#1
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
As a newcomer to the hobby I have recently purchased a celstron 114GT.
It arrived with 2 eye pieces 10mm and 25mm. Iam thinking of buying a 4mm would this be alright for this 4.5" telescope? Many Thanks, John. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
"John Morris" wrote in message
... As a newcomer to the hobby I have recently purchased a celstron 114GT. It arrived with 2 eye pieces 10mm and 25mm. Iam thinking of buying a 4mm would this be alright for this 4.5" telescope? Many Thanks, John. No. Too much power. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
"John Morris" wrote in message
... As a newcomer to the hobby I have recently purchased a celstron 114GT. It arrived with 2 eye pieces 10mm and 25mm. Iam thinking of buying a 4mm would this be alright for this 4.5" telescope? Many Thanks, John. No. Too much power. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
As a newcomer to the hobby I have recently purchased a celstron 114GT. It arrived with 2 eye pieces 10mm and 25mm. I am thinking of buying a 4mm would this be alright for this 4.5" telescope?
It seems, the following set of eyepieces is optimal for your scope: 6.3 mm, 10 mm, 16 mm, 27 mm, 43 mm. You have 10 and 25, so at first it is better for you to get 6.3 and 40-42, then something like 16-17 to collect full set. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
As a newcomer to the hobby I have recently purchased a celstron 114GT. It arrived with 2 eye pieces 10mm and 25mm. I am thinking of buying a 4mm would this be alright for this 4.5" telescope?
It seems, the following set of eyepieces is optimal for your scope: 6.3 mm, 10 mm, 16 mm, 27 mm, 43 mm. You have 10 and 25, so at first it is better for you to get 6.3 and 40-42, then something like 16-17 to collect full set. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
It seems, the following set of eyepieces is optimal for your scope:
6.3 mm, 10 mm, 16 mm, 27 mm, 43 mm. You have 10 and 25, so at first it is better for you to get 6.3 and 40-42, then something like 16-17 to collect full set. Exactly why are these optimal? Since the Nextstar 114 GT has a 1.25 inch focuser, 40-42 mm will have the same True Field of View as 32mm, for the vast majority of situations, the 32 will provide better views than the 40-42mm eyepiece. Also a 32mm doubles with a barlow to a 16 which is a nice. jon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
It seems, the following set of eyepieces is optimal for your scope:
6.3 mm, 10 mm, 16 mm, 27 mm, 43 mm. You have 10 and 25, so at first it is better for you to get 6.3 and 40-42, then something like 16-17 to collect full set. Exactly why are these optimal? Since the Nextstar 114 GT has a 1.25 inch focuser, 40-42 mm will have the same True Field of View as 32mm, for the vast majority of situations, the 32 will provide better views than the 40-42mm eyepiece. Also a 32mm doubles with a barlow to a 16 which is a nice. jon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
Ernest wrote: As a newcomer to the hobby I have recently purchased a celstron 114GT. It arrived with 2 eye pieces 10mm and 25mm. I am thinking of buying a 4mm would this be alright for this 4.5" telescope? It seems, the following set of eyepieces is optimal for your scope: 6.3 mm, 10 mm, 16 mm, 27 mm, 43 mm. You have 10 and 25, so at first it is better for you to get 6.3 and 40-42, then something like 16-17 to collect full set. For a beginner (like I am) with a new 114GT, I'd suggest the Celestron eyepiece kit. For about $100 to $130 (I paid $104), you get five Plossl eyepieces, a 2X Barlow, an aluminum clad and foam filled case, and seven filters to play with. The 32 mm eyepiece in my kit is excellent, as are the 15 and 9. The 4 mm eyepiece in the kit is not really usable with a 114GT (it's intended for wide field scopes like the NexStar 80). I use the 6 mm only rarely. Of the two eyepieces (SMAs IIRC) that come with the 114GT, my 25mm is OK, but the 10 isn't too hot. I've found the Barlow in the kit to be OK for my purposes, but others in the NexStar group (on Yahoo Groups) say there are better quality ones out there. I've used the Moon filter more than any others, but YMMV. Supposedly the Meade eyepiece kit marketed a few months ago has better quality Plossl eyepieces than the Celestron one, but I have no experience with them. -- Pat O'Connell [note munged EMail address] Take nothing but pictures, Leave nothing but footprints, Kill nothing but vandals... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
Ernest wrote: As a newcomer to the hobby I have recently purchased a celstron 114GT. It arrived with 2 eye pieces 10mm and 25mm. I am thinking of buying a 4mm would this be alright for this 4.5" telescope? It seems, the following set of eyepieces is optimal for your scope: 6.3 mm, 10 mm, 16 mm, 27 mm, 43 mm. You have 10 and 25, so at first it is better for you to get 6.3 and 40-42, then something like 16-17 to collect full set. For a beginner (like I am) with a new 114GT, I'd suggest the Celestron eyepiece kit. For about $100 to $130 (I paid $104), you get five Plossl eyepieces, a 2X Barlow, an aluminum clad and foam filled case, and seven filters to play with. The 32 mm eyepiece in my kit is excellent, as are the 15 and 9. The 4 mm eyepiece in the kit is not really usable with a 114GT (it's intended for wide field scopes like the NexStar 80). I use the 6 mm only rarely. Of the two eyepieces (SMAs IIRC) that come with the 114GT, my 25mm is OK, but the 10 isn't too hot. I've found the Barlow in the kit to be OK for my purposes, but others in the NexStar group (on Yahoo Groups) say there are better quality ones out there. I've used the Moon filter more than any others, but YMMV. Supposedly the Meade eyepiece kit marketed a few months ago has better quality Plossl eyepieces than the Celestron one, but I have no experience with them. -- Pat O'Connell [note munged EMail address] Take nothing but pictures, Leave nothing but footprints, Kill nothing but vandals... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Eye Pieces.
For a beginner (like I am) with a new 114GT, I'd suggest the Celestron
eyepiece kit. For about $100 to $130 (I paid $104), you get five Plossl eyepieces, a 2X Barlow, an aluminum clad and foam filled case, and seven filters to play with. Good idea. jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two up, two down (in pieces). | Derek Lyons | Policy | 0 | August 9th 04 08:13 PM |
OT - It Takes Two To Tango | Alan Erskine | Space Shuttle | 3 | September 15th 03 05:53 AM |
The bomb fairy. | Ian Stirling | Technology | 3 | August 21st 03 03:41 PM |
51-L Surface Search (Forward Fuselage Recovery) | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 19th 03 08:43 PM |