The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity

It was inevitable that if there were found to be serious flaws in our
physics and in our understanding of gravity or such things as
'momentum' these would be quickly revealed beginning in the early
1970s, when human beings first began to explore space.
A new summation of this theory and a set of proposed experiments to
test the predictions of the Unified Field Theory is found here..
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/new_physics.html

On Feb 26, 12:24 pm, bkh99 wrote:
It was inevitable that if there were found to be serious flaws in our
physics and in our understanding of gravity or such things as
'momentum' these would be quickly revealed beginning in the early
1970s, when human beings first began to explore space.
A new summation of this theory and a set of proposed experiments to
test the predictions of the Unified Field Theory is found here..http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/new_physics.html

I find this topic of "The Pioneer Effect, and a New Theory of Gravity"
extremely interesting if not entirely informative, which means that
all the rest of Usenet will either ignore it or proceed to topic/
author stalk, bash and/or summarily banish this topic.

http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/new_physics.html
"According to both Newton and Einstein, the Pioneer spacecraft should
'conserve momentum', which means that they should coast through space
at a constant speed and perhaps reach some far off galaxy in one
billion years from now. It is this expectation of constant endless
coasting at a constant unchanging speed that led the creators of the
two space probes to include a message to some alien species on plaques
attached to the two spacecraft, a classic example of Newtonian
thinking as well as being evidence that the theory of General
Relativity which describes gravity as 'matter based' is erroneous as
well. The two spacecraft are behaving like hydrogen or helium. They
are behaving like a weather balloon does when released into a
gravitational field."

"The two space craft are both decelerating as they rise in the
gravitational field, and the rate of deceleration is found to be the
speed of light multiplied by Hubble's constant, a very significant
result, for it also means that Einstein was wrong about the speed of
light. Newton was wrong about 'momentum'. Momentum is not a 'conserved
property'. Momentum is relative to the position in a gravitational
field in which it is measured. The speed of light is not constant. The
speed of light is relative to the position in a gravitational field in
which it is measured."

Perhaps we need to reconsider that our terrestrial physics isn't quite
sufficient, especially on behalf of interstellar expeditions.
..-Brad Guth