A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Laws of Physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 28th 10, 01:23 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Visual Purple
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Laws of Physics

Laws of Physics

This article: Is the Universe Leaking Energy?
Total energy must be conserved. Every student of physics learns this
fundamental law. The trouble is, it does not apply to the universe as
a whole
By Tamara M. Davis
http://tinyurl.com/3xr6u64

was the afflatus for this response.

There goes the Universe not behaving itself in accordance with our
Laws again! This is getting irksome and needs to be nipped in the bud.

Perhaps greater control over the Universe would be exerted if there
were, in addition to the body of Common Physical Laws, Admiralty
Physical Laws (for when travelling in space), you know, like a UCC for
when surfing the EM waves and an ever-growing, more constrictive,
restrictive, suppressive body of statutes.

Perhaps we can enter into contractual arrangements with the Bosons so
that they clearly understand the parameters of what they can and
cannot do, can and cannot be.

I think we've been a bit too liberal in the application of laws to the
Universe. It's getting too big for its britches and uppity and
sometimes acts unpredictably. We have to put tighter controls on that
or things could get out of hand.

Physicists might have to bite the proverbial bullet and call in the
cretins from Mensa who framed, reframed, cut and edited their
Constitution till it fit like an Iron Maiden.

I know. I know. It's nasty to have to hobnob with the hoi polloi.

Perhaps, if the sub-atomic particles (call them subs repeatedly to
whittle away at their sense of sovereignty) get too uppity, we should
issue all of them a card with their names on it in CAPS and a serial
number, which is listed with the stock exchange. We'll tell them we
are doing this so that they can reap retirement benefits when they get
old. This is a very clever trick as it will dehumanize them without
them knowing it - until we are ready for them to know they've been
dehumanized. HA! If they ever demand their rights to existence we'll
let them know that they are nothing but commodities listed on the
stock exchange through the Indy media. That way they'll have the
illusion that they've discovered a great secret truth, which is, that
they are really slaves - which they weren't until they began to think
they are because they discovered our little deception, which they
thought was truth. Oh, how fiendishly clever we are!

The name in CAPS on their SS cards is not their real identity, of
course. It's sort of a straw wavicle that we've set up in their stead
which is really a fictitious corporation that we invented so that
they'll give up their sovereignty and become corporate bodies, so we
can sue them. That' always slows them down! This switch of identities
can only be done at sea level and meshes nicely with the body of
Admiralty Physical Laws which we've invented to limit their commercial
interactions. They'll think their name is NEUTRINO, when it's really
Neutrino. Most of them will never notice the difference or, the
brighter ones who do, will think that their names are in CAPS because
we consider them important. That way we can fool them into signing all
sorts of contracts and admitting to things and get them otherwise all
entangled in Courts of Physical Laws in which the judges aren't
judges, just magistrates. And they'll have a complex for life thinking
their own mothers turned them into slaves by reporting their berth, I
mean birth, to the authorities who issued their berth certificate
number and turned them into unknowing slaves. That will leave them
emotionally crippled for life and so their potential energy will be
greatly diminished, the better to make them docile and malleable (or
is it ductile?). You follow? Dastardly brilliant. N'est-ce pas?

If, on the off chance, anyone is not familiar with the references in
my parody, please see this link for an introduction:

http://www.freedomclubusa.com/ucc_strawman

I like the above link best, because it doesn't involve any ideological
agenda. It just explains the matter.

Blacks Law Dictionary:

"For more than a century Black’s Law Dictionary has been the gold
standard for the language of law. Today, it is the most widely cited
law book in the world."

http://www.lawbooks.com/products/_50139.html

The following articles also have important excerpts from legal
dictionaries. Just filter out the ideological bent if it doesn't suit
you:

http://ecclesia.org/forum/uploads/bo...nt/personP.pdf

http://www.creationscienceseminars.o...ng_handout.pdf

The point is: The economic elite, who see you in terms of how you are
defined according to the systems of law that the elite of yore
devised, are those to whom scientists grovel for funding.

Do not play tricks with your conscience. Yes, the opportunistic and
demeaning concept of 'human being' and 'person', and considering us as
vassals for all legal intents and purposes *do* impinge on science and
on what are accepted as "the Physical Laws" - and what scientific
results are expected.

If we wish to do real science, and math for that matter (the concept
of discrete point is profoundly political); we will have to clear away
the existing socio-economic and political morass that does not allow
for genuine intellectual endeavor. In order to do real science, we
must, first of all, create the conditions that allow for what Russell
Lord described as: "the gift of a fresh eye and an untrammeled
curiosity."

In his essay, written in 1896 entitled "Anarchism : Its Philosophy and
Ideal", Piotr Kropotkin, a world renowned geographer and geologist
wrote:


"What used to be called "natural law" is nothing but a certain
relation among phenomena which we dimly see, and each "law" takes a
temporary character of causality; that is to say: If such a phenomenon
is produced under such conditions, such another phenomenon will
follow. No law placed outside the phenomena: each phenomenon governs
that which follows it - not law...

Harmony thus appears as a temporary adjustment established among all
forces acting upon a given spot - a provisory adaptation. And that
adjustment will only last under one condition: that of being
continually modified; of representing every moment the resultant of
all conflicting actions. Let but one of those forces be hampered in
its action for some time and harmony disappears...

In fact it is certain that in proportion as the human mind frees
itself from ideas inculcated by minorities of priests, military chiefs
and judges, all striving to establish their domination, and of
scientists paid to perpetuate it, a conception of society arises in
which there is no longer room for those dominating minorities.

http://www.panarchy.org/kropotkin/1896.eng.html

It is frightening to see that there has been a regression in the
openness of scientists from the time that Kropotkin wrote that essay
until today. They are not more rigorous in their method. They are
merely more timid about what they allow themselves to serve as
findings.

The political-social-economic expressions of Anarchism are only an
infinitesimal subset of ONTOLOGICAL ANARCHISM. The Universe is NOT
RULED BY LAWS. It is dynamic harmonies of cooperation and integration.
Those integrations are ephemeral. Live with it. They will remain
ephemeral whether you feel comfortable with that or not.

The obsessive-compulsive need to control humans that led to codes of
law and statutes, regulations and contractual agreements that aren't
agreements at all but imposition of the will of the brutal on the less
brutal is the same provenance that drives the equally obsessive-
compulsive imposition of wholly artificial and imaginary laws on the
universe.


Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

  #2  
Old June 28th 10, 01:32 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Laws of Physics

On Jun 27, 5:23*pm, Visual Purple wrote:
Laws of Physics

This article: *Is the Universe Leaking Energy?
Total energy must be conserved. Every student of physics learns this
fundamental law. The trouble is, it does not apply to the universe as
a whole
By Tamara M. Davishttp://tinyurl.com/3xr6u64

was the afflatus for this response.

There goes the Universe not behaving itself in accordance with our
Laws again! This is getting irksome and needs to be nipped in the bud.

Perhaps greater control over the Universe would be exerted if there
were, in addition to the body of Common Physical Laws, Admiralty
Physical Laws (for when travelling in space), you know, like a UCC for
when surfing the EM waves and an ever-growing, more constrictive,
restrictive, suppressive body of statutes.

Perhaps we can enter into contractual arrangements with the Bosons so
that they clearly understand the parameters of what they can and
cannot do, can and cannot be.

I think we've been a bit too liberal in the application of laws to the
Universe. It's getting too big for its britches and uppity and
sometimes acts unpredictably. We have to put tighter controls on that
or things could get out of hand.

Physicists might have to bite the proverbial bullet and call in the
cretins from Mensa who framed, reframed, cut and edited their
Constitution till it fit like an Iron Maiden.

I know. I know. It's nasty to have to hobnob with the hoi polloi.

Perhaps, if the sub-atomic particles (call them subs repeatedly to
whittle away at their sense of sovereignty) get too uppity, we should
issue all of them a card with their names on it in CAPS and a serial
number, which is listed with the stock exchange. *We'll tell them we
are doing this so that they can reap retirement benefits when they get
old. This is a very clever trick as it will dehumanize them without
them knowing it - until we are ready for them to know they've been
dehumanized. HA! If they ever demand their rights to existence we'll
let them know that they are nothing but commodities listed on the
stock exchange through the Indy media. That way they'll have the
illusion that they've discovered a great secret truth, which is, that
they are really slaves - which they weren't until they began to think
they are because they discovered our little deception, which they
thought was truth. Oh, how fiendishly clever we are!

The name in CAPS on their SS cards is not their real identity, of
course. It's sort of a straw wavicle that we've set up in their stead
which is really a fictitious corporation that we invented so that
they'll give up their sovereignty and become corporate bodies, so we
can sue them. That' always slows them down! This switch of identities
can only be done at sea level and meshes nicely with the body of
Admiralty Physical Laws which we've invented to limit their commercial
interactions. They'll think their name is NEUTRINO, when it's really
Neutrino. Most of them will never notice the difference or, the
brighter ones who do, will *think that their names are in CAPS because
we consider them important. That way we can fool them into signing all
sorts of contracts and admitting to things and get them otherwise all
entangled in Courts of Physical Laws in which the judges aren't
judges, just magistrates. And they'll have a complex for life thinking
their own mothers turned them into slaves by reporting their berth, I
mean birth, to the authorities who issued their berth certificate
number and turned them into unknowing slaves. That will leave them
emotionally crippled for life and so their potential energy will be
greatly diminished, the better to make them docile and malleable (or
is it ductile?). You follow? Dastardly brilliant. N'est-ce pas?

If, on the off chance, anyone is not familiar with the references in
my parody, please see this link for an introduction:

http://www.freedomclubusa.com/ucc_strawman

I like the above link best, because it doesn't involve any ideological
agenda. It just explains the matter.

Blacks Law Dictionary:

"For more than a century Black’s Law Dictionary has been the gold
standard for the language of law. Today, it is the most widely cited
law book in the world."

http://www.lawbooks.com/products/_50139.html

The following articles also have important excerpts from legal
dictionaries. Just filter out the ideological bent if it doesn't suit
you:

http://ecclesia.org/forum/uploads/bo...nt/personP.pdf

http://www.creationscienceseminars.o...ng_handout.pdf

The point is: The economic elite, who see you in terms of how you are
defined according to the systems of law that the elite of yore
devised, are those to whom scientists grovel for funding.

Do not play tricks with your conscience. Yes, the opportunistic and
demeaning concept of 'human being' and 'person', and considering us as
vassals for all legal intents and purposes *do* impinge on science and
on what are accepted as "the Physical Laws" - and what scientific
results are expected.

If we wish to do real science, and math for that matter (the concept
of discrete point is profoundly political); we will have to clear away
the existing socio-economic and political morass that does not allow
for genuine intellectual endeavor. In order to do real science, we
must, first of all, create the conditions that allow for what Russell
Lord described as: *"the gift of a fresh eye and an untrammeled
curiosity."

In his essay, written in 1896 entitled "Anarchism : Its Philosophy and
Ideal", Piotr Kropotkin, a world renowned geographer and geologist
wrote:

"What used to be called "natural law" is nothing but a certain
relation among phenomena which we dimly see, and each "law" takes a
temporary character of causality; that is to say: If such a phenomenon
is produced under such conditions, such another phenomenon will
follow. No law placed outside the phenomena: each phenomenon governs
that which follows it - not law...

Harmony thus appears as a temporary adjustment established among all
forces acting upon a given spot - a provisory adaptation. And that
adjustment will only last under one condition: that of being
continually modified; of representing every moment the resultant of
all conflicting actions. Let but one of those forces be hampered in
its action for some time and harmony disappears...

In fact it is certain that in proportion as the human mind frees
itself from ideas inculcated by minorities of priests, military chiefs
and judges, all striving to establish their domination, and of
scientists paid to perpetuate it, a conception of society arises in
which there is no longer room for those dominating minorities.

http://www.panarchy.org/kropotkin/1896.eng.html

It is frightening to see that there has been a regression in the
openness of scientists from the time that Kropotkin wrote that essay
until today. They are not more rigorous in their method. They are
merely more timid about what they allow themselves to serve as
findings.

*The political-social-economic expressions of Anarchism are only an
infinitesimal subset of ONTOLOGICAL ANARCHISM. The Universe is NOT
RULED BY LAWS. It is dynamic harmonies of cooperation and integration.
Those integrations are ephemeral. Live with it. They will remain
ephemeral whether you feel comfortable with that or not.

The obsessive-compulsive need to control humans that led to codes of
law and statutes, regulations and contractual agreements that aren't
agreements at all but imposition of the will of the brutal on the less
brutal is the same provenance that drives the equally obsessive-
compulsive imposition of wholly artificial and imaginary laws on the
universe.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel


You notice and bring to our attention the lack of open minded science,
and their unwillingness to revise anything.

Do you think this is not a full blown conspiracy, but instead pure
random happenstance of independent groups merely acting as an
intellectual cartel/cabal?

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Example of conversation on Physics laws. oldcoot[_2_] Misc 1 February 18th 09 06:47 PM
Cost of launch and laws of physics Greg Kuperberg Policy 235 August 30th 03 10:20 PM
Solar sailing DOESN"T break laws of physics' Geoffrey A. Landis Policy 70 July 13th 03 01:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.