|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Problems with getting to Mars
"jacob navia" wrote in message ...
If you contaminate the planet you will never be sure which bacteria are earth bacteria and which are marsians unless they are radically different. Luckily, the overwhelming likelihood is that they will be radically different. Secondarily, Martian microbes will be suited to the extant Martian ecological niches whereas newly arrived Earth microbes will not be. Meaning that the population of indigenous Martian bugs should vastly exceed that of foreigners for a long time to come. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Problems with getting to Mars
"jacob navia" wrote in message ...
----- Original Message ----- From: "jjustwwondering" Newsgroups: sci.space.policy Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 1:24 AM Subject: Problems with getting to Mars "jacob navia" wrote in message news:c4gj2t$8f9$1@news- The discovery of a second data point will increase enormously our knowledge. Yes - this is a good reason to go out in force - probes, robots and researchers - to search for it, and if found, to research it. If you contaminate the planet you will never be sure which bacteria are earth bacteria and which are marsians unless they are radically different. This problem is much more difficult on Earth than on Mars, where long separate development (even assuming commnon origin) would guarantee the radical difference. Yet even on Earth, new life forms are successfully discovered and studied in isolated environments - from salt lakes to oil wells to rocks miles deep under the surface - all the time. There is the same contamination problem to deal with - only much worse than on Mars. Methods and techniques of handling this problem already exist. These methods somehow do not include what you suggested for Mars, namely "keeping sapient beings absent" from the whole planet! Besides, we must ensure that those bacteria (specially if similar to their earth counterparts) would not break havoc in OUR ecosystem! If they exist, some of them must be brought here occasionally via meteorites and space dust. Probably they all perish in the alien environment; in the unlikely case that any survive and proliferate, they must already be a part of our ecosystem... Before taking *any* probe from a foreign planet here we must KNOW that it is harmless. By the same logic, before obtaining and examining plague bacteria or ebola viruses, any lab would first make sure that they *are harmless*. Unfortunately, they aren't - and that is an extra reason to examine them. From any *terrestrial* environment that we study, unknown microscopic creatures may emerge to bug us or our crops. In this respect, Mars is, *in principle*, no different from rainforests or the ocean floor - *except* that any putative Martian life must be (1) far less abundant, and (2) vastly more alien, than either in rainforests or on the ocean floor. For both these reasons, the biological danger in studying Mars must be considered microscopic (pun accidental) compared to the biological danger in studying the Earth. Since we do the latter, we should also do the former. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Problems with getting to Mars
"G EddieA95" wrote ...
It's not the only possibility though - but given the 'God Fearing Nation' bit it's probably the only one that Bush would approve of other than celibacy / hypocrisy. If our country can't get a crew that can do without sexual pleasure for the duration of a Mars mission, then the Chinese *should* inherit the cosmos. That was there as an option in my post. I'd like to think that those planning manned Mars missions will be able to take a rather more objective look at the whole set of possibilities. The last thing an interplanetary flight needs is concerns about pregnancy or contraception, Nice job of snipping. Talking about which, a 'snip' would be one of the obvious options to avoid concerns about pregnancy. or other sexual issues. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Problems with getting to Mars
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:44:39 +0200, "jacob navia"
wrote: Yes, and that has to be tested, for several years in earth orbit. How do those tanks do in vacuum? .... That is why I think it will take like 30-40 years. We didn't need 30-40 years to land on the Moon -- we did it in eight. We don't need 30-40 years to get ready for a Mars mission. 20 more like it, and only because we're talking about doing a Moon base first. ..... 2050-2060 vintage technology will offer you such an environment. How do you know? Do you know what technologies will and won't be prevalant in the year 2050? No, you don't anymore than someone living in 1950 was right about what we'd have in 2000. Some came true, a lot did not, and by and large the world was tweaked. But a lot of work needs to be done first. I'll agree to that. That's why it is important to do research on the station and do a Moon base first. But I do not think it will tale 60 years unless we go out of our way to go at a snail's pace. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Problems with getting to Mars
"jacob navia" wrote in message ...
"Karl Hallowell" a écrit dans le message de om... snip So what is the real bee in your bonnet? That sounds like the really interesting thing here. We should try to preserve any life we find in space. Because of ethical reasons, and because of scientific reasons. Human exploration is risky because it could mean a contact with an alien form of life. Until we know for sure what is going on, we should always send machines first. Methane has been found some days ago. There are more and more hints of a small but existent ecology, probably completely underground, and with an alien biochemistry. As I suspected, this is more interesting. Frankly, I have no problems with careful exploration of possible life. There is an obvious conflict here with human habitation since Mars does look pretty good (IMHO of course) for humanity down the road. Even if life is discovered, human habitation will probably win. I don't know how risky (for us and for them) contact with extraterrestrial life will turn out to be. But Mars will be a good trial case. Karl Hallowell |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Japan admits its Mars probe is failing | JimO | Policy | 16 | December 6th 03 02:23 PM |
Delta-Like Fan On Mars Suggests Ancient Rivers Were Persistent | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 13th 03 09:06 PM |
If You Thought That Was a Close View of Mars, Just Wait (Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter) | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 23rd 03 10:25 PM |
NASA Selects UA 'Phoenix' Mission To Mars | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 4th 03 10:48 PM |
Students and Teachers to Explore Mars | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 18th 03 07:18 PM |