|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that
I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Or at least photos from a very low orbit. I think this would be fascinating. Is it because the atmospheric temperature would melt the probe/camera before it reached the low orbit and/or descent? Are there any known plans to send a probe that could withstand the extreme temps (or gravity?) to achieve such a feat? Larry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
"Larry G" wrote in message ... Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Or at least photos from a very low orbit. I think this would be fascinating. Is it because the atmospheric temperature would melt the probe/camera before it reached the low orbit and/or descent? Are there any known plans to send a probe that could withstand the extreme temps (or gravity?) to achieve such a feat? Larry Only one probe has entered Jupiter's atmosphere. The probe from the Galileo spacecraft. It, unfortunately didn't have a camera. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
"Larry G" wrote in message ... Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Or at least photos from a very low orbit. I think this would be fascinating. Is it because the atmospheric temperature would melt the probe/camera before it reached the low orbit and/or descent? Are there any known plans to send a probe that could withstand the extreme temps (or gravity?) to achieve such a feat? Larry Only one probe has entered Jupiter's atmosphere. The probe from the Galileo spacecraft. It, unfortunately didn't have a camera. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
"Larry G" wrote in message
... Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Or at least photos from a very low orbit. I think this would be fascinating. Is it because the atmospheric temperature would melt the probe/camera before it reached the low orbit and/or descent? Are there any known plans to send a probe that could withstand the extreme temps (or gravity?) to achieve such a feat? Larry Wouldn't melt it, it would be eventually crushed. The atmosphere is cold and gets progressively colder and with higher pressure as it gets thicker. There's nothing to see - ever been inside a fog bank? That's what it'd look like. -- Alan Erskine alanterskine(at)hotmail.com Due to Optusnet's failure to deal with the current virus SPAM attack, respond to alanterskine(at)hotmail.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
"Larry G" writes:
Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Limited uplink bandwidth plus limited available light. Both factors imply that It Would Cost Too Much To Fly It. Or at least photos from a very low orbit. Define "low." Also, _too_ low, and atmospheric drag sucks in your Incredibly Expensive Space Probe. I think this would be fascinating. "Fascinating" doesn't always Pay The Bills. Is it because the atmospheric temperature would melt the probe/camera before it reached the low orbit and/or descent? No. It is because of Limited Bandwidth, Limited Light, and Limited Budget. Are there any known plans to send a probe that could withstand the extreme temps (or gravity?) to achieve such a feat? No. (BTW, "gravity" is hardly an issue; the Jupiter Entry Probe experienced =FAR= higher gee-loads during the atmospheric entry.) -- Gordon D. Pusch perl -e '$_ = \n"; s/NO\.//; s/SPAM\.//; print;' |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
In article ,
Larry G wrote: Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Because there has only ever been one probe into Jupiter's atmosphere -- the Galileo atmosphere probe -- and various design limitations (not least, the fact that it was built with early-1970s electronics) made a camera impossible there. Or at least photos from a very low orbit. Very low Jupiter orbits tend to involve very high radiation doses and are most unhealthy for electronics. The only probe that has really passed low over Jupiter was Pioneer 11, which made one quick flyby; it had only a very simple camera system, and didn't get many pictures, especially from high-radiation areas where the camera kept having to be reset. Both Galileo and its probe passed through such altitudes on their way into Jupiter, of course, but the probe had no camera and Galileo's antenna problems prevented real-time image transmission during its last hours. ...Are there any known plans to send a probe that could withstand the extreme temps (or gravity?) to achieve such a feat? There is interest in doing more Jupiter atmosphere probes -- especially since Galileo's probe, annoyingly enough, seems to have gone into a fairly unusual area and so we're not sure how its data generalizes to Jupiter's atmosphere as a whole -- but so far, no funded missions. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
In article , Larry G wrote:
Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Or at least photos from a very low orbit. I think this would be fascinating. Is it because the atmospheric temperature would melt the probe/camera before it reached the low orbit and/or descent? Are there any known plans to send a probe that could withstand the extreme temps (or gravity?) to achieve such a feat? Bear in mind there have only ever been two probes to do anything more than a flyby of the gas giants, and one of those is still en-route... Galileo did carry a small probe to be dropped into Jupiter, but a variety of reasons - the very limited amount of data transmission that was possible being a major one - meant that equipping it for photography wasn't a reasonable option. I've seen the decision characterised as "some interesting science, or two photographs". http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...0spsystems.net http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...0spsystems.net (& following thread) for a couple of posts discussing it; there's more, but I don't want to spend all evening googling g Cassini also has an entry probe, but this is designed to be dropped onto Titan - undeniably a more interesting target... -- -Andrew Gray |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question
"Larry G" wrote in message ...
Here's a question I've always wondered about. How come no space probe (that I'm aware of) has taken photos inside Jupiter's (or any of the large planets') atmosphere? Or at least photos from a very low orbit. Galileo dropped a probe into Jupiter's atmosphere, but it did not have a camera. I don't recall the reason why. The probe successfully entered the atmosphere, deployed its parachute, and radio'd atmospheric chemistry data back to Galileo/Earth. So it's quite possible to do this, it just hasn't been done, and voyages to the major planets are infrequent. Mike Miller, Materials Engineer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question How about radar?
I just wondered if it might be possible to get some radar images of Jupiter
so that the clouds could be 'seen' at the different levels. It was indeed intriguing that the probe seems to have contradicted what everyone supposed was the case, or did it just hit a strange point by a fluke? I'm not up in the current radar imaging techniques, but I just sort of wondered.... Brian -- Brian Gaff.... graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 06/11/03 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter question How about radar?
In article ,
Brian Gaff wrote: I just wondered if it might be possible to get some radar images of Jupiter so that the clouds could be 'seen' at the different levels. I'm sure it's been tried -- there's been radar work done on the Galilean satellites -- but I don't recall ever seeing any results (not that it's an area I follow much). For a guess, you just don't see very much -- radar astronomy is primarily for surfaces, you don't get major reflections from clouds. It was indeed intriguing that the probe seems to have contradicted what everyone supposed was the case, or did it just hit a strange point by a fluke? It was understood before arrival, from ground and Hubble observations, that the probe entry point had a high probability of being abnormal, by sheer bad luck of what atmospheric features happened to be there at the time. But nobody knows for sure *how* abnormal it was. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spacesuit question | Bill Porter | Space Station | 19 | July 6th 04 01:28 PM |
New Dark Spot on Jupiter | Brian Webb | Space Shuttle | 1 | February 5th 04 03:33 AM |
Galileo To Taste Jupiter Before Taking Final Plunge | Ron Baalke | Science | 21 | September 30th 03 05:41 AM |
The Final Day on Galileo | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 19th 03 07:32 PM |
Surprising Jupiter - Busy Galileo Spacecraft Showed Jovian System Is Full Of Surprises | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 18th 03 06:51 AM |