A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old December 10th 17, 01:08 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 07:21:11 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 03:09:51 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:48:58 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:52:51 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 19:57:34 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:47:16 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 01:03:29 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:

Perhaps he can still learn something, and let his
hemorrhoids heal up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUZr0Wr0v-s

If you still miss the point hags,.....NASA faked Apollo

That is a lie. And I'm still waiting for your response to
the nagging radio signals to and from the moon which have
become your personal inconvient truth.

https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...-laser-funding


snip


Another fail for you Bast.


Oh **** facepalm,....that even reads like a fairytale, or a
harry potter novel. Maybe Lord Voldemort helped them aim the
antenna ??

I don't see you refuting anything, Bastie ..... Maybe if you
didn't live in a fantasy land?

You write a few lines of crap that you are virtually claining
is verified by SNOPES ?

Nope. Stop lying Bast.

You do realize that even if I swallow your version of events,
you just made my argument for me, don't you ?

I'll give you a little hint, Bastie: I know all about
satellites. But go on....

If you have a moving satellite (closer) or the moon (farther
away) Of course a signal from a satellite will keep requiring
re-aiming, where the moon farther away would not appear to move
quickly from your reference point on earth.

This is all simple enough to sort out.

Your claim is about a moving satellite in space.

The burden of proof is therefore on you to name, specifically,
the satellite(s) we have in orbit in 1969 which had the
capabilities you claim in your argument?

And be specific, Bast. All satellites are named and or numbered
and tracked.

I anxiously await your answer to my question.

Are you really that dumb that you don't think the military has
their own satellites ?

Good question Bastie! Let's try this again since the info on the
comsat's I'm asking about in 1969 is NO LONGER CLASSIFIED:

The burden of proof is therefore on you to name, specifically, the
satellite(s) we have in orbit in 1969 which had the capabilities
you claim in your argument?

And be specific, Bast. All satellites are named and or numbered
and tracked.

And no one outside of the military knows where they are ,

Bastie, any good collegiate Astronomy class can track the
satellites in space. There is a University in the UK who takes
great pride in tracking all the satellites in space.


Riiggghhhht.

I'm not seeing any answer to my question, Bastie.

And I'm sure they even track all the steath aircraft in the world,
and sell that information to those bad ol' Ruskies.

And BTW,.....did they have this wonderful database ALREADY
ESTABLISHED BACK IN THE 1960'S ?

The info on the satellites in orbit in 1969 is readily available on
the web. I'm hard pressed to see why you keep stalling and don't
produce an answer to my question. I'm beginning to think you're
nothing but a liar and a fraud. smirk

Geez,.....no wonder the Iraqis were able to hide all those W.M.D
from us,....The damn British /POL Geeks . sold us out.

WMD's are stealthy?

Are you this desperate to wiggle out of answering a simple question?
Again?

You really are a piece of work aren't you

Time for you to flounce off again?


If you can come up with secret UK Universities that know everything
that happens in the cosmos.

I never said they were "secret" UK universities.

See how you so easily lie, Bast.


You also did not /could not give a name, or a location, or contact
information on the web.


Of what? Civilian tracking of satellites? We have a satellite
tracking dish on our house. We track 5 satellites at one time.

It's called DirecTV.

Here are two US Universities who track satellites

1. Univ. Of Texas

The site was created by James Yoder, an electrical and computer
engineering student at the University of Texas at Austin.

Read mo
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...#ixzz50no9S14f
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

2. Univ. Of Arizona

https://uanews.arizona.edu/story/stu...ack-satellites

I'm not doing the research for you bast, you lazy Lezbo.

That sounds pretty SECRET to me.


That's because you're not very bright.






Changing your story already ?
What happened to your UK source ? Did they get bought out and turned into a
Taco Bell ?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FR Bending of Light -- Proof oriel36[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 0 January 25th 10 08:14 PM
FR Bending of Light philippeb8 Astronomy Misc 221 December 8th 09 06:31 PM
A question about the bending of light. brian a m stuckless Policy 0 May 1st 06 11:46 PM
A question about the bending of light. brian a m stuckless Policy 0 May 1st 06 04:53 PM
A question about the bending of light. brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 May 1st 06 04:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.