A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAT RATS HAVE ALREADY LEFT THE SINKING SHIP



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 19th 08, 11:49 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,041
Default FAT RATS HAVE ALREADY LEFT THE SINKING SHIP

On May 8, 7:30*am, Pentcho Valev wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
On May 3, 5:07*pm,PentchoValev wrote:

On Apr 25, 7:41*pm,PentchoValev wrote:


Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:


http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist Joćo Magueijo *asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) - is known as the
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo - who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London - says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."


http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538
Paul Davies, 2003: "The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is
one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is
it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the
speed of light might not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this
mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"


Einstein zombie world, 2003-2008, while the next Great Revolution in
Science is still around the corner:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ


http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/E.../Einsteine.jpg


http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm


http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/i...e_einstein.mp3


http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=rHDjSD...eature=related


The idiotic atmosphere in Einstein zombie world allows Einsteinians
not only to safely leave the sinking ship but also to make career and
even fight against one another by refuting Einstein's 1905 falselight
postulate:

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/smol...n03_print.html
Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the
effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of
the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory
that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the
same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the
sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself
based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy
of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized
Einstein's general theory of relativity.....But there is another
possibility. This is that the principle of relativity is preserved,
but Einstein's special theory of relativity requires modification so
as to allow photons to have a speed that depends on energy. The most
shocking thing I have learned in the last year is that this is a real
possibility. A photon can have an energy-dependent speed without
violating the principle of relativity!"

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1...ingtheory.html
Lee Smolin: "So I've said, look, if the speed of light isn't
universal, that disconfirms string theory. But the string theorists
say they could probably invent versions of the theory that work either
way. We'd have to change our notion of what science is to accommodate
this proposition. You just can't do science on that basis."


"The next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner",
Einstein's 1905 false light postulate is a nightmare now, fat rat are
leaving the sinking ship in panic, even Einstein zombie world is not
singing "Divine Einstein" so fiercely:

http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems...ence&Topic=166
"DOES Einstein need to be corrected? More specifically, does his
theory of relativity need correction? This might well be the case if
the recently launched telescope GLAST comes up with any new
information regarding the speed of light.....It has been observed that
both low energy and high-energy Gamma rays are emitted and they travel
at different speeds. Such phenomenon is an impossibility in terms of
the theory of relativity. Such differences in speeds are expected to
be picked up by the GLAST. Earth-based observatories have already
suggested that this indeed is happening."

Pentcho Valev

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RATS! This group looks like alt.usenet.kooks Hagar Misc 0 September 18th 06 04:06 PM
RATS! This group looks like alt.usenet.kooks honestjohn Misc 0 September 18th 06 03:58 PM
Rats -- As we approach the New Moon chances for auroras this weekendremains low Sam Wormley Amateur Astronomy 1 August 14th 04 05:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2021 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.