+z) seconds. He receives the waves at a frequency of f/(1+z). Remember that the speed of light c = (the frequency f) (the wavelength L). If the frequency is reduced by (1+z) times, the wavelength must INcrease by (1+z) times: L_atB = (1+z) L_atA. In the doppler effect, this lengthening of the wavelength is called a redshift. For gravity, the effect is called a GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT." Were Einsteinians to display the two formulas on the same page, believers would stop singing "Divine Einstein" and "Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity", then see the relation between the gravitational redshift factor 1+V/c^2 and c'=c(1+V/c^2), and finally (shock, horror) come to the conclusion that the wavelength is constant again and the Pound-Rebka experiment has in fact confirmed not just Divine Albert's Divine Theory but, rather, Newton's emission theory of light: http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "So, faced with this evidence most readers must be wondering why we learn about the importance of the constancy of speed of light. Did Einstein miss this? Sometimes I find out that what's written in our textbooks is just a biased version taken from the original work, so after searching within the original text of the theory of GR by Einstein, I found this quote: "In the second place our result shows that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Now we might think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of relativity and with it the whole theory of relativity would be laid in the dust. But in reality this is not the case. We can only conclude that the special theory of relativity cannot claim an unlimited domain of validity ; its results hold only so long as we are able to disregard the influences of gravitational fields on the phenomena (e.g. of light)." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) - The General Theory of Relativity: Chapter 22 - A Few Inferences from the General Principle of Relativity-. Today we find that since the Special Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity. One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FACTOR." Pentcho Valev wrote: When an observer starts moving towards the wave source, it is the speed of the wave relative to him that changes (increases) whereas THE WAVELENGTH REMAINS CONSTANT: http://www.tutorvista.com/physics/the-doppler-effect "2. The motion of the source brings about a change in the wavelength of the sound waves and hence there is a change in the observed frequency. 3. The motion of the observer merely changes the rate at which the sound waves are recieved by him. The observer intercepts more waves ( when he approaches) or fewer waves ( when he recedes) each second. The wavelength of the sound waves remains unaffected." It was extremely difficult to find the above EXPLICIT confession in Internet, although the constancy of the wavelength for a moving observer is implicit in any interpretation of the Doppler effect for sound waves. The reason is a severe selfcensorship imposed by Einsteiniana: believers may stop singing "Divine Einstein" and "Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity", then draw an analogy between sound waves and light waves and finally (shock, horror) start questioning Einstein's 1905 false light postulate! The danger is so great that otherwise clever Einsteinians are forced to teach blatant lies: http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html "Moving observer: A man is standing on the beach, watching the tide. The waves are washing into the shore and over his feet with a constant frequency and wavelength. However, if he begins walking out into the ocean, the waves will begin hitting him more frequently, leading him to perceive that the wavelength of the waves has decreased." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...ang/index.html John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)." http://www.haverford.edu/physics/songs/divine.htm No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein Not Maxwell, Curie, or Bohr! He explained the photo-electric effect, And launched quantum physics with his intellect! His fame went glo-bell, he won the Nobel -- He should have been given four! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor with brains galore! No-one could outshine Professor Einstein -- Egad, could that guy derive! He gave us special relativity, That's always made him a hero to me! Brownian motion, my true devotion, He mastered back in aught-five! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor in overdrive! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity. Einstein's postulates imply That planes are shorter when they fly. Their clocks are slowed by time dilation And look warped from aberration. We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, 8.033, relativity. Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hubble's Deepest Look Into,Space Now Rendered In 3D | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | April 8th 10 10:06 PM |
Deepest xrays and black hole merger | Ray Vingnutte | Misc | 0 | April 8th 05 03:03 AM |
Al Bean in Deepest Space | [email protected] | Technology | 0 | March 18th 05 02:43 PM |
BBC - Hubble's deepest shot is a puzzle | Nick | UK Astronomy | 2 | September 30th 04 01:26 PM |
My deepest apologies | SPQR | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | July 24th 03 06:31 PM |