|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Discussion on this present situation
It is possible to rearrange observations to suit the grouping of
rotations which stretch from Mar 1st 2008 until Feb 29th 2012 into the convenience as we know it so that we never lose sight of the cause and effect which distinguishes us as reasoning human beings,that one 24 hour rotation will always remain fixed to a day/night cycle.It is unconscionable that this correspondence is challenged within the calendar system never mind embarrassing in the extreme yet unfortunately that is the present situation as followers of Newton's strain of empiricism assign 366 1/ rotations for an orbital circuit that cannot contain any more than a full 365 rotations,what would merely be disconcerting turns into a crisis by virtue of the lack of response in this and other online communities. It is not possible to appeal to any or one specific group and although there have been nothing but reactions so far,most by nuisances and of a personal nature that goes in one ear and out the other,reactions are personal complaints and complaints do not substitute for authority.I well understand that people are not defending Newton as much as they are protecting their jobs but on this point alone,the loss of the basic correspondence between a 24 hour day and a day/night cycle is a special case,if people wish to believe me wrong,insane or any other cheap shot then they are welcome,the only fact that matters is that the correspondence between the proportion of full rotations to orbital circuits is near enough 1461 rotations to 4 orbital circuits or 365 1/4 rotations to 1 orbital circuit. There are no 366 1/ rotations per orbital circuit and it is foolish to believe that there is even though it is proposed as a fact by NASA,this is wrong and,even if it represents a fractured umbrella organization,the idea that the premier space organization in the world acquiesces to something as shockingly bad as late 17th century reasoning undermines everything it does,On the other hand,the appreciation of the grouping of 1461 rotations in blocks of 365 and 366 rotations that make up the calendar system is mostly an individual thing and that is what is most dismaying,it is not a weakness although some might perceive it that way however indignation that an entire community has hatred for astronomy that much that it can't put the calendar system in context of the daily and annual cycles of the Earth. We should be discussing many,many things but not this,not the objection to what the Feb 29th rotation and day/night cycle does in relation to the 4 orbital circuits and the preceding 1460 rotations which comprise of the proportional correspondence between daily and orbital motions.This is not a science issue in itself,this is so much more in every facet of human existence because if we can't accept this fact as decisive then our children will pay the price for the loss of that great human trait which divides wisdom from speculative fiction. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION | physicsajay | SETI | 1 | November 5th 06 12:49 PM |
Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION | physicsajay | Policy | 0 | October 24th 06 10:42 AM |
Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION | AJAY SHARMA | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 24th 06 10:34 AM |
Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION | AJAY SHARMA | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 06 10:33 AM |
Past, present and future of E=mc2: A CRITICAL DISCUSSION | AJAY SHARMA | Misc | 0 | October 24th 06 10:28 AM |