a NEW comparison image CLEARLY shows HOW MUCH my "underside-LAS"is BETTER than ANY Orion's tower-LAS

gaetanomarano wrote:

On 9 Giu, 00:05, Matt wrote:

The underside design would have to be completely isolated from the
heat shield of the spacecraft, since you need the heat shield to be
pristine after you jettison the LAS after every normal liftoff.

you're right, but the only purpose of my drawing is to show the
concept, it's NOT a "project" (that, clearly, needs study and tests)

And since it is your design concept, it is incumbent upon you to study
and test it, which so far you have declined to do. What turns most
people off is your continual 'I thought of it first' approach to design
concept analysis. We're looking for something a little more concrete.

If you could even address criticisms that would be nice. Of course, I
will be the first to admit that I too suffer from the same delusions,
about for instance ... cryogenic propulsion. However, I am interested in
cryogenic propulsion mainly as a technology driver, and I am not so
concerned about the economic viability of it, since the problems with
hydrocarbon combustion are far greater than just economic concerns.

wrote in message
...
On Jun 7, 6:37 pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
However, it's still unclear WHY did NASA wants to launch so much "dead
weight" with its Orion!!!

Because your underside-LAS can't work and you don't have the
capability to prove that it will.

Stop replying to this moron. He's not an aerospace engineer. He just likes
to play one on the Internet and pretend he "thought of it first".

Jeff
--
A clever person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein

wrote in message
...
On Jun 8, 10:29 am, kT wrote:
gaetanomarano wouldn't know the first thing to do in Orbiter. Plus he
couldn't properly estimate the weights involved, which is the whole
issue with his LAS design. He assumes it is lighter but has no work
to back it up. He just says it should be, which is totally wrong

You need to stop replying to kT as well. He doesn't know what he's talking
about.

Jeff
--
A clever person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein

Jeff Findley wrote:

On Jun 8, 10:29 am, kT wrote:
gaetanomarano wouldn't know the first thing to do in Orbiter. Plus he
couldn't properly estimate the weights involved, which is the whole
issue with his LAS design. He assumes it is lighter but has no work
to back it up. He just says it should be, which is totally wrong

You need to stop replying to kT as well. He doesn't know what he's talking
about.

Which is why that which 'he doesn't know what he's talking about' is
occasionally published in peer reviewed journals.

Anytime you've got something that you feel is publishable, feel free to
give us a link.

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:37:15 -0400, "Jeff Findley"
wrote:

Stop replying to this moron. He's not an aerospace engineer. He just likes
to play one on the Internet and pretend he "thought of it first".

....Jeff, we've already tried this with Charlie. Same result as that
guy last year claiming to be a former NASA employee who flat-out
refused to stop flamining this same pack of trolling trash. Just send
Charlie to Killfile Hell and don't bust your balls trying to convert
him. He's obviously as clueless as they are.

OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

"OM" wrote in message
...
...Jeff, we've already tried this with Charlie. Same result as that
guy last year claiming to be a former NASA employee who flat-out
refused to stop flamining this same pack of trolling trash.

I think it's the same bloke. Same posting style, same attitude.

On Jun 9, 12:38 pm, "Alan Erskine" wrote:
"OM" wrote in message

...

...Jeff, we've already tried this with Charlie. Same result as that
guy last year claiming to be a former NASA employee who flat-out
refused to stop flamining this same pack of trolling trash.

I think it's the same bloke. Same posting style, same attitude.

I am the same guy.

OM, you are an asshole. The last few months for you has been proof of
the verse "you shall reap what you sow"

wrote:
On Jun 9, 12:38 pm, "Alan Erskine" wrote:
"OM" wrote in message

...

...Jeff, we've already tried this with Charlie. Same result as that
guy last year claiming to be a former NASA employee who flat-out
refused to stop flamining this same pack of trolling trash.
I think it's the same bloke. Same posting style, same attitude.

I am the same guy.

OM, you are an asshole. The last few months for you has been proof of
the verse "you shall reap what you sow"

Indeed, and OM (Robert Mosley III of Austin, Texas) the asshole has a
lot of asshole friends here as well. Basically, you have a clique of
assholes who have killfiled everybody but themselves, and a bunch of
free spirits, crackpots, nuts, and true space activists, who post
whatever they want, whenever they want. The assholes continually spam
the ISPs of the free spirits, complaining about TOS violations, in a
futile effort to shut down discussion about anything not related to
their asshole delusions, while the free spirits just say what they want.

You decide.

wrote in message
...
On Jun 9, 12:38 pm, "Alan Erskine" wrote:
"OM" wrote in message

...

...Jeff, we've already tried this with Charlie. Same result as that
guy last year claiming to be a former NASA employee who flat-out
refused to stop flamining this same pack of trolling trash.

I think it's the same bloke. Same posting style, same attitude.

I am the same guy.

In that case, PLONK!

Jeff
--
A clever person solves a problem.
A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein