|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om... Who are you trying to convince? Nobody on this NG is stupid enough to fall for your "right back at ya" tactic. Again: do you have the slightest concern for your credibility? **** like this doesn't help you *at all* Hedrick is not WORTH a "real" answer. He's proven himself to have the mental and emotional age of about three, and I am insulting three-year-olds by saying so. LaDonna then if you don't think Hedrick is "reliable", then howsabout you post your verification for all the other "reliable" people on this ng who are still waiting for any validation *whatsoever* of *any* of your claims? If you're just refusing to reply because you've fixed on one (of many) people asking for your references and you have decided that they aren't "reliable", then you are just trying to wriggle off the hook. I think you'll find that this ng is full of very very patient, very very relentless fishermen. Again: where are your verifiable sources for all your claims? -- Terrell Miller "Married men live longer than single men, but married men are a lot more willing to die." Proverb |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... I am insulting What did Gus ever do to you? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Terrell Miller" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... Who are you trying to convince? Nobody on this NG is stupid enough to fall for your "right back at ya" tactic. Again: do you have the slightest concern for your credibility? **** like this doesn't help you *at all* Hedrick is not WORTH a "real" answer. He's proven himself to have the mental and emotional age of about three, and I am insulting three-year-olds by saying so. LaDonna then if you don't think Hedrick is "reliable", then howsabout you post your verification for all the other "reliable" people on this ng who are still waiting for any validation *whatsoever* of *any* of your claims? If you're just refusing to reply because you've fixed on one (of many) people asking for your references and you have decided that they aren't "reliable", then you are just trying to wriggle off the hook. I think you'll find that this ng is full of very very patient, very very relentless fishermen. Again: where are your verifiable sources for all your claims? Have you looked at what's already been posted? Have you "verified" those sources? If not, then what's the point of giving you more? Try doing what Daniel has been doing, and spend some time reviewing what I've given you so far. When you've done that, you'll be in a position to speak intelligently about what's already up, and to ask for more. Those who haven't reviewed the 150 pages that are already up are NOT going to be bothered to check anything else I say. LaDonna |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... Have you looked at what's already been posted? Yes. Have you "verified" those sources? Yes. They don't support your claims. spend some time reviewing what I've given you so far. I'm waiting to review the names and jurisdictions of the law enforcement personnel you contacted over Apollo 1. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message . ..
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... Have you looked at what's already been posted? Yes. Have you "verified" those sources? Yes. They don't support your claims. spend some time reviewing what I've given you so far. I'm waiting to review the names and jurisdictions of the law enforcement personnel you contacted over Apollo 1. Now I get to use the word: Liar. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... Now I get to use the word: Liar. Yes, you *should* be used to it. It's a clear description of you. I'll be more than happy to discuss what you've posted _after_ I can verify your claims about contacting law enforcement personnel about Apollo 1. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |