|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
Even if ET have never sent a probe to our solar system,
they may have sent fast moving probes to other stars and systems and those probes could have since drifted into our system. The challenge is how do you find an alien probe that's been inactive for perhaps eons? Especially since we have no clue what such a probe should look like either when it was launched or after it has been pelted by meteorites for eons. I think one relatively easy way to search for these hypothetical probes would be to use a combination of radar, lasers and visual spectrum telescopes. If a probe has a large radio dish then when it is in a certain orientation to earth (say within 40 degrees of pointing at earth) it's radar signature will be louder than that of many random shapes the same size. Visual observation can be used to determine the size (a guess can be made). A similar principal can be used if the hypothetical probe has optics for sending messages by laser. A powerful laser beam sent from earth will be reflected more strongly from the optics of a probe when the probe is in a certain alignment - although obviously the return signal will be relatively weak. These search methods can be tested on known probes that were launched from earth. If it's a valid method for finding our own probes then it might be useful in finding ETI probes under the usual assumption that ET's communication technology is similar to our own (or was when one or more of their probes was launched). Opinions? -McDaniel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
In message , Hobbs aka
McDaniel writes Even if ET have never sent a probe to our solar system, they may have sent fast moving probes to other stars and systems and those probes could have since drifted into our system. The challenge is how do you find an alien probe that's been inactive for perhaps eons? Especially since we have no clue what such a probe should look like either when it was launched or after it has been pelted by meteorites for eons. I think one relatively easy way to search for these hypothetical probes would be to use a combination of radar, lasers and visual spectrum telescopes. If a probe has a large radio dish then when it is in a certain orientation to earth (say within 40 degrees of pointing at earth) it's radar signature will be louder than that of many random shapes the same size. I suspect that the problem is that there are hundreds of thousands of objects in the solar system the same apparent size (say 100 meters) as your hypothetical probe. The fourth-power rule determining the return signal from an object at an unknown location makes radar a very poor tool for searching for such objects, which is why most searches for NEOs use visual methods. Radar has been used to map asteroids at known positions, and to look for relatively nearby terrestrial probes when their status was uncertain (such as SOHO), but needs enormous output power. And the return signal is the only way to tell the size of an object unless we already know its albedo, or it has some unusual polarisation properties. Anyway, I suspect that if ET is in the solar system he is hiding in the anti-Earth Lagrange point, shielded from view by the Sun! -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
In message , Hobbs aka
McDaniel writes Even if ET have never sent a probe to our solar system, they may have sent fast moving probes to other stars and systems and those probes could have since drifted into our system. The challenge is how do you find an alien probe that's been inactive for perhaps eons? Especially since we have no clue what such a probe should look like either when it was launched or after it has been pelted by meteorites for eons. I think one relatively easy way to search for these hypothetical probes would be to use a combination of radar, lasers and visual spectrum telescopes. If a probe has a large radio dish then when it is in a certain orientation to earth (say within 40 degrees of pointing at earth) it's radar signature will be louder than that of many random shapes the same size. I suspect that the problem is that there are hundreds of thousands of objects in the solar system the same apparent size (say 100 meters) as your hypothetical probe. The fourth-power rule determining the return signal from an object at an unknown location makes radar a very poor tool for searching for such objects, which is why most searches for NEOs use visual methods. Radar has been used to map asteroids at known positions, and to look for relatively nearby terrestrial probes when their status was uncertain (such as SOHO), but needs enormous output power. And the return signal is the only way to tell the size of an object unless we already know its albedo, or it has some unusual polarisation properties. Anyway, I suspect that if ET is in the solar system he is hiding in the anti-Earth Lagrange point, shielded from view by the Sun! -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
Hi Everyone
I am new to this newsgroup and figured I would chime in. What about looking on the moon? The moon might be a great place for ET to set up and observe from a distance. As an amateur astronomer I am asked many many times if we can see the Lunar Lander or the flag. This is of course beyond todays optics (especially mine) but glint reflections are easy. Just consider the retroreflector that was left behind by Apollo. Radar on the other hand should be able to resolve something like the LEM, and presumably something left behind by ET. So why not start with a systematic search of the moon? Best regards Keith Larson |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
Hi Everyone
I am new to this newsgroup and figured I would chime in. What about looking on the moon? The moon might be a great place for ET to set up and observe from a distance. As an amateur astronomer I am asked many many times if we can see the Lunar Lander or the flag. This is of course beyond todays optics (especially mine) but glint reflections are easy. Just consider the retroreflector that was left behind by Apollo. Radar on the other hand should be able to resolve something like the LEM, and presumably something left behind by ET. So why not start with a systematic search of the moon? Best regards Keith Larson |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
In message , Keith Larson
writes Hi Everyone I am new to this newsgroup and figured I would chime in. What about looking on the moon? The moon might be a great place for ET to set up and observe from a distance. As an amateur astronomer I am asked many many times if we can see the Lunar Lander or the flag. This is of course beyond todays optics (especially mine) but glint reflections are easy. Just consider the retroreflector that was left behind by Apollo. Radar on the other hand should be able to resolve something like the LEM, and presumably something left behind by ET. So why not start with a systematic search of the moon? Some time in the next 20 years we will see a two-meter-resolution survey of the Moon, as is now being done for Mars. If not by the US, by the Indians or Japanese. Perhaps you just need to be patient :-) But there's still the problem of deciding if that little blob a couple of pixels across is interesting, and the other problem of imaging inside the dark craters at the poles. Radar mapping at resolution of a few meters calls for some very high-powered equipment. Apparently one possibility has been examined and no evidence found. The magnetic field of the Moon has been mapped and there was no sign of TMA -1 :-( But don't forget that in the original story the Sentinel was found by someone who went and looked. That could take years - or decades. You've probably found by now that some people think ET is already on the Moon (Blair Cuspids, lunar spires, "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon", tracks, etc. etc.) and that the Authorities are covering it up. That's presumably done by letting people write books about it, create web sites, and do lecture tours. -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
In message , Keith Larson
writes Hi Everyone I am new to this newsgroup and figured I would chime in. What about looking on the moon? The moon might be a great place for ET to set up and observe from a distance. As an amateur astronomer I am asked many many times if we can see the Lunar Lander or the flag. This is of course beyond todays optics (especially mine) but glint reflections are easy. Just consider the retroreflector that was left behind by Apollo. Radar on the other hand should be able to resolve something like the LEM, and presumably something left behind by ET. So why not start with a systematic search of the moon? Some time in the next 20 years we will see a two-meter-resolution survey of the Moon, as is now being done for Mars. If not by the US, by the Indians or Japanese. Perhaps you just need to be patient :-) But there's still the problem of deciding if that little blob a couple of pixels across is interesting, and the other problem of imaging inside the dark craters at the poles. Radar mapping at resolution of a few meters calls for some very high-powered equipment. Apparently one possibility has been examined and no evidence found. The magnetic field of the Moon has been mapped and there was no sign of TMA -1 :-( But don't forget that in the original story the Sentinel was found by someone who went and looked. That could take years - or decades. You've probably found by now that some people think ET is already on the Moon (Blair Cuspids, lunar spires, "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon", tracks, etc. etc.) and that the Authorities are covering it up. That's presumably done by letting people write books about it, create web sites, and do lecture tours. -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
"Keith Larson" wrote in message
... Hi Everyone I am new to this newsgroup and figured I would chime in. What about looking on the moon? The moon might be a great place for ET to set up and observe from a distance. As an amateur astronomer I am asked many many times if we can see the Lunar Lander or the flag. This is of course beyond todays optics (especially mine) but glint reflections are easy. Just consider the retroreflector that was left behind by Apollo. Radar on the other hand should be able to resolve something like the LEM, and presumably something left behind by ET. So why not start with a systematic search of the moon? Ah! This brings back old memories! I remember as a young person being fascinated by the Moon and particularly by a book by H.P. Wilkins called "Our Moon" (I still have this book, dated 1954). He had a chapter tiltled "Mysteries of the Moon" where he spoke of mysterious happenings on the Moon ("flashes of light", "glints", "outgasing", and perhaps observing of meteor strikes on the Moon). For example here is a sentence from the book: "On September 26, 1788, Schroeter, while observing the crescent moon, saw a whitish bright spot, just like a star, suddenly shine out in the earthshine among the peaks of the Alps to the southeast of the crater Plato". Schroeter and others looked for this phenomena again but it was not seen by them again. Then on 01 Jan 1865 it was spotted again by another astronomer named Grover. I don't think it has been sighted again. Who knows what it was! But certainly if it was real then a high resolution survey of the moon might show evidence of something odd going on (if a result of ETI ...). Who knows, perhaps, there really is a "monolith" waiting there on the moon for us to find :-) There is still alot of interest, among amateur astronomers, of transient phenomena occuring on the moon. There is also the "lunatic fringe" (well adapted terminology of course. Lunar Transient Phenomena (LTP) is discussed (probably) in all books regarding the moon. See for example "Observing the Moon", by Gerald North, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0 521 62273 3 (hardback). Well, in summary, yes, it is a good idea to do a very detailed systematic search of the Moon ... Al Best regards Keith Larson |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
"Keith Larson" wrote in message
... Hi Everyone I am new to this newsgroup and figured I would chime in. What about looking on the moon? The moon might be a great place for ET to set up and observe from a distance. As an amateur astronomer I am asked many many times if we can see the Lunar Lander or the flag. This is of course beyond todays optics (especially mine) but glint reflections are easy. Just consider the retroreflector that was left behind by Apollo. Radar on the other hand should be able to resolve something like the LEM, and presumably something left behind by ET. So why not start with a systematic search of the moon? Ah! This brings back old memories! I remember as a young person being fascinated by the Moon and particularly by a book by H.P. Wilkins called "Our Moon" (I still have this book, dated 1954). He had a chapter tiltled "Mysteries of the Moon" where he spoke of mysterious happenings on the Moon ("flashes of light", "glints", "outgasing", and perhaps observing of meteor strikes on the Moon). For example here is a sentence from the book: "On September 26, 1788, Schroeter, while observing the crescent moon, saw a whitish bright spot, just like a star, suddenly shine out in the earthshine among the peaks of the Alps to the southeast of the crater Plato". Schroeter and others looked for this phenomena again but it was not seen by them again. Then on 01 Jan 1865 it was spotted again by another astronomer named Grover. I don't think it has been sighted again. Who knows what it was! But certainly if it was real then a high resolution survey of the moon might show evidence of something odd going on (if a result of ETI ...). Who knows, perhaps, there really is a "monolith" waiting there on the moon for us to find :-) There is still alot of interest, among amateur astronomers, of transient phenomena occuring on the moon. There is also the "lunatic fringe" (well adapted terminology of course. Lunar Transient Phenomena (LTP) is discussed (probably) in all books regarding the moon. See for example "Observing the Moon", by Gerald North, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0 521 62273 3 (hardback). Well, in summary, yes, it is a good idea to do a very detailed systematic search of the Moon ... Al Best regards Keith Larson |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Search for ET Probes
Keith Larson wrote in message ...
Hi Everyone I am new to this newsgroup and figured I would chime in. What about looking on the moon? The moon might be a great place for ET to set up and observe from a distance. As an amateur astronomer I am asked many many times if we can see the Lunar Lander or the flag. This is of course beyond todays optics (especially mine) but glint reflections are easy. Just consider the retroreflector that was left behind by Apollo. Radar on the other hand should be able to resolve something like the LEM, and presumably something left behind by ET. So why not start with a systematic search of the moon? The thing is that for you to find an intact probe on the moon it would require that probe to have made a controlled landing. I'd think that the odds of aliens setting a probe down there are very tiny compared to the chance of a dead probe that just happened to be cruising in our neighborood of the galaxy being captured by the sun's gravity. Chances of us finding and recognizing a probe that is not intact is zero, I think... since we have no clue what such a probe would look like absent obvious things like a radio dish or optics. Having said that, it'd be interesting to search the moon if we had a good idea of what to look for. For instance if we found a patch of the moon that was covered in tiny bits of some material that required intelligence to form it that'd be interesting -McDaniel |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mars Exploration and the Search for Life is a Priority Says UK ScienceMinister (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 29th 03 01:57 PM |
Search for dark matter intensifies (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 21st 03 05:28 PM |
NASA Releases Near-Earth Object Search Report | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 10th 03 04:39 PM |
Challenger/Columbia, here is your chance to gain a new convert! | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 38 | September 5th 03 07:48 PM |
3rd European Workshop on Exo/Astrobiology - Mars: The Search For Life | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 6th 03 06:16 PM |