A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

There are no black holes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 13th 07, 07:25 PM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 655
Default There are no black holes

There are no black holes as the energy that would suck everything in,
distributes
on the disk. Rather than a round solar object becoming gravitational,
the energy
instread gravitationally tightens to a disk extending out to great
distances.
Its as if the Sun would tighten out solar system's disk. In this disk
matter breaks
into gas and dust, and the whole environment whirls in the visible
domain.

Einstein did predict that nothing can go faster than light, and passing
the event horizon one would arrive to a place where an object would
accelerate
above the speed of light. It is the law of nature.

  #2  
Old January 13th 07, 10:16 PM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 655
Default There are no black holes

There are no black holes as the energy that would suck everything in,
distributes
on the disk. Rather than a round solar object becoming gravitational,
the energy
instread gravitationally tightens to a disk extending out to great
distances.
Its as if the Sun would tighten out solar system's disk. In this disk
matter breaks
into gas and dust, and the whole environment whirls in the visible
domain.

Einstein did predict that nothing can go faster than light, and passing
the event horizon one would arrive to a place where an object would
accelerate
above the speed of light. It is the law of nature.


That a black hole.

That it is a white hole.

That upon approaching the event horizon, dark energy arises that warps
space of freefalling
energy. A warp in space is gravitational, bends light. An
anti-gravitational phenomena.
Mass and light heading straight toward a black hole would not enter the
region and
would find its place as gas and dust in the visible domain orbiting the
white hole.

That with immense dark energies present balancing the energy of the
black hole and
keeping freefalling energy out, one finds the heart of a swirling
energy system where
gravity is near annihilated by dark energies.

That a simple model arises that shows that the production of dark
energy expands the
Universe. What is produced is space in a high-energy accelerator.

That the region in the center is a high-pressure vaccum zone whose
density is greater than
the density of matter, but this region may produce matter shooting out
in north and
south directions.

  #3  
Old January 14th 07, 02:28 AM posted to sci.astro
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default There are no black holes

Dear gb6726:

wrote in message
ups.com...
There are no black holes as the energy that would
suck everything in,


Newton also provides for black holes. With Einstein gravity does
not "suck everything in", only Hoovers do that.

distributes on the disk. Rather than a round solar
object becoming gravitational, the energy instread
gravitationally tightens to a disk extending out to
great distances.


Frame dragging is cool, isn't it?

Its as if the Sun would tighten out solar system's
disk. In this disk matter breaks into gas and dust,
and the whole environment whirls in the visible
domain.


Roche limit. Some things can be broken up by gravity, but only
if they are within a certain range.

Einstein did predict that nothing can go faster than
light, and passing the event horizon one would arrive
to a place where an object would accelerate above
the speed of light.


Maybe. Maybe we'd go exactly the speed of light... on the time
axis. Oh wait, we're already doing that!

It is the law of nature.


As far as we can tell, with our butts firmly tied to the place of
our birth anyway.

That a black hole.

That it is a white hole.

That upon approaching the event horizon, dark energy
arises that warps space of freefalling energy. A warp
in space is gravitational, bends light. An anti-
gravitational phenomena.


Dark energy is not evident in local systems... only outside our
local cluster, for example.

Mass and light heading straight toward a black hole
would not enter the region and would find its place as
gas and dust in the visible domain orbiting the white
hole.


No white holes found. Yet.

That with immense dark energies present balancing
the energy of the black hole and keeping freefalling
energy out, one finds the heart of a swirling energy
system where gravity is near annihilated by dark
energies.


Good weed, dude.

That a simple model arises that shows that the
production of dark energy expands the Universe.
What is produced is space in a high-energy
accelerator.

That the region in the center is a high-pressure
vaccum zone whose density is greater than the
density of matter, but this region may produce
matter shooting out in north and south directions.


Really good weed. And I know where you get the fertilizer!

David A. Smith


  #4  
Old January 14th 07, 04:01 PM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 655
Default There are no black holes

Mass and light heading straight toward a black hole
would not enter the region and would find its place as
gas and dust in the visible domain orbiting the white
hole.


No white holes found. Yet.


Actually yes. The radiation readings into the center of a spiral
galaxy where a super-massive black hole was expected,
a scientist separating radiation signals for years found that
no radiation arrives right from the center of the galaxy, while
black hole theories predicted the galaxy's nucleus to have
a massive source of radiation.

Even if I proposed that pressure in the eye of the galaxy would
produce matter as the pressure of vaccum in a place where
there would be a black hole is equal to the pressure of atoms
(Einstein's theory of relativity works well with light, so at least
electrons should be generated), we find something that only
nuclear physicists might understand, Hawkings volunteered.

But this is theoretical.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Black holes: Saddam holes [email protected] Astronomy Misc 7 May 14th 06 05:10 AM
No More Black Holes Joe Fischer Astronomy Misc 7 December 13th 05 12:44 PM
Black Holes Aren't So Black (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 2 October 5th 05 10:57 PM
Black Holes Aren't So Black (Forwarded) Andrew Yee News 0 October 3rd 05 03:49 PM
Black Holes Q? Burt History 16 January 7th 05 03:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.