A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 21st 04, 10:41 PM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/features.cfm?feature=605

Apollo 11 Experiment Still Going Strong after 35 Years
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Media contact: Charli Schuler (818) 393-5467
July 20, 2004

It was the summer of '69. Director John Schlesinger's "Midnight Cowboy"
had won the Oscar for Best Picture; the Rolling Stones' newly released
"Honky Tonk Women" was climbing the charts; 400,000 people were gearing
up to attend Woodstock?and America landed on the Moon, making "one giant
leap for mankind."

On the afternoon of July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong
and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin explored the surface of the Moon for two and a
half hours, collecting samples and taking photographs while Michael
Collins orbited in the command module Columbia. On July 21, about an
hour before the end of their final moonwalk, they left an experiment on
the lunar surface which, after 35 years, continues to work as well as it
did the day it got there. Called the lunar laser ranging experiment, it
studies the Earth-Moon system and returns data to scientific centers
around the world, including NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

"An accurate knowledge of the Moon's orbit and orientation is needed for
future robotic and manned missions to our satellite," said Dr. James G.
Williams, one of four JPL scientists who analyze the data from the Lunar
Laser Ranging Experiment. "Scientists have been able to use the data
they received through lunar laser ranging to study the Earth, the Moon
and the character of gravity."

Scientists from various institutions who analyze the data from the lunar
laser ranging experiment have observed, among other things, that the
Moon is moving away from the Earth and has a fluid core, and that
Einstein's Theory of Relativity is accurate.

The experiment consists of an instrument called the lunar laser ranging
reflector, designed to reflect pulses of laser light fired from the
Earth. The idea was to determine the round-trip travel time of a laser
pulse from the Earth to the Moon and back again, thereby calculating the
distance between the two bodies to unprecedented accuracy. Unlike the
other scientific experiments left on the Moon, this reflector requires
no power and is still functioning perfectly after 35 years.

The Apollo 11 laser reflector consists of 100 fused silica half cubes,
called corner cubes, mounted in a 46-centimeter (18-inch) square
aluminum panel. Each corner cube is 3.8 centimeters (1.5 inches) in
diameter. Corner cubes reflect a beam of light directly back toward its
point of origin; it is this fact that also makes them so useful in Earth
surveying.

Three more reflectors have since been left on the Moon, including two by
later Apollo 14 and 15 missions and one (built by the French) on the
unmanned Soviet Lunokhod 2 rover. Each of the reflectors rests on the
lunar surface in such a way that its flat face points toward the Earth.

The McDonald Observatory in Western Texas and a second observatory near
the city of Grasse in southern France regularly send a laser beam
through an optical telescope to hit one of the reflectors. The
reflectors are too small to be seen from Earth, so even when the beam is
correctly aligned in the telescope, actually hitting a lunar reflector
is quite challenging. At the Moon's surface, the beam is a few
kilometers or miles wide and scientists liken the task of properly
aiming the beam to using a rifle to hit a moving dime 3.2 kilometers
(two miles) away.

Once the laser beam hits a reflector, scientists at the observatories
use sensitive filtering and amplification equipment to detect any return
signal. The reflected light is too weak to be seen with the human eye,
but under good conditions, one photon -- the fundamental particle of
light -- will be received every few seconds.

The lunar laser ranging experiment is the only lunar investigation
continuously operating since the Apollo project. Improvements in lasers
and electronics over the years have led to measurements currently
accurate to about 2 centimeters (less than one inch).

Scientists know the average distance between the centers of the Earth
and the Moon is 385,000 kilometers (239,000 miles), implying that the
modern lunar ranges have relative accuracies of better than one part in
10 billion. This level of accuracy represents one of the most precise
distance measurements ever made and is equivalent to determining the
distance between Los Angeles and New York to one hundredth of an inch.

"Technical improvements at the observatories rejuvenate the lunar laser
ranging effort," Williams said. "When the range accuracy improves, it is
like getting a new experiment on the Moon."

To this end, a new lunar ranging instrument with significantly improved
accuracy is being constructed at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico
by the University of California at San Diego and the University of
Washington.

"The usefulness of continued improvements in range determinations for
further advancing our understanding of the Earth-Moon system will keep
the lunar reflectors in service for years to come," Williams said.
  #2  
Old July 22nd 04, 08:57 AM
Wally Anglesea
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have a couple of small question about the laser reflectors.

We know abouyt the corner prisms, and the reflectors are postioned to point
at the earth.

Was there any need for design tolerances so that the actual angle of the
whole reflector assembly was optimised to point at the eart, or was this
simply unneccessary?

Did the astronauts simply position them in a "that looks close enough" way,
or was there some method to the procedure?


  #3  
Old July 22nd 04, 11:15 AM
Bart Declercq
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wally Anglesea wrote:

I have a couple of small question about the laser reflectors.

We know abouyt the corner prisms, and the reflectors are postioned to
point at the earth.

Was there any need for design tolerances so that the actual angle of the
whole reflector assembly was optimised to point at the eart, or was this
simply unneccessary?

Did the astronauts simply position them in a "that looks close enough"
way, or was there some method to the procedure?


The whole reason they used "Corner Cubes" is that "Looks close enough" works
with them, any light falling onto them from a reasonable angle (margin of
20-30 degrees if I remember corrrectly).
Besides, if they had to point extremely accurately, the experiment couldn't
have kept on working, as the moon is continually wobbling, so much so that
in a telescope you can easily see the perspective changing (see
http://www.stargazing.net/david/moon/moonlibration.html ) which would turn
the reflector a considerable ways away from where it was originally
pointing.

Bart

  #4  
Old July 22nd 04, 03:36 PM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Wally Anglesea wrote:
Was there any need for design tolerances so that the actual angle of the
whole reflector assembly was optimised to point at the eart, or was this
simply unneccessary?
Did the astronauts simply position them in a "that looks close enough" way,
or was there some method to the procedure?


There was a systematic procedure for getting the thing pointed roughly
correctly (and likewise for the ALSEP radio antenna, which was also
moderately directional), but no requirement that it be exact. Corner-cube
reflectors reflect light back in the direction it came from, independent
of which direction that is (within limits).
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert |
  #5  
Old July 22nd 04, 07:00 PM
Neil Gerace
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron" wrote in message
om...
At the Moon's surface, the beam is a few
kilometers or miles wide and scientists liken the task of properly
aiming the beam to using a rifle to hit a moving dime 3.2 kilometers
(two miles) away.


If your rifle has a duty cycle approaching that of a beam of light, you'll
hit that dime soon enough


  #6  
Old August 1st 04, 12:46 PM
William C. Keel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In sci.space.history Peter Munn wrote:

Yes, I thought diffraction would have such an effect. At the distance
of the moon and with visible wavelengths, wouldn't you need a near-
perfect reflector 10m to 20m across if you wanted a near-perfect return
beam? (10-20m measured in wavelengths being approximately the square
root of the total distance in wavelengths).


And, correspondingly, isn't it misleading to think of an individual
photon having been reflected by a particular corner-cube? Don't the
wave characteristics of light mean that the places photons end up are a
feature of an interference pattern from reflections off all the corner-
cubes?


"If it's not weird, it's not quantum". With wavefunction collapse,
you could identify individual photons at the reflector, but only
if you (say) detected some, thereby destroying them. Fortunately
for those of us who get confused when both wave and particle guises
play a role, reflection from flat surfaces gives the same geometric-
optics results when worked out either way.

Bill Keel
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) Nathan Jones Misc 6 July 29th 04 06:14 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla UK Astronomy 11 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The apollo faq the inquirer Misc 4 April 15th 04 04:45 AM
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) Nathan Jones UK Astronomy 8 February 4th 04 07:48 PM
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) Kazmer Ujvarosy UK Astronomy 3 December 25th 03 11:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.