|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Mar 8, 9:17*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 5, 2:40*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Feb 20, 9:44*am, Brad Guth wrote: The real David J. Tholen (David Tholen) knows better than most of us combined. *We are in fact tidal bound to the still massive Sirius star/ solar system (for the same reason little red and icy Sedna that's never closer than 76 AU isn't going anywhere), though not nearly as strongly as when that massive molecular cloud was only recently forming those extremely vibrant nearby stars, whereas the complex environment within our relatively passive solar system as well as that of Earth has been affected by this nearby source of gravity and energy. Unfortunately, the spooks, moles and clowns as the resident impostors of Usenet have no moral fiber between the entire lot of themselves, and the original owners of a given name are usually fully aware of this. *So why hasn't David Tholen or any other real Tholen spoken a good or bad word about their impostor? On the other hand, if I were in charge of running our NASA or DARPA according to the mutually perpetrated cold-war era, plus all the usual cloak and dagger ways of our past, present and future, whereas if our resident impostor ‘tholen’, Marty and of course those ‘seans’ didn’t already exist, as such I’d sure as hell invent as many brown-nosed impostors and rusemasters as possible (including faith-based clowns like Art Deco and Saul Levy), especially once this open Usenet method of global publishing went so easily public as a free-for-all investigative news and story telling medium that virtually everyone with half a brain (even if it’s K12 dysfunctional) has access to. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll), is simply offering further proofs that we're not alone, especially since our galaxy is clearly a composite of several dwarf galaxies and the likes of extremely newish stuff like the nearby Sirius star/solar system that isn’t a tenth as old as our solar system. The Newtonian example ratio of 8.3e7:1 (83 million to one) is exactly how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian binding force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with our 2005-VX3 being the little item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to the weak tidal force our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 83e6:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can replicate and take to your bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex level of biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial limited and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Zionist version of Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except of course for an artificially inflated price of whatever the market will bare). However, the Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll and a little from myself) are what’s most likely still in charge of whatever drives or motivates our global environment, at least to a much greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the general media and public ever gets to learn about. It seems that our extremely weak force of gravity attraction to the robust Sirius star/solar system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna is attracted to our sun, and yet others here keep insisting that supposedly somehow we're not in the least bit gravity or tidal radii associated to that impressive star system. What the hell gives? Sirius and us(our solar system) are very much indeed inseparable, at least according to those regular pesky laws of physics pertaining to the mainstream accepted notions of Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics, that seems way more than sufficient for everything else we’re told to accept, and especially if little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e14 m that’s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereas Sirius at 8.6 light years and worth 1.417e17 N (that’s roughly a 20 thousand fold stronger tidal radii grip), and to think that we’ve been gaining on this 3.5 solar mass of Sirius by 7.6 km/sec, plus most likely and unavoidably accelerating towards our next close cosmological encounter within a orbital period of 105,000 ~ 110,000 years, and previously more often as we go back in time. *It’s as though 65+ million years ago we were orbiting much closer to Sirius, and our environment especially influenced by the substantially large and vibrant spectrum of Sirius(B) wasn’t exactly none too dim. *~ BG All stars are highly magnetic items to start off with, and as they consume their fuel is when the intensity of their magnetic force increases substantially. *However, it seems as though 99.9% of public funded research that’s specifically pertaining to anything of Sirius is either forbidden or taboo/nondisclosure rated. It's almost as weird as our still not having any public funded objective science pertaining to raw ice existing/coexisting in the vacuum of 1 AU space, much less upon our physically dark and mineral saturated moon that’s seemingly more paramagnetic than Earth. *The earth-moon L1(Selene L1) should offer a vacuum of at least 3e-18 bar, although it's possibly worth as little as 3e-21 bar. *At such vacuum even the most cryogenic ice should boil off or rather sublime away rather quickly unless there some weird kind of molecular diamagnetic bonding going on. By stellar evolutionary rights, Sirius(B) that used to be a very big and vibrant sucker of 17e30 kg, should have become one hell of a magnet worth 1e61e9 gauss, and it seems likely that the Sirius(A) magnetic field is not exactly passive. *So, at best it’s an extremely intense magnetic field that's always existing between those two stars, whereas the pull of Sirius(B) has to win every time. *Eventually Sirius(B) should rebuild enough mass to once again either flashover and become a neutron star or merge with Sirius(A). *What could possibly go wrong for us outside of our heading towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and accelerating? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dwarf#Magnetic_field *“Since then magnetic fields have been discovered in well over 100 white dwarfs, ranging from 2×10e3 to10e9 gauss (0.2 T to 100 kT).” *Is there any reason to perceive that Sirius(B) isn’t extremely magnetic and pulling at everything within 10 AU? So the larger and older the star the more magnetar worthy they become, whereas the larger they started off is the most likely determination as to how potent that magnetic field eventually gets, and perhaps much like gravity there’s no outer limits as to the range of detecting that magnetic force. *Our passive sun currently offers an average 14 gauss/ m2 and those solar spots 3000 gauss (perhaps averaging 10 gauss compared to ours of 0.6 gauss), so you can imagine the what-if field intensity when a white dwarf becomes worth 1e9 gauss/m2. *Magnetars are of course much stronger, suggesting their original solar mass of 40+ that can produce a magnetar of 1e15 gauss. *~ BG Now that those laws of Newtonian physics are still clearly on my side of this argument, perhaps folks here can start to appreciate the greater value in what this association with the Sirius star/solar system has to do with us and our frail environment that takes so little to cause global freezing or thawing. At least as we get closer to Sirius we shouldn't freeze to death from any significant chance of glacial recovery, although heavier snow and rainfall plus tougher storms shouldn't be unexpected. ~ BG |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Mar 5, 2:40*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Feb 20, 9:44*am, Brad Guth wrote: The real David J. Tholen (David Tholen) knows better than most of us combined. *We are in fact tidal bound to the still massive Sirius star/ solar system (for the same reason little red and icy Sedna that's never closer than 76 AU isn't going anywhere), though not nearly as strongly as when that massive molecular cloud was only recently forming those extremely vibrant nearby stars, whereas the complex environment within our relatively passive solar system as well as that of Earth has been affected by this nearby source of gravity and energy. Unfortunately, the spooks, moles and clowns as the resident impostors of Usenet have no moral fiber between the entire lot of themselves, and the original owners of a given name are usually fully aware of this. *So why hasn't David Tholen or any other real Tholen spoken a good or bad word about their impostor? On the other hand, if I were in charge of running our NASA or DARPA according to the mutually perpetrated cold-war era, plus all the usual cloak and dagger ways of our past, present and future, whereas if our resident impostor ‘tholen’, Marty and of course those ‘seans’ didn’t already exist, as such I’d sure as hell invent as many brown-nosed impostors and rusemasters as possible (including faith-based clowns like Art Deco and Saul Levy), especially once this open Usenet method of global publishing went so easily public as a free-for-all investigative news and story telling medium that virtually everyone with half a brain (even if it’s K12 dysfunctional) has access to. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll), is simply offering further proofs that we're not alone, especially since our galaxy is clearly a composite of several dwarf galaxies and the likes of extremely newish stuff like the nearby Sirius star/solar system that isn’t a tenth as old as our solar system. The Newtonian example ratio of 8.3e7:1 (83 million to one) is exactly how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian binding force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with our 2005-VX3 being the little item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to the weak tidal force our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 83e6:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can replicate and take to your bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex level of biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial limited and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Zionist version of Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except of course for an artificially inflated price of whatever the market will bare). However, the Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll and a little from myself) are what’s most likely still in charge of whatever drives or motivates our global environment, at least to a much greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the general media and public ever gets to learn about. It seems that our extremely weak force of gravity attraction to the robust Sirius star/solar system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna is attracted to our sun, and yet others here keep insisting that supposedly somehow we're not in the least bit gravity or tidal radii associated to that impressive star system. What the hell gives? Sirius and us(our solar system) are very much indeed inseparable, at least according to those regular pesky laws of physics pertaining to the mainstream accepted notions of Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics, that seems way more than sufficient for everything else we’re told to accept, and especially if little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e14 m that’s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereas Sirius at 8.6 light years and worth 1.417e17 N (that’s roughly a 20 thousand fold stronger tidal radii grip), and to think that we’ve been gaining on this 3.5 solar mass of Sirius by 7.6 km/sec, plus most likely and unavoidably accelerating towards our next close cosmological encounter within a orbital period of 105,000 ~ 110,000 years, and previously more often as we go back in time. *It’s as though 65+ million years ago we were orbiting much closer to Sirius, and our environment especially influenced by the substantially large and vibrant spectrum of Sirius(B) wasn’t exactly none too dim. *~ BG Supposedly Sirius B that’s currently as massive as sol, roughly the size of Earth and spins at 23 rpm, should be making its magnetic field a whole lot easier to measure, however no such public archived measurement or even good swag seems to exist. It has been suggested; at least 10% of white dwarfs have 1e6 gauss/m2 to work with, and Sirius(B) is likely one of the more robust dwarfs that should easily exceed that base amount of compacted stellar magnetic intensity and possibly offer 1e9 gauss, thus making it easier to rebuild mass by collecting whatever nearby passing stuff and of course pulling hydrogen away from those terrific Sirius(A) CMEs and otherwise sucking up those regular protons and electrons from the Sirius(A) solar wind should get picked up and held by Sirius(B). ~ BG |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Mar 12, 6:01*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 5, 2:40*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Feb 20, 9:44*am, Brad Guth wrote: The real David J. Tholen (David Tholen) knows better than most of us combined. *We are in fact tidal bound to the still massive Sirius star/ solar system (for the same reason little red and icy Sedna that's never closer than 76 AU isn't going anywhere), though not nearly as strongly as when that massive molecular cloud was only recently forming those extremely vibrant nearby stars, whereas the complex environment within our relatively passive solar system as well as that of Earth has been affected by this nearby source of gravity and energy. Unfortunately, the spooks, moles and clowns as the resident impostors of Usenet have no moral fiber between the entire lot of themselves, and the original owners of a given name are usually fully aware of this. *So why hasn't David Tholen or any other real Tholen spoken a good or bad word about their impostor? On the other hand, if I were in charge of running our NASA or DARPA according to the mutually perpetrated cold-war era, plus all the usual cloak and dagger ways of our past, present and future, whereas if our resident impostor ‘tholen’, Marty and of course those ‘seans’ didn’t already exist, as such I’d sure as hell invent as many brown-nosed impostors and rusemasters as possible (including faith-based clowns like Art Deco and Saul Levy), especially once this open Usenet method of global publishing went so easily public as a free-for-all investigative news and story telling medium that virtually everyone with half a brain (even if it’s K12 dysfunctional) has access to. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll), is simply offering further proofs that we're not alone, especially since our galaxy is clearly a composite of several dwarf galaxies and the likes of extremely newish stuff like the nearby Sirius star/solar system that isn’t a tenth as old as our solar system. The Newtonian example ratio of 8.3e7:1 (83 million to one) is exactly how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian binding force, as having been attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with our 2005-VX3 being the little item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to the weak tidal force our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 83e6:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can replicate and take to your bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex level of biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial limited and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Zionist version of Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except of course for an artificially inflated price of whatever the market will bare). However, the Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll and a little from myself) are what’s most likely still in charge of whatever drives or motivates our global environment, at least to a much greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the general media and public ever gets to learn about. It seems that our extremely weak force of gravity attraction to the robust Sirius star/solar system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna is attracted to our sun, and yet others here keep insisting that supposedly somehow we're not in the least bit gravity or tidal radii associated to that impressive star system. What the hell gives? Sirius and us(our solar system) are very much indeed inseparable, at least according to those regular pesky laws of physics pertaining to the mainstream accepted notions of Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics, that seems way more than sufficient for everything else we’re told to accept, and especially if little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e14 m that’s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereas Sirius at 8.6 light years and worth 1.417e17 N (that’s roughly a 20 thousand fold stronger tidal radii grip), and to think that we’ve been gaining on this 3.5 solar mass of Sirius by 7.6 km/sec, plus most likely and unavoidably accelerating towards our next close cosmological encounter within a orbital period of 105,000 ~ 110,000 years, and previously more often as we go back in time. *It’s as though 65+ million years ago we were orbiting much closer to Sirius, and our environment especially influenced by the substantially large and vibrant spectrum of Sirius(B) wasn’t exactly none too dim. *~ BG Supposedly Sirius B that’s currently as massive as sol, roughly the size of Earth and spins at 23 rpm, should be making its magnetic field a whole lot easier to measure, however no such public archived measurement or even good swag seems to exist. *It has been suggested; at least 10% of white dwarfs have 1e6 gauss/m2 to work with, and Sirius(B) is likely one of the more robust dwarfs that should easily exceed that base amount of compacted stellar magnetic intensity and possibly offer 1e9 gauss, thus making it easier to rebuild mass by collecting whatever nearby passing stuff and of course pulling hydrogen away from those terrific Sirius(A) CMEs and otherwise sucking up those regular protons and electrons from the Sirius(A) solar wind should get picked up and held by Sirius(B). *~ BG Is there weird something about gravity that we're not supposed to know about? A somewhat related question: is the physics of quantum tunneling not allowed to function off-world? |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Mar 12, 6:01*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 5, 2:40*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Feb 20, 9:44*am, Brad Guth wrote: The real David J. Tholen (David Tholen) knows better than most of us combined. *We are in fact tidal bound to the still massiveSiriusstar/ solar system (for the same reason little red and icy Sedna that's never closer than 76 AU isn't going anywhere), though not nearly as strongly as when that massive molecular cloud was only recently forming those extremely vibrant nearby stars, whereas the complex environment within our relatively passive solar system as well as that of Earth has been affected by this nearby source of gravity and energy. Unfortunately, the spooks, moles and clowns as the resident impostors of Usenet have no moral fiber between the entire lot of themselves, and the original owners of a given name are usually fully aware of this. *So why hasn't David Tholen or any other real Tholen spoken a good or bad word about their impostor? On the other hand, if I were in charge of running our NASA or DARPA according to the mutually perpetrated cold-war era, plus all the usual cloak and dagger ways of our past, present and future, whereas if our resident impostor ‘tholen’, Marty and of course those ‘seans’ didn’t already exist, as such I’d sure as hell invent as many brown-nosed impostors and rusemasters as possible (including faith-based clowns like Art Deco and Saul Levy), especially once this open Usenet method of global publishing went so easily public as a free-for-all investigative news and story telling medium that virtually everyone with half a brain (even if it’s K12 dysfunctional) has access to. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll), is simply offering further proofs that we're not alone, especially since our galaxy is clearly a composite of several dwarf galaxies and the likes of extremely newish stuff like the nearbySiriusstar/solar system that isn’t a tenth as old as our solar system. The Newtonian example ratio of 8.3e7:1 (83 million to one) is exactly how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian binding force, as having been attracted to the existingSiriusstar/solar system, than otherwise associated with our 2005-VX3 being the little item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to the weak tidal force our sun. *ThisSirius:XV3 ratio of 83e6:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can replicate and take to your bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex level of biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial limited and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Zionist version of Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except of course for an artificially inflated price of whatever the market will bare). However, the Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll and a little from myself) are what’s most likely still in charge of whatever drives or motivates our global environment, at least to a much greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the general media and public ever gets to learn about. It seems that our extremely weak force of gravity attraction to the robustSiriusstar/solar system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna is attracted to our sun, and yet others here keep insisting that supposedly somehow we're not in the least bit gravity or tidal radii associated to that impressive star system. What the hell gives? Siriusand us(our solar system) are very much indeed inseparable, at least according to those regular pesky laws of physics pertaining to the mainstream accepted notions of Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics, that seems way more than sufficient for everything else we’re told to accept, and especially if little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e14 m that’s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereasSiriusat 8.6 light years and worth 1.417e17 N (that’s roughly a 20 thousand fold stronger tidal radii grip), and to think that we’ve been gaining on this 3.5 solar mass ofSiriusby 7.6 km/sec, plus most likely and unavoidably accelerating towards our next close cosmological encounter within a orbital period of 105,000 ~ 110,000 years, and previously more often as we go back in time. *It’s as though 65+ million years ago we were orbiting much closer toSirius, and our environment especially influenced by the substantially large and vibrant spectrum ofSirius(B) wasn’t exactly none too dim. *~ BG SupposedlySiriusB that’s currently as massive as sol, roughly the size of Earth and spins at 23 rpm, should be making its magnetic field a whole lot easier to measure, however no such public archived measurement or even good swag seems to exist. *It has been suggested; at least 10% of white dwarfs have 1e6 gauss/m2 to work with, andSirius(B) is likely one of the more robust dwarfs that should easily exceed that base amount of compacted stellar magnetic intensity and possibly offer 1e9 gauss, thus making it easier to rebuild mass by collecting whatever nearby passing stuff and of course pulling hydrogen away from those terrificSirius(A) CMEs and otherwise sucking up those regular protons and electrons from theSirius(A) solar wind should get picked up and held bySirius(B). *~ BG Lagrange Point Finder (works for stars) http://www.orbitsimulator.com/formul...intFinder.html Gravitational Force Calculator (works for stars) http://www.calculatoredge.com/chemic...vitational.htm |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Mar 13, 10:46*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 12, 6:01*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 5, 2:40*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Feb 20, 9:44*am, Brad Guth wrote: The real David J. Tholen (David Tholen) knows better than most of us combined. *We are in fact tidal bound to the still massiveSiriusstar/ solar system (for the same reason little red and icy Sedna that's never closer than 76 AU isn't going anywhere), though not nearly as strongly as when that massive molecular cloud was only recently forming those extremely vibrant nearby stars, whereas the complex environment within our relatively passive solar system as well as that of Earth has been affected by this nearby source of gravity and energy. Unfortunately, the spooks, moles and clowns as the resident impostors of Usenet have no moral fiber between the entire lot of themselves, and the original owners of a given name are usually fully aware of this. *So why hasn't David Tholen or any other real Tholen spoken a good or bad word about their impostor? On the other hand, if I were in charge of running our NASA or DARPA according to the mutually perpetrated cold-war era, plus all the usual cloak and dagger ways of our past, present and future, whereas if our resident impostor ‘tholen’, Marty and of course those ‘seans’ didn’t already exist, as such I’d sure as hell invent as many brown-nosed impostors and rusemasters as possible (including faith-based clowns like Art Deco and Saul Levy), especially once this open Usenet method of global publishing went so easily public as a free-for-all investigative news and story telling medium that virtually everyone with half a brain (even if it’s K12 dysfunctional) has access to. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll), is simply offering further proofs that we're not alone, especially since our galaxy is clearly a composite of several dwarf galaxies and the likes of extremely newish stuff like the nearbySiriusstar/solar system that isn’t a tenth as old as our solar system. The Newtonian example ratio of 8.3e7:1 (83 million to one) is exactly how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian binding force, as having been attracted to the existingSiriusstar/solar system, than otherwise associated with our 2005-VX3 being the little item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to the weak tidal force our sun. *ThisSirius:XV3 ratio of 83e6:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can replicate and take to your bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex level of biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial limited and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Zionist version of Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except of course for an artificially inflated price of whatever the market will bare). However, the Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll and a little from myself) are what’s most likely still in charge of whatever drives or motivates our global environment, at least to a much greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the general media and public ever gets to learn about. It seems that our extremely weak force of gravity attraction to the robustSiriusstar/solar system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna is attracted to our sun, and yet others here keep insisting that supposedly somehow we're not in the least bit gravity or tidal radii associated to that impressive star system. What the hell gives? Siriusand us(our solar system) are very much indeed inseparable, at least according to those regular pesky laws of physics pertaining to the mainstream accepted notions of Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics, that seems way more than sufficient for everything else we’re told to accept, and especially if little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e14 m that’s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereasSiriusat 8.6 light years and worth 1.417e17 N (that’s roughly a 20 thousand fold stronger tidal radii grip), and to think that we’ve been gaining on this 3.5 solar mass ofSiriusby 7.6 km/sec, plus most likely and unavoidably accelerating towards our next close cosmological encounter within a orbital period of 105,000 ~ 110,000 years, and previously more often as we go back in time. *It’s as though 65+ million years ago we were orbiting much closer toSirius, and our environment especially influenced by the substantially large and vibrant spectrum ofSirius(B) wasn’t exactly none too dim. *~ BG SupposedlySiriusB that’s currently as massive as sol, roughly the size of Earth and spins at 23 rpm, should be making its magnetic field a whole lot easier to measure, however no such public archived measurement or even good swag seems to exist. *It has been suggested; at least 10% of white dwarfs have 1e6 gauss/m2 to work with, and Sirius(B) is likely one of the more robust dwarfs that should easily exceed that base amount of compacted stellar magnetic intensity and possibly offer 1e9 gauss, thus making it easier to rebuild mass by collecting whatever nearby passing stuff and of course pulling hydrogen away from those terrificSirius(A) CMEs and otherwise sucking up those regular protons and electrons from theSirius(A) solar wind should get picked up and held bySirius(B). *~ BG Is there weird something about gravity that we're not supposed to know about? A somewhat related question: *is the physics of quantum tunneling not allowed to function off-world? Gravitational Force Calculator (works for stars) http://www.calculatoredge.com/chemic...vitational.htm Lagrange Point Finder (works for stars) http://www.orbitsimulator.com/formul...intFinder.html Centripetal force (works for stars) http://www.mill-creek-systems.com/se/SEGravity.htm http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/cf.html Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Mar 16, 9:18*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 12, 6:01*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 5, 2:40*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Feb 20, 9:44*am, Brad Guth wrote: The real David J. Tholen (David Tholen) knows better than most of us combined. *We are in fact tidal bound to the still massiveSiriusstar/ solar system (for the same reason little red and icy Sedna that's never closer than 76 AU isn't going anywhere), though not nearly as strongly as when that massive molecular cloud was only recently forming those extremely vibrant nearby stars, whereas the complex environment within our relatively passive solar system as well as that of Earth has been affected by this nearby source of gravity and energy. Unfortunately, the spooks, moles and clowns as the resident impostors of Usenet have no moral fiber between the entire lot of themselves, and the original owners of a given name are usually fully aware of this. *So why hasn't David Tholen or any other real Tholen spoken a good or bad word about their impostor? On the other hand, if I were in charge of running our NASA or DARPA according to the mutually perpetrated cold-war era, plus all the usual cloak and dagger ways of our past, present and future, whereas if our resident impostor ‘tholen’, Marty and of course those ‘seans’ didn’t already exist, as such I’d sure as hell invent as many brown-nosed impostors and rusemasters as possible (including faith-based clowns like Art Deco and Saul Levy), especially once this open Usenet method of global publishing went so easily public as a free-for-all investigative news and story telling medium that virtually everyone with half a brain (even if it’s K12 dysfunctional) has access to. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll), is simply offering further proofs that we're not alone, especially since our galaxy is clearly a composite of several dwarf galaxies and the likes of extremely newish stuff like the nearbySiriusstar/solar system that isn’t a tenth as old as our solar system. The Newtonian example ratio of 8.3e7:1 (83 million to one) is exactly how much greater our solar system remains via Newtonian binding force, as having been attracted to the existingSiriusstar/solar system, than otherwise associated with our 2005-VX3 being the little item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever attracted to the weak tidal force our sun. *ThisSirius:XV3 ratio of 83e6:1 is just another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you and others can replicate and take to your bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating any complex level of biodiversity, and everything about our environment is strictly terrestrial limited and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with human or external factors because, apparently their Zionist version of Eden/Earth has been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as is, except of course for an artificially inflated price of whatever the market will bare). However, the Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll and a little from myself) are what’s most likely still in charge of whatever drives or motivates our global environment, at least to a much greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the general media and public ever gets to learn about. It seems that our extremely weak force of gravity attraction to the robustSiriusstar/solar system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna is attracted to our sun, and yet others here keep insisting that supposedly somehow we're not in the least bit gravity or tidal radii associated to that impressive star system. What the hell gives? Siriusand us(our solar system) are very much indeed inseparable, at least according to those regular pesky laws of physics pertaining to the mainstream accepted notions of Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics, that seems way more than sufficient for everything else we’re told to accept, and especially if little Sedna can be turned around at a tidal radii of 1.459e14 m that’s worth merely 2.975e13 N, whereasSiriusat 8.6 light years and worth 1.417e17 N (that’s roughly a 20 thousand fold stronger tidal radii grip), and to think that we’ve been gaining on this 3.5 solar mass ofSiriusby 7.6 km/sec, plus most likely and unavoidably accelerating towards our next close cosmological encounter within a orbital period of 105,000 ~ 110,000 years, and previously more often as we go back in time. *It’s as though 65+ million years ago we were orbiting much closer toSirius, and our environment especially influenced by the substantially large and vibrant spectrum ofSirius(B) wasn’t exactly none too dim. *~ BG SupposedlySiriusB that’s currently as massive as sol, roughly the size of Earth and spins at 23 rpm, should be making its magnetic field a whole lot easier to measure, however no such public archived measurement or even good swag seems to exist. *It has been suggested; at least 10% of white dwarfs have 1e6 gauss/m2 to work with, andSirius(B) is likely one of the more robust dwarfs that should easily exceed that base amount of compacted stellar magnetic intensity and possibly offer 1e9 gauss, thus making it easier to rebuild mass by collecting whatever nearby passing stuff and of course pulling hydrogen away from those terrificSirius(A) CMEs and otherwise sucking up those regular protons and electrons from theSirius(A) solar wind should get picked up and held bySirius(B). *~ BG Lagrange Point Finder (works for stars) *http://www.orbitsimulator.com/formul...intFinder.html *Gravitational Force Calculator (works for stars) *http://www.calculatoredge.com/chemic...vitational.htm In other words, what's keeping us (our solar system) from being gravity/tidal linked to the Sirius star system? We're sure as hell not expanding/migrating ourselves further away from Sirius. Lagrange Point Finder (works for stars or anything molecular) http://www.orbitsimulator.com/formul...intFinder.html Gravitational Force Calculator (works for stars or anything molecular) http://www.calculatoredge.com/chemic...vitational.htm ~ BG |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Feb 10, 9:22*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 28, wrote: On Jan 14, wrote: On Jan 13, wrote: On Dec 25 2009, 8:53*pm, "Yubiwan" wrote: There are a number of things that can attack a star system, Saul. We recently cut a hole in a noxious gas cloud that would have decimated Earth and killed us all. We frequently change the orbits of meteoroids that would harm Earth and its life. When comets come close we monitor them for the deadliness of the half-life they have aboard. And many other unimaginable deadly events are cancelled by us. -- Yubiwan Be well and come... be welcome! Where's the supposed evidence that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms and its subsequent stars never had an impact/influence upon our solar system? What would an honest Sean Rothschild like yourself know and be willing to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have with the Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's original stellar mass? *BradGuth, Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet Have the Newtonian laws of gravity been revoked? Where's the supposed evidence or even subjective conditional physics that the terrific Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms, and that of its subsequent vibrant stars never had an impact/influence upon our solar system? What would an honest Sean Rothschild like "Yubiwan" or "Darla" know and/or be willing to share about this tidal gravity association that we must still have with the remaining Sirius star/solar system, that's currently only a fraction of it's original 12.5 stellar mass? *~ BG Is "uk.sci.astronomy" in a coma? Apparently those Newtonian laws do not apply to my stuff. A pair of universes or galactic super-groups, if say each worth 3e60 kg and situated 30e9 light years apart (2.84e26 m) = 7.4427e57 Newtons worth of gravitational force or tidal binding radial influence, as such seems perfectly likely enough that our visible/detectable universe of supposedly 13.5 billion years radii should logically be affected, especially if we're surrounded by multiple other such masses that remain as external to whatever our best detection technology can muster. http://www.calculatoredge.com/chemic...vitational.htm Even with universes of 3e60 kg separated by 300e9 light years is still an impressive 7.4427e55 Newtons hard at work. Playing around with reducing the M2 mass and the distance is even more interesting, as well as easily 3D simulated via computers that’ll make everything seemingly come to life. Possibly our universe has an event horizon or carbon/carbonado populated Oort zone kind of outer photon blocking shell of molecular dark matter (similar to Barnard 68) that's keeping us from seeing whatever is external, or perhaps it’s merely similar to whatever's keeping us from seeing through or inside that of any black hole. What if space that involves our universe is no longer expanding, but instead merely distorting or retarding itself, and even conceivably as having been retracting as of a few billion years ago? (of course with our best methods at hand, we’d never know for certain because of that relative slow velocity of light) The slowing of photons (increasing the unclear path and resistance that photons must travel) makes as much sense as any forever expanding universe theory. Cosmic carbon and perhaps carbonado do seem to get in the way of most photons, as well as the diamagnetic properties of hydrogen and perhaps even helium can't be ignored when there's always at least trillions upon trillions of those two and a few other elements in the pathway of most any given photon (possibly up to 1e30 atoms existing between us and the furthest minute speck that our best space deployed telescopes can record as a dull/far IR that most likely isn't that of an IR spectrum source to begin with, unless everything furthest away has simply aged-out and thus having evolved into galaxies of red giants that’ll eventually evolve into galaxies of white dwarfs, magnetars and neutron stars before ending up as spent black dwarfs). Open intergalactic space is typically free of rogue molecular elements, with perhaps as few as hosting one hydrogen atom/m3. However, there’s always places along a given light year path where it’s anything but so empty. Vast molecular clouds and other dark matter are not exactly devoid of offering a great many atoms/cm3 (1e3/cm3, with some core densities 1e6/cm3 that’ll block/filter the brightest of stars) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_cloud In other words, how can a photon not be slowed down over the greater distances that Hubble utilizes as supporting their cosmic redshift and thereby fortifying their forever expanding/receding universe theory (Hubble constant), that which my better looking ghost writer, Alan Guth, published as his hypothetical theory that’s based entirely upon the supposed constant velocity of light? Related questions: How well could photons from a star like Sirius(A) manage to get through a viewing window or narrow waveguide/conduit of a cm2 x 13.5e9 light year (1.28e26 m) gauntlet of 1e30 assorted atoms? Same question, except along with our having a dark molecular cloud such as Barnard 68 parked in the way? One kg of solid gold offers 3.057e27 atoms, thus 327 kg worth of a solid gold pathway is certainly going to affect the velocity and propagation or migration efficiency of a photon, unless it’s of a Planck wavelength that isn’t bothered by any pathway mass of 1e30 atoms. In other words, between us and those most distant objects there's lensing and mirroring as well as resistance and attenuating of photons taking place, not to mention those forces of gravity existing from all directions that's supposedly pulling us apart. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:34 PM |