#11
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
It seems that 21st century empiricism is much like the behavior of the
Jesuits in the early 17th century,it didn't matter whether the technical arguments were sound,it only mattered that Galileo had challenged their reputations to such an extent that his fate was sealed - "From this and other circumstances from which it would take too long to repeat here it will be seen that the fury of my powerful persecutors continually increases. The have at length chosen to reveal themselves to me; for about two months ago, when a dear friends of mine at Rome was speaking of my affairs to Father Christopher Griemberger, mathematician at the college there, this Jesuit uttered the following precise words;—‘If Galileo had only known how to retain the favor of the fathers of this college, he would have stood in renown before the world, he would have been spared all his misfortunes, and could have written what he pleased about everything, even about the motion of the earth.’ From this you will see, honoured Sir, that it is not this opinion or that which has brought, and still brings about my calamities, but my being in disgrace with the Jesuits." Galileo Under normal circumstances the transition to a more productive regime would involve a considerable effort however with a struggle to retain reputations that no longer exist,it is difficult to see where the people are going to come from who wish to secure genuine reputations and expertise.Silence is a mere concession to a lost reputation even while retaining a lifestyle but it is much better to acquire understanding of the core questions that have to be dealt with and deal with them regardless of the cost. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
On Feb 22, 11:40*am, oriel36 wrote:
it is difficult to see where the people are going to come from who wish to secure genuine reputations and expertise. Today, of course, unlike Galileo, you need have no fear of the Inquisition. The people who post here do not give your ideas a sympathetic ear because they feel that they know you are wrong. To find a more sympathetic audience, you will need to turn elsewhere. I am sure there are people out there who would find merit in your ideas, even though I feel they, as well as you, would be mistaken. Many people have a world view strongly shaped by religion, and have little sympathy for, or knowledge of, modern science and mathematics - and, so, they would at least be able to consider your ideas with an open mind, for what that is worth. John Savard |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
Having spent 3 weeks in hospital with a fractured spine plus
complications,I marvel at the integrity of the doctors and staff as I am on the road to recovery - there is no duplicity,no scam as these people go about their business and then I come across this human tragedy where people act in the worst possible manner. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_rotation The article is an act of insanity,it goes against all the principles which give people a sense of stability and integrity and most of all,it loses all sense of cause and effect so mathematicians can have the clockwork solar system and modeling as a point of departure for more duplicity and pretense. The issue has never been one of denunciation but rather the revisiting of a valid question that was never settled and remains before everyone - it does require a slight effort to distinguish between the predictive convenience of a rotating celestial sphere set within the calendar/clockwork system as opposed to the interpretative astronomy which is quite separate and uses a different set of principles based on 365 1/4 days and rotations for one annual circuit. The 21st century should not have to support articles like Wikipedia and rotation as the Earth does not turn to the Sun once in 24 hours and a star returns 3 minutes 56 seconds earlier each 24 hour AM/PM cycle within the 365/366 day format making it obviously worthless for proving constant daily rotation. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
"oriel36" wrote in message
... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_rotation The article is an act of insanity,it goes against all the principles which give people a sense of stability and integrity and most of all,it loses all sense of cause and effect so mathematicians can have the clockwork solar system and modeling as a point of departure for more duplicity and pretense. ================================================== = Thus the anonymous thug "oriel36" displays his own insanity. -- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway. When the fools chicken farmer Wilson and Van de faggot present an argument I cannot laugh at I'll retire from usenet. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
On Friday, February 22, 2013 2:19:21 PM UTC-8, oriel36 wrote:
... and then I come across this human tragedy where people act in the worst possible manner. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_rotation The article is an act of insanity,it goes against all the principles which give people a sense of stability and integrity and most of all,it loses all sense of cause and effect so mathematicians can have the clockwork solar system and modeling as a point of departure for more duplicity and pretense. The solution is clear to me. You need to stop reading immediately! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
On Feb 23, 1:48*am, palsing wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 2:19:21 PM UTC-8, oriel36 wrote: ... and then I come across this human tragedy where people act in the worst possible manner. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_rotation The article is an act of insanity,it goes against all the principles which give people a sense of stability and integrity and most of all,it loses all sense of cause and effect so mathematicians can have the clockwork solar system and modeling as a point of departure for more duplicity and pretense. The solution is clear to me. You need to stop reading immediately! What you have been doing is mobbing,it is a disorder as you have no interest in the details but rather you perceive the real principles as a threat to your indoctrination as opposed to others who use a silent treatment to convey a different form of the indoctrinated mind .I am not an empiricist so it doesn't matter anyway therefore that leaves me to find interesting and interested people who can genuinely reason and adjust to what contemporary imaging dictates. You now have a 'new' version to contend with where there is an idealistic rotation once in 24 hours in 1820 however you will see no conflict with what you previously believed and that is why it sadly is a disorder that I would wish people escape from - "At the time of the dinosaurs, Earth completed one rotation in about 23 hours," says MacMillan, who is a member of the VLBI team at NASA Goddard. "In the year 1820, a rotation took exactly 24 hours, or 86,400 standard seconds. Since 1820, the mean solar day has increased by about 2.5 milliseconds." NASA |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
On Feb 22, 7:14*pm, oriel36 wrote:
You now have a 'new' version to contend with where there is an idealistic rotation once in 24 hours in 1820 however you will see no conflict with what you previously believed and that is why it sadly is a disorder that I would wish people escape from - "At the time of the dinosaurs, Earth completed one rotation in about 23 hours," says MacMillan, who is a member of the VLBI team at NASA Goddard. "In the year 1820, a rotation took exactly 24 hours, or 86,400 standard seconds. Since 1820, the mean solar day has increased by about 2.5 milliseconds." As I have noted, you are exactly right that there is no clockwork rotation with 24 hours as its period unmodified by the Equation of Time which is a motion of the Earth. But what you quote is simply a flawed attempt at simplification by tossing out technical details, not a "new story"; it is precisely because the rotation relative to the fixed stars, of 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds _is_ a clockwork rotation with a uniform time that it is held to be the Earth's "real" rotational motion. John Savard |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:08:12 -0800, oriel36 wrote:
The nub of this situation is. . .(and blah, blah, blah) The real nub of this situation is how much longer you are going to play this game. I haven't visited this group for almost two years and now find that you are still at this waste of time. -- Martin R. Howell Ditch Windoze. Get ubuntu. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
On Feb 24, 5:24*am, "Martin R. Howell"
wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:08:12 -0800, oriel36 wrote: The nub of this situation is. . .(and blah, blah, blah) The real nub of this situation is how much longer you are going to play this game. *I haven't visited this group for almost two years and now find that you are still at this waste of time. -- Martin R. Howell Ditch Windoze. *Get ubuntu. Want to see what your last 'contribution' was to this forum,as unique as it was sickening - https://groups.google.com/group/sci....dd505ccc?hl=en When you reach that obscene low then forget about it. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The core question
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:25:10 -0800, oriel36 wrote:
On Feb 24, 5:24Â*am, "Martin R. Howell" wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:08:12 -0800, oriel36 wrote: The nub of this situation is. . .(and blah, blah, blah) The real nub of this situation is how much longer you are going to play this game. Â*I haven't visited this group for almost two years and now find that you are still at this waste of time. -- Martin R. Howell Ditch Windoze. Â*Get ubuntu. Want to see what your last 'contribution' was to this forum,as unique as it was sickening - https://groups.google.com/group/sci....a350ddd505ccc? hl=en When you reach that obscene low then forget about it. Perhaps you missed Palsings reply to my post which you cited. His reply is located two beneath mine in the link you provided. But, let me save you the trouble of going to it. Here it is: C'mon. Admit it. You are touching yourself as you write this stuff. HA! Best reply of the year... -- Ditch Windoze. Get ubuntu. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about Jupiter's anti-gravity core | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 4 | May 15th 08 06:51 AM |
Core sample question | TVDad Jim | History | 1 | March 6th 06 10:32 PM |
Getting to the Core ??????? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | November 27th 05 04:03 AM |
Question: rotation of the Sun's core? | OkeeDokee | Misc | 9 | January 23rd 05 10:10 AM |
Question: rotation of the Sun's core? | Twittering One | Misc | 0 | January 22nd 05 10:40 PM |