|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapt8 Experiment that shows what redshift really is #33 AtomTotality theory 5th ed.
Now I am sort of debating whether I should have the chapter that
exposes the Doppler redshifting of light as nonexistent before I do the chapter on the fiberglass experiment. I do not know which is the better. Whether I out right prove that light waves can have no Doppler shift, or whether I have the chapter that shows what the Cosmic redshift really is-- curvature of Space. Anyway, the Doppler redshift of light in modern day physics is perhaps the biggest and most glaring mistake in modern day physics because most of the science of Astronomy and Cosmology is anchored in a false belief of the Doppler shift of light. You take away the Doppler shift of light in Astronomy and you almost have 1/2 of the science gutted, or should I say decapitated. You know, I wrote the Correcting Math book simultaneous to this Atom Totality book and the major correction in mathematics is a precision definition of finite versus infinite, but if I were to write a similar book called Correcting Physics, one of the major corrections would have to be the Doppler shift of light, and comparing the two sciences, one has a sense that how could the physics community have been so feeble in mind as to never raise the issue-- "Let us check out via experiments, whether light can even be Doppler shifted"? The experiment that already exists is the slowing down of light which I will detail in the next chapter, that the slowing down of light, by Logic, if Doppler shift exists for light, then the slowed down light should be redshifted in proportion to its slowed down state. However, all the experiments in slowed down light is the same white light in as the white light out, figuratively speaking. In the military there is a common expression when on watch-duty, to "not drop the ball", meaning that you are alert and active in watching. So how could the physics community from year 1899 to 2010, how could that physics community have assigned the Doppler shift to light waves, yet never really experimentally tested it? Mindboggling how the physics community could have been asleep for over a century on a fundamental question that makes up so much of astronomy and cosmology. But before I get to that Experimentum Crucis that light waves have no Doppler shifting, let me continue with the fiberglass experiment that shows us what redshift of galaxies truly is. Subject: does the blueshift support the Atom Totality more than the Big Bang? Blueshift is not an easy topic to find out information. Anyway, let me summarize the types of redshift commonly bantered about. There are three such types: (a) Doppler redshift -- relative motion or speeding away of two objects, causing an elongation of the wavelength (b) Cosmological redshift-- due to expansion of Space itself from a Big Bang (c) Gravitational redshift-- pull of a gravitational field. We can leave out gravitational redshift because we are concerned about the galaxies redshift. The Atom Totality would argue that the Cosmological redshift is not due to a explosion, because Space is not moving or expanding but rather standing still, a huge gigantic Plutonium Atom, and the Cosmic redshift is due to light traveling through a highly curved Space of that big atom. And the Atom Totality theory would say on the issue of Cosmic redshift, that we can exclude Doppler redshift since the speeds of galaxies are so small of speeds that they have little to no contribution. And as the experiment of a fiberglass window with oncoming headlights of autos shows that the redshift is all about refraction by Space. Redshift as the curvature of Space is what the Atom Totality prescribes, and it is a relationship dependent on distance, similar to the Hubble law, only the cause is not an expansion but a geometry effect. So, the question is, can the blueshift tell whether the Big Bang is true or false? And can the blueshift tell if the Atom Totality is true or false? I think it can. There should be a lot more blueshifts occurring if the Big Bang is true. In fact, blueshifts are rare. This indicates that the curvature of space causing redshifts goes into action at a relatively small distance away from Earth. Beyond the Andromeda galaxy there is hardly any blueshift seen. What blueshift occurrs is rotational speeds and this is a very tiny blueshift due to bright hot blue stars predominant in that arm of the spiral. I think the data supports the Atom Totality. Because if blueshifts disappear at relatively small distance from Earth, indicates that the geometry of Space is the cause, not the motion or expansion of Space. The Big Bang would predict a large number of cases of blueshift for distant galaxies. The Atom Totality would predict rare cases of blueshift for distant galaxies. As far as I can see in the reports, there are no blueshifts, unless you want to call the rotational motion as blueshifts. In a debate of the Big Bang versus Atom Totality over redshift and blueshift, I want to draw attention on a weakness of the Big Bang theory that is exploitative. The Big Bang says there are no edges to the Cosmos and there is no center of the Cosmos. So they are saying that the Big Bang is 2D Elliptic geometry as a sphere surface to account for an explosion and that this explosion gives a redshift since all galaxies are moving away from one another. But they are in trouble with that notion because we know that Space is 3 dimensional. The Atom Totality understands that space is 3 dimensional and tries to show a 3rd dimension to the surface of a sphere. It is this 3rd dimension that light from distant galaxies has to travel through and is thus refracted and redshifted. This 3rd dimension is sort of like a * lens* and as white light travels through that lens, it is redshifted. So where the Big Bang explains redshift as a 2D explosion for a sphere surface, the Atom Totality explains the redshift as the 3rd Dimension of the sphere surface with a lens as the third that causes the redshift. Through the years someone should have composed a compendium of all the blueshifts, for I believe such a focused study on just blueshifts alone can decide whether the Big Bang theory is a fake or has a fighting chance. Since blueshifts are rare and only local. Discounting all the blueshifts due to rotations. We can agree that the blueshift of galaxies does not favor the Big Bang. Let me summarize the blueshift for the Atom Totality, in that it occurs for nearby galaxies which has a predominate number of hot blue stars in the observers line of sight, and it is not a Doppler shift but a result of minor-refraction. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt8 Experiment that shows what redshift really is #31 AtomTotality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 6th 11 06:43 PM |
Chapt8 Experiment that shows us what redshift really is #28 AtomTotality theory 5th ed. | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 5th 11 07:31 AM |
Chapt. 3; shadow-effect threatens the Big Bang theory #311 AtomTotality theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 10 | December 22nd 10 06:46 AM |
Nebular Dust Cloud theory has contradictions #146; 3rd ed; AtomTotality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 15th 09 08:17 AM |
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 8 | May 20th 09 01:17 AM |