|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No More Free Soyuz Rides as of 2006
Was surprised I didn't see this pop up here (or maybe I missed it, but this
story is a shade old now): http://www.spacedaily.com/2005/04123....jzqrpfv5.html Okay, by my counts in the ISS program Cosmonauts have hitched rides on Shuttle flights ten times. Not all as members of ISS expeditions and on three of those flights, two Cosmonauts were aboard. Counting the launch of Expedition 1 on a Soyuz, Americans have ridden five Soyuz rockets to ISS. By 2006 at least one more expedition will be launched aboard Soyuz (at last check Expedition 11 was slated to go up on Soyuz). That would total six. With that in mind, I am curious as to NASA's reaction to this statement as American shuttles have, in addition to flying Cosmonauts up, also bore much of the burden of building ISS. I remember after the loss of Columbia, and the subsequent decision to try and retire the Shuttle by 2010, some suggested keeping the shuttle out of ISS crew rotation duties and leave that task to Soyuz to try and cut back on some shuttle flights. Was this decision by the RSA partially a final "hell no" to that idea? Was the initial agreement between the US and Russia that crew transfers would be an American responsiblity? Anyway, just throwing some thoughts out... -A.L. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"MasterShrink" wrote in message ... Was surprised I didn't see this pop up here (or maybe I missed it, but this story is a shade old now): http://www.spacedaily.com/2005/04123....jzqrpfv5.html snip Anyway, just throwing some thoughts out... The reality is that what people think about this "new development" doesn't much matter. The fact is that this "new development" stems from the original agreement between the US and Russia for ISS. The fact is that we're paying for our bad planning and execution. The original agreement was reached assuming that we'd have a US CRV operating by now. Due to budget overruns, the CRV was cut long ago. Essentially we signed an agreement that let us use Soyuz for a period of time. The Russians never agreed to let the US use Soyuz indefinitely. Funny how many in the US are whining about how good the Russians have become at introducing capitalism in their space program. It seems odd for a country that used to believe that capitalism was superior to communism. Jeff -- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Soyuz TMA-4 update, 24-10-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 25th 04 02:41 PM |
Soyuz TMA-5 prelaunch processing | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | September 23rd 04 10:07 PM |
Decision on the Soyuz TMA-4 spacecraft prelaunch processing | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | April 1st 04 01:12 PM |
Soyuz TMA-2 update, 28-10-2003 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 29th 03 06:31 PM |
Tethered free flying wings | Pete Lynn | Policy | 6 | August 9th 03 09:16 AM |