|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Points I have proved/ filter adjustment needed?
Hello,
This is to advise those who have me plonked that my fiber optics go in today so you made need to adjust your filters. "Courtesy emails" will not be issued. :-) If you use the name Paul Maxson in your filters it [your filter] will still work so there should be no reason to 'replonk' and double plonk etc. So save the grand standing please. OM will surely do a quad plonk because he is... well OM. The Fiber Optic cable is AMAZING! 100MBps and it is as thin as 6 lb test fishing line! I just stared at it in awe compared to 10baseT. Anyways. this is what I have proven here. 1. You can "debate to learn" unless you are a "mall guard." Double standard. 2. Someone called my sister an inbred. I used quoted from OM (Bob Mosley) to talk back to the poster (OM.) I used things he said to me online in quotes and sent them back to him. I received an email saying they could be taken as threats so "be careful." If it wasn't taken as treats when OM posted it why is it taken as threats when I posted it? Double standard. 3. You can be an Aerospace Engineer/Attorney/PhD and talk like a 10 year old and you will be votes in as Chief. I.e., "little man, Plonk." You do not have to prove you credential unless you are a Maxson. Double standard. 4. When my father starts sharing more info as requested the group gets flooded with sock puppets who are members here in good standing during slack times. Then they ask him why he doesn't share more. Double talk. 5. Double Standards abound here in this clique. It's a clique and you are either in or out. If you are out the in people will hound you till the cows come home. 6. Some here have 3 or more handles to post through but if a Maxson does he is an inbred trailer trash ******* psychotic troll. Double Standard. 7. OM needs some serious counseling but the group is afraid of him. I'm still working on why that is but I have a theory. I proved more but the Fiber Optic guy is here so that's it for now. When I return my email addy will be different. This is a courtesy notice. Paul Maxson |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Proved? That's not Funny Ha-Ha, that's Funny Sad
"Michael Gardner" wrote in message
... In article EjeYa.82504$o%2.37988@sccrnsc02, "Paul Maxson" wrote: Probably a waste of time, but I think the Bible your ancestor occasionally refers to says that the average person has a God-given obligation to help those who clearly need help, so I might as well try... Besides, I'm killing time at the moment: 1. You can "debate to learn" You don't do that. You do not have to prove you credential unless you are a Maxson. Double standard. You bet your ass, since several people here are "known quantities" with actual engineering creds who answer questions about said credibiliy when asked, unlike you & your kinfolk. Not to mention that most people here seem SECURE in their credentials, instead of, say, reacting like a vampire under a heat lamp when they get asked why they feel that they are qualified to create fantasies about why a technical, scientific system designed by actual engineers supposedly did the impossible. Y'all seem to have a real problem with... You know... PROVING stuff. With EVIDENCE. That other people can actually believe and even *gasp shock horror* independently verify. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=evidence If I came in here and made wild-ass claims that somehow the entire world was really not functioning the way it was supposed to, I'd be asked to do the same thing, no? Amazing how you are simultaneously A. The only people who don't understand this and B. The only people making wild claims that nobody can verify and C. The only people actively pimping a book about your claims. 7. OM needs some serious counseling but the group is afraid of him. I'm still working on why that is but I have a theory. Afraid of him? Like he's going to bite me through the monitor? OM is OM. Shrug. Funny you should mention anybody needing counseling... That's downright perverse, considering the source. As for the personal stuff... It's Usenet. That doesn't make it right, but it's not like that's unprecendeted. Surely the same thing happens anywhere you get people into groups? Terrence Daniels --------------------- 1 Year at Northeastern University (dropped out & worked for a year) Associate of Applied Arts in Computer Animation, March 2001, Art Institute of Dallas 1 Semester at Framingham State College (currently attending) Bachelor of Arts in Art expected in May 2004. Disclaimer: I make no claims to be any smarter than your average 8-buck-an-hour stocker/cashier who's read a few books on technical stuff. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Proved? That's not Funny Ha-Ha, that's Funny Sad
In article et,
Terrence Daniels wrote: "Michael Gardner" wrote in message ... In article EjeYa.82504$o%2.37988@sccrnsc02, "Paul Maxson" wrote: Probably a waste of time, but I think the Bible your ancestor occasionally refers to says that the average person has a God-given obligation to help those who clearly need help, so I might as well try... Besides, I'm killing time at the moment: 1. You can "debate to learn" You don't do that. You do not have to prove you credential unless you are a Maxson. Double standard. You bet your ass, since several people here are "known quantities" with actual engineering creds who answer questions about said credibiliy when asked, unlike you & your kinfolk. If credentials were all that mattered, Challenger and Columbia would still be flying. Not to mention that most people here seem SECURE in their credentials, instead of, say, reacting like a vampire under Yes, most people do seem secure. But I don't think you're referring to most people, but rather some of the noisiest. They sound anything *but* secure. Replying to a post concerning the Challenger with witty lines like "They're all trailer trash" reflects a high level of insecurity. a heat lamp when they get asked why they feel that they are qualified to create fantasies about why a technical, scientific system designed by actual engineers supposedly did the impossible. Y'all seem to have a real problem with... You know... PROVING stuff. With EVIDENCE. That other people can actually believe and even *gasp shock horror* independently verify. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=evidence If I came in here and made wild-ass claims that somehow the entire world was really not functioning the way it was supposed to, I'd be asked to do the same thing, no? Amazing how you are simultaneously A. The only people who don't understand this and B. The only people making wild claims that nobody can verify and C. The only people actively pimping a book about your claims. So you disagree. That's healthy. 7. OM needs some serious counseling but the group is afraid of him. I'm still working on why that is but I have a theory. Afraid of him? Like he's going to bite me through the monitor? OM is OM. Shrug. Funny you should mention anybody needing counseling... That's downright perverse, considering the source. And JM is JM. Yet you prefer the postings of one who can rarely get through a post without hurling some silly epithets to those of a man whose scientific credibility you doubt? And you further question the mental health of the latter, but not the former? I guess it's your business. As for the personal stuff... It's Usenet. That doesn't make it right, but it's not like that's unprecendeted. Surely the same thing happens anywhere you get people into groups? Well, not in person. In any event, this whole "Maxson" obsession sounds like something from the Beverly Hillbillies. "We's a-feudin' with them thar Maxsons, be sure not to talk with 'em, ya hear?". And I'm seriously supposed to accept as "scientific" the opinions of those who allow themselves to be drawn into it? Steve |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Points I have proved/ filter adjustment needed?
Yes Mike,
Fiber Optics. It's fiber wire converted into Cat 5 and goes straight into your NIC (no coax and no cable modem.) I must say I am real happy with it. I ended at a spot in Computer Information Science right when we were getting into what Fiber Optics would do in the future, now it's here. The difference is not only on the download but on the up speed too and I am jazzed! It doesn't suffer bandwidth limits like Cable either. I have no desire to address anything else in your post tonight but the technology and so people can readjust their filters as required. I do so as a courtesy for those who do not wish to read me. I will defend myself when attacked here, that is my reiteration and has been since 2000. Other than that I don't post much here. Check this out though. http://www.dslreports.com/archive I am using #1 on the chart, then scroll down to ATT Cable #25 and compare the up and down speeds! I did a speed test (that's an old chart) and the numbers were *much* higher. Winfirst backers (the money men) lost money on the market and backed out too soon and SureWest bought them out, or so the story goes around here. Why is it that I am always "claiming" something yet your buddies you conspire with post stuff as gospel written in stone? Never mind don't answer that. I don't need any further abuse, I'm having a good day. L8TR "Michael Gardner" wrote in message ... In article EjeYa.82504$o%2.37988@sccrnsc02, "Paul Maxson" wrote: Hello, This is to advise those who have me plonked that my fiber optics go in today so you made need to adjust your filters. "Courtesy emails" will not be issued. :-) If you use the name Paul Maxson in your filters it [your filter] will still work so there should be no reason to 'replonk' and double plonk etc. So save the grand standing please. OM will surely do a quad plonk because he is... well OM. The Fiber Optic cable is AMAZING! 100MBps and it is as thin as 6 lb test fishing line! I just stared at it in awe compared to 10baseT. Anyways. this is what I have proven here. 1. You can "debate to learn" unless you are a "mall guard." Double standard. 2. Someone called my sister an inbred. I used quoted from OM (Bob Mosley) to talk back to the poster (OM.) I used things he said to me online in quotes and sent them back to him. I received an email saying they could be taken as threats so "be careful." If it wasn't taken as treats when OM posted it why is it taken as threats when I posted it? Double standard. 3. You can be an Aerospace Engineer/Attorney/PhD and talk like a 10 year old and you will be votes in as Chief. I.e., "little man, Plonk." You do not have to prove you credential unless you are a Maxson. Double standard. 4. When my father starts sharing more info as requested the group gets flooded with sock puppets who are members here in good standing during slack times. Then they ask him why he doesn't share more. Double talk. 5. Double Standards abound here in this clique. It's a clique and you are either in or out. If you are out the in people will hound you till the cows come home. 6. Some here have 3 or more handles to post through but if a Maxson does he is an inbred trailer trash ******* psychotic troll. Double Standard. No double standards. No one posts unprovable conspiracy theories like a Maxson. It stands to reason they'd be treated differently. I don't question your father's intent - or that he thinks he is doing the right thing. The simple fact however is that he is wrong. That doesn't justify all the things that have been said here - but if you go out in the rain, you get wet. 7. OM needs some serious counseling but the group is afraid of him. I'm still working on why that is but I have a theory. I proved more but the Fiber Optic guy is here so that's it for now. Fiber Optic guy? New address - are you claiming to be getting Fiber Optic connectivity to the internet? What speed, equipment and service? Last time I saw someone actually advertising Fiber Optic Service they were really a cable company that happened to be using fiber in its trunk lines..... When I return my email addy will be different. This is a courtesy notice. Paul Maxson -- Real Working Engineer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Proved? That's not Funny Ha-Ha, that's Funny Sad
"Terrence Daniels" wrote:
You know... PROVING stuff. With EVIDENCE. That other people can actually believe and even *gasp shock horror* independently verify. Uh, if I am so stupid how come you are the one looking up my links? I don't need your dictionary links (thanks for being a copycat). -- Daniel Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Proved!!!!!
Terrence Daniels
--------------------- 1 Year at Northeastern University (dropped out & worked for a year) Associate of Applied Arts in Computer Animation, March 2001, Art Institute of Dallas 1 Semester at Framingham State College (currently attending) Bachelor of Arts in Art expected in May 2004. Disclaimer: I make no claims to be any smarter than your average 8-buck-an-hour stocker/cashier who's read a few books on technical stuff. Hey genius, I didn't work for Lockheed and I didn't write the book can you separate facts? My fathers and brothers credentials would be longer than your final exam. Brother Daniel Microbiologist/Scientist / Manager of many for the *County after numerous ribbons/medals in the USAF. *I think he is close to 25 years there! Father John Programming computers before you were born. BA in Mathematics before they passed out calculators. Army Intelligence, spoke *several* different languages. Debugged Shuttle Flight Software when you were in grade school. Why do I even bother, he has a genius IQ and is labeled a "janitor." Sister RN Heart Specialist 13 years at the same hospital called in for emergency heart situations at all hours. Mother Licensed and *Ordained* Minister 20 years retired LVN Brother; deceased Army/USMC Vet (and ridiculed here just as we are even though he had NEVER even been to a newsgroup. Me, started as private security officer in 1981 after serving in the USN. Made Director of Security for CAL PERS in 10 years managing 20 people for almost 8 years, had my own office and wrote their policy books. Went into Armored Transport for 3 years. Switched to a County Contract, then City then made Lieutenant at the Airport supervising 7 Officers. 75% of the jobs I have taken I have made Lieutenant. 8 month background and testing and now I work Federal. Yet I am a "mall guard." There, credential that into your file, it won't stop the abuse though because we are TARGETS. Think what you want net abuser, things are not always as they seem. You are starting off your young college career by being a net abuser and picking on the family above? You are part of what is an actionable civil and criminal lawsuit and you haven't even graduated yet. Nice...... Paul Maxson |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Proved!!!!!
"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message
news On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 00:32:42 -0700, "Paul Maxson" wrote: Hey genius, [SNIP] ...Oh ****. Looks like the pettty little hire-a-nazi had to get a new ISP. Guess comcast finally got tired of the complaints, huh? Probably explains why he dared me earlier in the week to complain about him trying to harass me in e-mail again. Tsk. What shall we do, kids, what shall we do? PLONK ...There. Back in Killfile Hell with the rest of the family where he belongs. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr From just a few hours ago. "If you use the name Paul Maxson in your filters it [your filter] will still work so there should be no reason to 'replonk' and double plonk etc. So save the grand standing please. OM will surely do a quad plonk because he is... well OM." TADA! Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 Doesn't allow you to filter by name? Why don't you learn to use your newsreader then you will free up all the time you spend plonking, harassing others, making threats and filing ISP complaints. P.S. Watch your language this is a family group. Why oh why does this group support you? To me it speaks volumes about the targeted net abuse by the RING. Lining up like ducks to take shots at us. Net Abuse at it's finest and it WILL stop. Nice.... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Proved!!!!!
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 00:32:42 -0700, "Paul Maxson"
wrote: Hey genius, [SNIP] ....Oh ****. Looks like the pettty little hire-a-nazi had to get a new ISP. Guess comcast finally got tired of the complaints, huh? Probably explains why he dared me earlier in the week to complain about him trying to harass me in e-mail again. Tsk. What shall we do, kids, what shall we do? PLONK ....There. Back in Killfile Hell with the rest of the family where he belongs. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Points I have proved/ filter adjustment needed?
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:33:25 -0500, Michael Gardner
wrote: Fiber Optic guy? New address - are you claiming to be getting Fiber Optic connectivity to the internet? ....Oh boy. It just means that he thinks he'll be able to flood the groups faster with his dizum abuse and other sock puppet accounts. Truth be told, most uplinks are actually slower than the downlink, and when you consider he'll be surfing for kiddie porn as well, when the bandwidth usage all balances out he'll be trolling at the same rate or slightly lower than he normally does. Not that it matters once you plonk his inbred ass into your killfiles, natch... OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Proved? That's not Funny Ha-Ha, that's Funny Sad
"Alan Erskine" wrote ...
"Charleston" wrote in message news:N5mYa.63286$zy.24188@fed1read06... "Terrence Daniels" wrote: You know... PROVING stuff. With EVIDENCE. That other people can actually believe and even *gasp shock horror* independently verify. Note the use of UPPER CASE mixed in with lowar CASE on occasion. Typical of a Maxson. plonk (or should that be PlOnK) Note the quote level indicating Terrence Daniels' text rather than that of 'Charelston' is that quoted by you above. If you're going to plonk someone for using a mix of lowar(sic.) and upper case it should ideally be for something they've actually written. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|