A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another post on the HST



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 04, 11:39 PM
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Another post on the HST

What minimum service is required to keep HST up and running for another 5
years? In know there are other packages that were hoped to be spliced
on...

Since the ISS is now a "way station", perhaps it could be turned into a
filling station complete with a tow truck. Could an extra Soyuz be
outfitted with the necessary acoutrements to install new Evereadys in HST,
until such time as a new leavy lift platform is operational? Spacewalk
capability comes along with the Soyuz, but does it have, or could it be
delivered onsite with enough fuel to get to HST and either reenter with its
crew, or redock with the ISS.

No real reason a mantenance staff *needs* the kitchen sink along, is there?

David A. Smith


  #2  
Old February 27th 04, 04:09 AM
Chosp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Another post on the HST


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
message news:ltv%b.1533$h23.1152@fed1read06...
What minimum service is required to keep HST up and running for another 5
years? In know there are other packages that were hoped to be spliced
on...

Since the ISS is now a "way station", perhaps it could be turned into a
filling station complete with a tow truck. Could an extra Soyuz be
outfitted with the necessary acoutrements to install new Evereadys in HST,
until such time as a new leavy lift platform is operational?


Unfortunately, no. There is no realistic means to get a manned Soyuz
spacecraft to Hubble's altitude and inclination. Robots of sufficient
complexity and dexterity to accomplish the range of specific tasks
necessary to change out the gyros and batteries simply do not exist
nor is there anything equivalent even on the drawing boards.
There are no extra Soyuz spacecraft available. There is no new
heavy lift platform on the horizon. That about covers it.
Unfortunately, if the Shuttle doesn't do it, it won't get done.

Spacewalk
capability comes along with the Soyuz, but does it have, or could it be
delivered onsite with enough fuel to get to HST and either reenter with

its
crew, or redock with the ISS.


No. The fuel requirements are beyond anything available. Not to and from
the ISS. Nor from existing or planned manned Soyuz launch sites
on the ground.

No real reason a mantenance staff *needs* the kitchen sink along, is

there?

Actually, yes (depending on what you mean by the kitchen sink.)





  #3  
Old February 27th 04, 02:20 PM
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Another post on the HST

Dear Chosp:

"Chosp" wrote in message
news:MJB%b.4805$id3.3694@fed1read01...

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
message news:ltv%b.1533$h23.1152@fed1read06...
What minimum service is required to keep HST up and running for another

5
years? In know there are other packages that were hoped to be spliced
on...

Since the ISS is now a "way station", perhaps it could be turned into a
filling station complete with a tow truck. Could an extra Soyuz be
outfitted with the necessary acoutrements to install new Evereadys in

HST,
until such time as a new leavy lift platform is operational?


Unfortunately, no. There is no realistic means to get a manned Soyuz
spacecraft to Hubble's altitude and inclination. Robots of sufficient
complexity and dexterity to accomplish the range of specific tasks
necessary to change out the gyros and batteries simply do not exist
nor is there anything equivalent even on the drawing boards.
There are no extra Soyuz spacecraft available. There is no new
heavy lift platform on the horizon. That about covers it.
Unfortunately, if the Shuttle doesn't do it, it won't get done.

Spacewalk
capability comes along with the Soyuz, but does it have, or could it be
delivered onsite with enough fuel to get to HST and either reenter with

its
crew, or redock with the ISS.


No. The fuel requirements are beyond anything available. Not to and from
the ISS. Nor from existing or planned manned Soyuz launch sites
on the ground.


I was imagining an extra empty Soyuz delivered to the ISS, with perhaps a
"booster" delivered in the Space Shuttle cargo bay. Soyuz+booster married
together might make it. Of course engineering up such a cludge prior to
the loss of the HST would be no mean feat.

No real reason a mantenance staff *needs* the kitchen sink along, is

there?

Actually, yes (depending on what you mean by the kitchen sink.)


The Shuttle. And I am answered.

David A. Smith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VIRUS WARNING Stuf 4 post on comet! Pat Flannery History 13 November 23rd 03 01:30 AM
VIRUS WARNING! Stuf 4 post on comet! Pat Flannery History 0 November 18th 03 01:32 PM
Wash Post shuttle story six weeks behind NBC coverage James Oberg Space Shuttle 6 August 29th 03 10:27 PM
antagonist's digest, volume 2452854 dizzy Astronomy Misc 4 August 7th 03 01:02 AM
Test post Doug... History 8 July 22nd 03 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.