A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BH with Orbiting White dwarf



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th 18, 06:29 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert
  #2  
Old November 28th 18, 08:42 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert


Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert
  #3  
Old November 29th 18, 12:36 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Mark Earnest[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,124
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert


Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert



To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.

  #4  
Old November 29th 18, 03:12 AM posted to alt.astronomy
palsing[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,068
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert


Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert



To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.


By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off".
  #5  
Old November 29th 18, 02:22 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Mark Earnest[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,124
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert

Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert



To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.


By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off".


White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black

holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant

phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits.

You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the

books long enough to use a little imagination.

  #6  
Old November 29th 18, 11:42 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert

Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert


To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.


By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off".


White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black

holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant

phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits.

You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the

books long enough to use a little imagination.


Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert
  #7  
Old November 30th 18, 12:07 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 2:42:20 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie..Bert

Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert


To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.

By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off".


White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black

holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant

phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits.

You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the

books long enough to use a little imagination.


Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert



Which would leave any civilizations there plenty of time to figure out how to move to a better location!

Double-A

  #8  
Old November 30th 18, 12:48 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Mark Earnest[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,124
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 4:42:20 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie..Bert

Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert


To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.

By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off".


White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black

holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant

phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits.

You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the

books long enough to use a little imagination.


Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert


Maybe add a little salt and pepper to what you say, Bert. Then we may

understand.

  #9  
Old November 30th 18, 12:51 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Mark Earnest[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,124
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:07:17 PM UTC-6, Double-A wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 2:42:20 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert

Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert


To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.

By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off".

White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black

holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant

phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits.

You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the

books long enough to use a little imagination.


Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert



Which would leave any civilizations there plenty of time to figure out how to move to a better location!


It is easy to build space ships. We seem to be the only ones having difficulty

with this.
  #10  
Old December 1st 18, 11:54 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default BH with Orbiting White dwarf

On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 3:51:36 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:07:17 PM UTC-6, Double-A wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 2:42:20 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 5:22:30 AM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 8:13:00 PM UTC-6, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 3:36:52 PM UTC-8, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-6, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 9:29:44 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
I think BH is three times more dense. Still their relative time must be a year to a second with Earth's time.I trying to think of a time that goes back into past time.Back to the future can only be done in a movie.Bert

Three White dwarfs in close orbit equal one BH.This was reality 18 billion LYs ago.Density was in the further back in time.Matter is losing thinning out as I type Bert


To make a black hole the three white dwarves have to die first. And you will have to get everyone off of the orbiting planets.

By their very definition, white dwarves are already dead. No fusion takes place in a white dwarf where mass is converted to energy. They only shine because of stored-up thermal energy. Any planets orbiting a white dwarf are also long dead, having been stripped of their atmospheres, there would not be anyone there to "get off".

White dwarves may be dead but they are not dead enough to become black

holes. And it is possible that civilizations survived a star's red giant

phase. When a star increases diameter so do the planets' orbits.

You could figure all this out for yourself if you got your head out of the

books long enough to use a little imagination.

Reality is it can take 2 trillion years for a white hole to go black WOW.Bert



Which would leave any civilizations there plenty of time to figure out how to move to a better location!


It is easy to build space ships. We seem to be the only ones having difficulty

with this.


No need to build space ships when we can convert comets.Bert
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How long does it take a white dwarf to be a brown dwarf? G=EMC^2[_2_] Misc 41 January 11th 13 08:24 PM
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes, confirmed Yousuf Khan[_2_] Astronomy Misc 26 March 22nd 10 04:54 AM
After the sun becomes a white dwarf, how long will it take to become a black dwarf? Radium[_2_] Research 3 July 16th 07 10:53 PM
White dwarf and ultra-cool dwarf keep their distance (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 April 24th 07 09:45 PM
White dwarf and ultra-cool dwarf keep their distance (Forwarded) Andrew Yee[_1_] News 0 April 24th 07 08:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.