#11
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Laws
On Oct 25, 10:42 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 25, 1:53 wrote: On Oct 19, 10:42 am, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 18, 3:59 wrote: On Oct 14, 9:23 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Oct 14, 4:28 wrote: On Oct 14, 5:16 pm, Jim Davis wrote: William Mook wrote: I suppose when the voice of reason can't prove me wrong, they call out the voice of unreason. William, would you care to identify by whom you mean by "they"? Surely you don't think there's a mysterious "they" out there trying to make life difficult for you, do you? I mean, that's always been *Brad's* complaint. :-) Well, if this line of reasoning causes Brad to temper his responses does it matter? Now that's a weird contribution, Rabbi Mook. What part of MI5/NSA did you say you worked for? - Brad Guth - Is it just me being Californicated watching all the specialty license plates in Malibu, but does MI5/NSA when you squint at it look like MENSA? Is Brad trying to tell us something? Is he sending a coded message? Discuss among yourselves. Cause we're not going to get much done talking about moon laws.. haha.. Of whomever has the biggest and best battery of SBLs (aka laser cannons) is clearly in charge of whatever "moon laws" they'd care to impose. The best location and energy resource for accommodating those SBLs is directly related to my LSE-CM/ISS. Terribly sorry about all that. What do exactly you have against an efficient and safe Lunar Space Elevator? BTW, is there anyone else in this anti-think-tank of usenet naysayland that likes 75+% of your research and ideas, besides myself? Just wondering, can you list those of usenet as being constructively in support of anythingWillie.Moo/(William Mook)? - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brad, Please understand, and I say this with the greatest respect and care I can muster, you are quite mad. Literally out of your mind. The moment that dawns on you without remorse, without self revulsion, without attacking yourself, without guilt, you can begin to heal. Now, having said that, please understand I have nothing against your schemes they are merely wrong. I have nothing against your beliefs. They are merely wrong. Its just that simple. If you would adjust your thinking so that you could see that you are foregoing a lot of happiness in your life because first and foremost you want to be right. And if you cannot be right, then its war! haha.. Let me put it this way. Let's say there was a President who told the American people that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when there wasn't. And lets say there was a President who told the American people that Al Queda operated out of Iraq when it iddn't. And lets say that there was an American President who told the American people that our troops would be greeted as liberators when they wouldn't. And lets say that there was an American President who said that the Iraqi oil would pay for the war, which it couldn't. Now lets say the American President really and truly believed these things when he said them. Would he be right in asking someone who questioned the validity of those beliefs, why he hated America? What he had against America? Same thing with you Brad. Such a President may be ill-informed, may be a tool of larger powers, may be crazy, may even be a liar. But one thing that President couldn't logically and rationally ask anyone who called him on his judgments, is what did you have against America? That's just madness and points directly at madness. Same thing with you Brad. WHat do I have against your lunar space station elevator idea? Well, I have nothing against it,except it won't work as you advertise and its a waste of time energy and resources to even think about. But you wrongly and madly jump from that benign statement about reality to what do I have against you? I have nothing at all against you Brad except you waste an inordinate amount of time on unworkable insane bull****, and no matter how clearly and plainly someone points out the error of your ways, you absolutely refuse to acknowledge the madness and ask what people have against you. haha.. To which we conclude, you are either ill-informed, or a tool of larger powers, or crazy, or lying through your teeth. And these are not mutually exclusive. I saw a picture in the New York Times the other day of the Dali Llama and President Bush in the Capitol Rotunda. Bush was running his mouth pointing at some detail of the artwork in the Rotunda. That'd be like him, having audience with one of the most enlightened humans on the planet and not taking the time to listen what he might have to say, and wasting his time with pointless minutiae. haha.. You just gotta laugh. The way the Dali Llama was laughing while Bush was running his mouth. And that's the way I laugh at you and your insane questions. While I try once again to set you on the road to sanity. good luck dude. ??? "To which we conclude" ??? (there's that pesky "we" again) Does that mean that your MI5/DHS/NSA/CIA infowar resources are running a bit thin? BTW, when am I getting that ride onboard your N367G? (I'd like nothing better than taking a spendy crap at 40,000' while onboard your private 737-75). If I got better and stayed really nice (even to those nasty Zion Yids), could I have one of my own? - Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oops! looks as though I've just killed off our resident MI5/NSA/CIA spook William Mook. Sorry about that. Perhaps Raytheon and General Electric can find it within their offshore corporate hearts to forgive and forget, just like they forgave and forgotten about most of everything else that got us into this perpetrated cloak and dagger bloody and spendy 9/11 fiasco. - Brad Guth - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Laws of Nature | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | January 2nd 07 10:31 PM |
80/f5 For the In-Laws | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 3rd 05 12:55 AM |
IP in china worse than no laws at all | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | February 24th 05 03:02 AM |
Kepler's laws and trajectories | tetrahedron | Astronomy Misc | 2 | March 27th 04 05:31 AM |
Kepler's laws | Michael McNeil | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 23rd 04 04:45 PM |