|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
June 16th 09, 10:26 AM
posted to sci.space.policy
|
|||
|
|||
again... I was 100% right about the Ares-1
----
"Study Finds Human-rated Delta IV Cheaper" http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/gener...20IV%20Cheaper ---- this study ordered by NASA clearly demonstrates that (despite ALL NASA claims, so far) NASA wasn't (and still isn't) so "sure" that the Ares-1 can work and fly... ---- that actually IS what I've said from 2006, he ---- http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/011srb5.html ---- and from 2007 in this article: ---- http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/012arescantfly.html ---- also, I've already suggested an Ares-1 version with four RL-10 (as 2nd stage engines) over TWO years ago in this article: ---- http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/023newAres.html ---- the only BIG difference between the proposed "SuperDeltaIV" and MY rocket-concept is that, the latter, adopts a standard SRB (as 1st stage motor) since it already IS man-rated and cheap ---- however, despite I think that the Ares-1 can't fly, I did not believe that a man-rated Delta IV Heavy could be safer than Ares-1 without a DEEP redesign of this rocket ---- 
|
|
#2
June 19th 09, 10:41 PM
posted to sci.space.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More gaetanomarano BS
On Jun 16, 5:26*am, gaetanomarano wrote:
---- I did not believe that a man-rated Delta IV Heavy could be safer than Ares-1 without a DEEP redesign of this rocket clueless again
|
|
#3
June 22nd 09, 07:24 PM
posted to sci.space.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More gaetanomarano BS
On Jun 19, 5:41*pm, Me wrote:
On Jun 16, 5:26*am, gaetanomarano wrote: ---- *I did not believe that a man-rated Delta IV Heavy could be safer than Ares-1 without a DEEP redesign of this rocket clueless again The thing about it, right or wrong, his opinion won't win any contracts. So, what good is it?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I've added FOUR updates to my Ares-1 article with some NEW calculations that (clearly) show WHY the new Ares-1 can't fly | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | November 12th 07 10:21 AM |
| The Ares-1 can't fly | gaetanomarano | Policy | 42 | November 7th 07 06:42 PM |
| NewSpace rockets __ EELVs __ Ares-I __ REVISED Orion/Ares-I __ FAST-SLV __ chances of success | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | June 16th 07 12:03 AM |
| Ares | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 34 | May 16th 07 03:06 PM |
| in my opinion (both) Ares-I and Ares-V could NEVER fly once! ...could NASA rockets win vs. privates on launch date and prices? | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | May 10th 07 11:11 PM |
Linear Mode
