A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Gus Grissom's son



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old June 18th 13, 07:57 PM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:15:20 AM UTC-7, Dean wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 1:50:52 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:

Fred is never here to help, perhaps because he likes every unavoidable death that our DARPA and NASA can muster, not to mention the revenge Karma like his 9-11 created for us, is what makes Fred a happy camper.




At least Fred doesn't make **** up like you do. Oh hey, you never did answer that question: Do you believe the Apollo moon landings were faked?


I'll offer the exact same answer as the previous thousand times. Why should I have to lie in order to make you and Fred happy campers?

Obviously the whole truth and nothing but the truth os a policy doesn't set well with those of your public-funded kind.

Are you actually suggesting that our government agencies have never obfuscated/excluded evidence, especially when allowing such evidence disclosure could be easily interpreted as for disclosing issues they'd rather we not know about?

Do you have the name(s) of any government agency or contracted service that has always been 100% honest and trustworthy?
  #22  
Old June 18th 13, 08:02 PM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:16:01 AM UTC-7, Dean wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:35 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:


Good thing that Operation Paperclip had managed to save so many SS Nazis from getting convicted of crimes against humanity, even though most were Jewish Nazis.




Ahhh, there's racist Brad again.


How exactly is the whole truth and nothing but the truth "racist"?

Are you actually suggesting there were no such Jewish Nazis? (especially those of the oligarch caste)

  #23  
Old June 18th 13, 09:17 PM posted to sci.space.history
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Jun 18, 2:15*pm, Dean wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 1:50:52 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Monday, June 17, 2013 10:57:35 PM UTC-7, bob haller wrote:


On Jun 18, 1:20*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:


bob haller wrote:


On Jun 17, 5:12*pm, Brad Guth wrote:


On Saturday, June 15, 2013 8:05:10 AM UTC-7, bob haller wrote:


On Jun 14, 8:45*pm, Brad Guth wrote:


On Friday, September 19, 2003 5:39:36 AM UTC-7, wrote:


Dean wrote in message . ..


x-archive-yes:no


If Gus Grissom could, I would love to see him return and slap the ****


out of Scott. If he were my son, I would make a deal with the devil to


do it. Scott has made a mockery of the Grissom name and made a fool


out of himself. Go away, Scott you have done enough damage to the


great Gus Grissom and you should be ashamed.


* * * * * *golly gee, my feelings are so hurt. boo hoo. and you can


kiss my ass, dean.


They mean well, as long as you consider Hitler and his Zionist Nazis as really nifty kinda guys.


If you're still with us, come back and toss in a few topics for us to share our mutual distrust of the mainstream status quo.


I met scott at a apollo one memorial service at what remains of the


pad.


Scott was a nice guy who lives with a tradgery........


Indeed, and a very easily preventable death of his father at that.

  #24  
Old June 19th 13, 04:50 AM posted to sci.space.history
Greg \(Strider\) Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default Gus Grissom's son

"bob haller" wrote in message
...

On Jun 18, 7:56 am, Dean wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:00:16 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:
in addition a flight surgeon is present during all operations.


apollo one workers prevented medics from checking the crew fopr a long


time after the fire..


like half hour or hour, because the booster was classified.....


Really Bob? Can you prove that?


its in the accident report and one of scotts complaint



Great. Page number and paragraph from the report.

Yes, I think you'll find the medics couldn't get to the bodies for a period
of time. The capsule was still VERY hot. And what would the point have been
done (or to quote Mrs. Clinton "What difference would it have made?").
Sadly the crew was dead within minutes. An extra 30 minutes or 300 minutes
wouldn't have made a difference.

And again, since you have no experience apparently, I'll tell you one of the
first rules of a rescue, let alone a recovery is MAKE NO MORE PATIENTS.

Yes, apparently some pad crew burned their hands trying to get the capsule
open, but once it was clear that nothing could be done, there was no point
in risking lives further.



--
Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net

  #25  
Old June 19th 13, 02:05 PM posted to sci.space.history
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Jun 18, 11:50*pm, "Greg \(Strider\) Moore"
wrote:
"bob haller" *wrote in message

...







On Jun 18, 7:56 am, Dean wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:00:16 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:
in addition a flight surgeon is present during all operations.


apollo one workers prevented medics from checking the crew fopr a long


time after the fire..


like half hour or hour, because the booster was classified.....


Really Bob? *Can you prove that?


its in the accident report and one of scotts complaint


Great. *Page number and paragraph from the report.

Yes, I think you'll find the medics couldn't get to the bodies for a period
of time. The capsule was still VERY hot. *And what would the point have been
done (or to quote Mrs. Clinton "What difference would it have made?").
Sadly the crew was dead within minutes. *An extra 30 minutes or 300 minutes
wouldn't have made a difference.

And again, since you have no experience apparently, I'll tell you one of the
first rules of a rescue, let alone a recovery is MAKE NO MORE PATIENTS.

Yes, apparently some pad crew burned their hands trying to get the capsule
open, but once it was clear that nothing could be done, there was no point
in risking lives further.

--
Greg D. Moore * * * * * * * * *http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses.http://www.quicr.net


they werent permitted because of pad security issues. since the
booster was a military one..

sad as apollo one was, it helped pave the way for the moon landings.
  #26  
Old June 19th 13, 03:22 PM posted to sci.space.history
Greg \(Strider\) Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default Gus Grissom's son

"bob haller" wrote in message
...

On Jun 18, 11:50 pm, "Greg \(Strider\) Moore"
wrote:
"bob haller" wrote in message

...







On Jun 18, 7:56 am, Dean wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:00:16 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:
in addition a flight surgeon is present during all operations.


apollo one workers prevented medics from checking the crew fopr a
long


time after the fire..


like half hour or hour, because the booster was classified.....


Really Bob? Can you prove that?


its in the accident report and one of scotts complaint


Great. Page number and paragraph from the report.

Yes, I think you'll find the medics couldn't get to the bodies for a
period
of time. The capsule was still VERY hot. And what would the point have
been
done (or to quote Mrs. Clinton "What difference would it have made?").
Sadly the crew was dead within minutes. An extra 30 minutes or 300
minutes
wouldn't have made a difference.

And again, since you have no experience apparently, I'll tell you one of
the
first rules of a rescue, let alone a recovery is MAKE NO MORE PATIENTS.

Yes, apparently some pad crew burned their hands trying to get the
capsule
open, but once it was clear that nothing could be done, there was no
point
in risking lives further.

--
Greg D. Moore
http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses.http://www.quicr.net


they werent permitted because of pad security issues. since the
booster was a military one..


Bull**** Bob.

The Saturn IB was NOT a military vehicle. It was a NASA booster through and
through.


sad as apollo one was, it helped pave the way for the moon landings.



--
Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net

  #27  
Old June 19th 13, 04:43 PM posted to sci.space.history
Dean
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:05:49 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:
On Jun 18, 11:50*pm, "Greg \(Strider\) Moore"

wrote:

"bob haller" *wrote in message




....
















On Jun 18, 7:56 am, Dean wrote:


On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:00:16 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:


in addition a flight surgeon is present during all operations.




apollo one workers prevented medics from checking the crew fopr a long




time after the fire..




like half hour or hour, because the booster was classified.....




Really Bob? *Can you prove that?




its in the accident report and one of scotts complaint




Great. *Page number and paragraph from the report.




Yes, I think you'll find the medics couldn't get to the bodies for a period


of time. The capsule was still VERY hot. *And what would the point have been


done (or to quote Mrs. Clinton "What difference would it have made?").


Sadly the crew was dead within minutes. *An extra 30 minutes or 300 minutes


wouldn't have made a difference.




And again, since you have no experience apparently, I'll tell you one of the


first rules of a rescue, let alone a recovery is MAKE NO MORE PATIENTS.




Yes, apparently some pad crew burned their hands trying to get the capsule


open, but once it was clear that nothing could be done, there was no point


in risking lives further.




--


Greg D. Moore * * * * * * * * *http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/


CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses.http://www.quicr.net




they werent permitted because of pad security issues. since the

booster was a military one..



sad as apollo one was, it helped pave the way for the moon landings.


The Saturn 1B was military? Really? I'm calling bull**** and requiring you to prove that one.
  #28  
Old June 19th 13, 06:55 PM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:22:52 AM UTC-7, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
"bob haller" wrote in message

...



On Jun 18, 11:50 pm, "Greg \(Strider\) Moore"


wrote:


"bob haller" wrote in message




...
















On Jun 18, 7:56 am, Dean wrote:


On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:00:16 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:


in addition a flight surgeon is present during all operations.




apollo one workers prevented medics from checking the crew fopr a


long




time after the fire..




like half hour or hour, because the booster was classified.....




Really Bob? Can you prove that?




its in the accident report and one of scotts complaint




Great. Page number and paragraph from the report.




Yes, I think you'll find the medics couldn't get to the bodies for a


period


of time. The capsule was still VERY hot. And what would the point have


been


done (or to quote Mrs. Clinton "What difference would it have made?").


Sadly the crew was dead within minutes. An extra 30 minutes or 300


minutes


wouldn't have made a difference.




And again, since you have no experience apparently, I'll tell you one of


the


first rules of a rescue, let alone a recovery is MAKE NO MORE PATIENTS.




Yes, apparently some pad crew burned their hands trying to get the


capsule


open, but once it was clear that nothing could be done, there was no


point


in risking lives further.




--


Greg D. Moore


http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/


CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses.http://www.quicr.net




they werent permitted because of pad security issues. since the


booster was a military one..




Bull**** Bob.


The Saturn IB was NOT a military vehicle. It was a NASA booster through and

through.



sad as apollo one was, it helped pave the way for the moon landings.



--

Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/

CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net


It was actually an "Operation Paperclip" booster, of pure ZNR expertise.
  #29  
Old June 19th 13, 07:23 PM posted to sci.space.history
Dean
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 323
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:55:18 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:22:52 AM UTC-7, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:

"bob haller" wrote in message




...








On Jun 18, 11:50 pm, "Greg \(Strider\) Moore"




wrote:




"bob haller" wrote in message








...
































On Jun 18, 7:56 am, Dean wrote:




On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:00:16 AM UTC-4, bob haller wrote:




in addition a flight surgeon is present during all operations.








apollo one workers prevented medics from checking the crew fopr a




long








time after the fire..








like half hour or hour, because the booster was classified.....








Really Bob? Can you prove that?








its in the accident report and one of scotts complaint








Great. Page number and paragraph from the report.








Yes, I think you'll find the medics couldn't get to the bodies for a




period




of time. The capsule was still VERY hot. And what would the point have




been




done (or to quote Mrs. Clinton "What difference would it have made?").




Sadly the crew was dead within minutes. An extra 30 minutes or 300




minutes




wouldn't have made a difference.








And again, since you have no experience apparently, I'll tell you one of




the




first rules of a rescue, let alone a recovery is MAKE NO MORE PATIENTS.








Yes, apparently some pad crew burned their hands trying to get the




capsule




open, but once it was clear that nothing could be done, there was no




point




in risking lives further.








--




Greg D. Moore




http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/




CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses.http://www.quicr.net








they werent permitted because of pad security issues. since the




booster was a military one..








Bull**** Bob.






The Saturn IB was NOT a military vehicle. It was a NASA booster through and




through.








sad as apollo one was, it helped pave the way for the moon landings.






--




Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/




CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net




It was actually an "Operation Paperclip" booster, of pure ZNR expertise.


The ZNR are watching YOU now.
  #30  
Old June 20th 13, 01:47 AM posted to sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Gus Grissom's son

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:23:08 AM UTC-7, Dean wrote:
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:55:18 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:

It was actually an "Operation Paperclip" booster, of pure ZNR expertise.



The ZNR are watching YOU now.


No doubt whatsoever. Actually, those DARPA/NASA ZNRs did a damn fine job, and then they vanished because of who they really were.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gus Grissoms Two Assholes Evil Man Policy 0 January 27th 04 03:48 PM
Gus Grissoms Two Assholes Anonymous Space Shuttle 4 January 27th 04 01:44 PM
Shuttle Explosive Bolts & Grissom's Experience in Mercury Steven D. Litvintchouk Space Shuttle 2 August 22nd 03 05:11 PM
Scott Grissoms site Hallerb History 2 July 26th 03 04:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.