A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SuperDraco's Also Key to Falcon 9 Reuse?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 1st 12, 10:21 PM posted to sci.space.station
Jochem Huhmann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 606
Default SuperDraco's Also Key to Falcon 9 Reuse?

Jeff Findley writes:

Powering through the atmosphere with nearly empty fuel tanks and no full
second stage and payload on top (and the center of gravity resulting
from that) *is* more difficult. A F9 first stage on its own with nearly
empty fuel tanks will try very hard to fly with the bottom forward.


If you're braking for landing, don't you want the bottom forward?


Sure, but before landing you have to fly the thing back to the launch
site. I don't think landing will be a really hard problem.


Jochem

--
"A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no
longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
  #22  
Old March 1st 12, 11:34 PM posted to sci.space.station
Dr J R Stockton[_151_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default SuperDraco's Also Key to Falcon 9 Reuse?

In sci.space.station message ev-dnQxeppPJx9PSnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@giganews.
com, Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:03:13, David Spain posted:

Jeff Findley wrote:
As far as current state of the art is concerned, I'd think that
Armadillo Aerospace has as much experience with liquid fueled rocket
powered VTVL control algorithms as anyone else in the business.


No doubt! The guys at SpaceX that think they can bring F9 stage one
down in one piece ought to talk the Armadillo folks about active
control of something with a long lever arm. Forget about cross-winds,
just pretend you're bringing the whole thing down in a vacuum. That
seems plenty hard right there. Oh and don't forget the weight in that
arm tends to shift a bit to and fro...



The long lever arm of the tankage above the main engines provides an
excellent place to mount half a dozen smallish sideways thrusters to
help keep it all upright.

Since SpaceX design in California, they'll have every reason to
disregard what the Florida brochures say about the Florida weather.

Does Stage 2 need to be fly-back? ISTM that it should be a fly-once-
round system (or 17 times round for less cross-range need).

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms and links;
Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Skylab reuse study (NASA PDF) [email protected] History 30 December 6th 05 11:06 PM
Skylab reuse study (NASA PDF) Derek Lyons Space Shuttle 0 November 30th 05 07:52 PM
SRB reuse query Andrew Gray Space Shuttle 3 August 20th 05 03:11 PM
Did the early end of Apollo kill sklabs reuse? Hallerb History 59 February 5th 04 09:03 PM
Which STS systems would you reuse? Chuck Stewart Space Shuttle 25 September 10th 03 04:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.