|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
fiberglass experiment Chapt8 Experiment that shows what redshiftreally is #40 Atom Totality theory 5th ed.
I am finding out that chapters with experiments involved can tend to
be far longer than chapters without experiments. But that is a good sign. Let this be the last post of chapter8 and let me get to chapter9 where I prove that lightwaves cannot be Doppler shifted and in future editions of this book let me reverse the order so that the proof of no Doppler shift possible on light precedes the fiberglass experiment. Subject: how to make sense of the largest blueshift ever reported Let me first start off by saying that neither the Big Bang nor the Atom Totality theories are comfortable with reported large blueshifts from distant galaxies. Both theories predict a predominance of redshifts. Both are comfortable with a few blueshifts in nearby local galaxies. Blueshifts of rotation are expected. And blueshifts of Andromeda and Barnard star is acceptable, for they are tiny blueshifts and nearby. But as for this report: --- quoting about a quasar blueshift --- http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...=2005ApJ...618... Â*We have obtained optical intermediate-resolution spectra (R=3000) of Â*the narrow-line quasars DMS 0059-0055 and PG 1543+489. The [O III] Â*emission line in DMS 0059-0055 is blueshifted by 880 km s-1 relative Â*to Hbeta. We also confirm that the [O III] emission line in PG Â*1543+489 has a relative blueshift of 1150 km s-1. These two narrow- Â*line quasars show the largest [O III] blueshifts known to date among Â*type 1 active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Â*--- end quoting --- Both theories are uncomfortable with that report. Could it be a report in error? The Atom Totality theory may be able to explain that in that the distance in the Atom Totality is far shrunk from distances of the Big Bang theory. In the Atom Totality theory 400 million light years is the end of the Cosmos and so a lot of what we thought were far away, was not that far away. And in the Atom Totality, a lobe shape of the 5f6 are like long cigar shapes and so hot blue stars in a galaxy can appear bluish for a blueshift. Or, could it be what the Wikipedia says about a gravitational lens blueshift only in this situation a EM lens blueshift? --- quoting Wikipedia on redshift --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift Â*Finally, gravitational Â*redshifts are a relativistic effect observed in electromagnetic Â*radiation moving out of gravitational fields. Conversely, a decrease Â*in wavelength is called blue shift and is generally seen when a light- Â*emitting object moves toward an observer or when electromagnetic Â*radiation moves into a gravitational field. --- end quoting Wikipedia --- So that maybe, just maybe, the EM lens of a Atom Totality has a band of blueshifted galaxies at a special distance from Earth. Just like in that survey where a "ring structure" appears and not knowing if it is an intrinsic ring. So maybe, just maybe, the Atom Totality theory with a predominance of redshift has a lens, such that a optical affect occurrs so that a Cosmic ring of blueshifts occurrs at a special distance from earth. In summary, essentially the Big Bang and the Atom Totality predict vast and widespread and the overwhelming majority of shifts to be redshift, and a rarity of blueshifts. Just as the fiberglass window panel sees every white light redshifted, that only the local galaxies and stars have a chance of a blueshift. But because the EM lens of the Atom Totality is a lens of a optical affect, that there is a possibility that at a certain distance, the white light becomes blueshifted in a halo ring affect. Subject: how to make sense of the largest blueshift ever reported - Show quoted text - Sorry, I should have referenced this "survey" and the "halo ring of the survey". In this survey a curious ring is found, and whether it is intrinsic or not? --- quoting --- http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff...tt/papers/LSS/ The third layer (0.01 z 0.02) is dominated by the P-P supercluster (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown whether this ring-like structure is physically associated with the cosmic web or an artifact of projection. --- end quoting --- So I ask the question whether the above Harvard furthest distant blueshift is a galaxy member belonging to this ring? http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/np...=2005ApJ...618... So if the Harvard quasar blueshift is a member of the Caltech survey reported ring structure, then we may have solved a troublesome report. The solution is that the Cosmos has ring structure which is due to a EM lens of the Atom Totality. Subject: low mass electron-positron states, and a bit of history of Halton Arp wrote: (snipped) Also ran across a website of Arp's dated 2002, but a website has no reliable dating and who mentions low mass electron-positron states. http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/is_physics_changing Now I wonder if that was connected to Dirac's Ocean of Positrons as Space? Or where this fascination for low mass electron-positron states came about? For me, the fascination is of course that in an Atom Totality, gravity is the attraction between ordinary matter (which is the electrons of the Plutonium Atom Totality) for the attraction by Space which is positron-Space. So space attracted by matter yields gravity as the lowest Coulomb attraction. And then, of course, when matter is concentrated, it forms a MECO with matter- antimatter annihilation and we see it as a quasar. Here is a quote from Arp's website listed above: --- quoting --- This brings us to the conventional assumption of extragalactic redshifts as representing large recessional velocities versus the evidence for their being an intrinsic property of young matter. The key here is the rock upon which science is founded - the observations. Large redshifts differences are observed between whole extragalactic objects which are at the same distance. Intrinsic redshifts are required. But now what is the consequence of having low mass fundamental particles? It is simply that low mass electrons transitioning between atomic orbits will emit and absorb lower energy photons, i.e. they will appear redshifted compared to atoms with heavier particles. --- end quoting --- Okay, I begin to see why Arp is harping (sorry, pun not intended) about low-mass-electrons as a means of explaining redshift and how Arp seemed to focus on Narlikar's 1977 work on the field equations for particle-mass changing with time. --- The above was in the 3rd edition and this is the 5th edition. I decided to include Arp's mechanism of low-mass-electrons. It is an alternative mechanism for having redshifts. And I prefer Arp's mechanism over that of the ludicrous Big Bang of a speeding expansion causing a Doppler redshift. Rather ridiculous and preposterous to think of Space as independent of Matter and speeding along faster than the speed of light. So, Arp's mechanism is far better than ever was the Big Bang mechanism. But a major flaw of Arp's idea is that it is not a universal phenomenon but a localized phenomenon which cannot explain the universal observance of a redshift, unless you want to interject Dirac's new radioactivities for which Arp never even mentions and is probably unaware of Dirac's new radioactivities. But even here, if you inject Dirac's new radioactivities as low mass electrons, is there enough low mass electrons to create this universal redshift? No. Finally, let me end this chapter with some enigma blueshifts, and as I so often said earlier, that we need a far better comprehensive list of anomalies of redshift versus blueshift. The below probably fits in better in the chapter of this book where I discuss that the furthest distance is likely to be 400 million light years and that such is the "end of the Cosmos". 1. The quasar "in" NGC 7319Science Advisor Retired Staff. [Moderator note: this thread has been created by splitting out posts related to 'the quasar "in" NGC 7319', in the quasar anomaly ... 2. www.physicsforums.com › ... › General Astronomy - Cached - Similar 3. Halton Arp's discoveries about redshift96-101) Halton Arp discusses the five interacting galaxies NGC 7317, 7318A, 7318B, 7319, and 7320 that constitute Stephan's Quintet. The last one, NGC 7320, ... 4. www.electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm - Cached - Similar Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt8 Experiment that shows what redshift really is #37 AtomTotality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 8th 11 06:58 PM |
Chapt8 Experiment that shows what redshift really is #35 AtomTotality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 7th 11 09:10 PM |
Chapt8 Experiment that shows what redshift really is #33 AtomTotality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 7th 11 08:46 AM |
Chapt8 Experiment that shows what redshift really is #31 AtomTotality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 6th 11 06:43 PM |
Chapt8 Experiment that shows us what redshift really is #28 AtomTotality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 5th 11 07:31 AM |