A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 18, 04:39 AM posted to sci.astro
Peter Riedt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one
can be calculated by the formulas
rm=Y*vm*opy
vm=rm/Y/opy
opy=rm/vm/Y
These elements of the 9 major planets are given below as an example:

Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy
MER 5,022,635 47872 0.2408416 57,909,231,029
VEN 5,022,635 35021 0.6151856 108,209,525,401
EAR 5,022,635 29785 0.9999988 149,598,319,494
MAR 5,022,635 24131 1.8807278 227,943,771,564
JUP 5,022,635 13056 11.8693454 778,342,761,465
SAT 5,022,635 9644 29.4548244 1,426,714,892,866
URA 5,022,635 6799 84.0627938 2,870,633,540,862
NEP 5,022,635 5432 164.8713207 4,498,393,012,162
PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764

rm Y opy vm=rm/Y/opy
MER 57,909,231,029 5,022,635 0.2408416 47872
VEN 108,209,525,401 5,022,635 0.6151856 35021
EAR 149,598,319,494 5,022,635 0.9999988 29785
MAR 227,943,771,564 5,022,635 1.8807278 24131
JUP 778,342,761,465 5,022,635 11.8693454 13056
SAT 1,426,714,892,866 5,022,635 29.4548244 9644
URA 2,870,633,540,862 5,022,635 84.0627938 6799
NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5,022,635 164.8713207 5432
PLU 5,906,438,090,764 5,022,635 248.2214844 4738

rm vm Y opy=rm/vm/Y
MER 57,909,231,029 47872 5,022,635 0.2408416322
VEN 108,209,525,401 35021 5,022,635 0.6151856070
EAR 149,598,319,494 29785 5,022,635 0.9999988008
MAR 227,943,771,564 24131 5,022,635 1.8807277596
JUP 778,342,761,465 13056 5,022,635 11.8693454242
SAT 1,426,714,892,866 9644 5,022,635 29.4548244442
URA 2,870,633,540,862 6799 5,022,635 84.0627938052
NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5432 5,022,635 164.8713206889
PLU 5,906,438,090,764 4738 5,022,635 248.2214843718
  #2  
Old January 17th 18, 07:54 AM posted to sci.astro
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one
can be calculated by the formulas
rm=Y*vm*opy
vm=rm/Y/opy
opy=rm/vm/Y


You rediscover the America.

Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy
[...]
PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764


"Nothing is better manifestation of ignorance in science
then an untamed precision of scientific calculations"

( A recalled title quote of unknown author
in a textbook of physical chemistry)

--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
  #3  
Old January 17th 18, 08:45 AM posted to sci.astro
Peter Riedt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 2:54:17 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one
can be calculated by the formulas
rm=Y*vm*opy
vm=rm/Y/opy
opy=rm/vm/Y


You rediscover the America.

Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy
[...]
PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764


"Nothing is better manifestation of ignorance in science
then an untamed precision of scientific calculations"

( A recalled title quote of unknown author
in a textbook of physical chemistry)

--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.


I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy.
  #4  
Old January 17th 18, 08:54 AM posted to sci.astro
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

Dne 17/01/2018 v 08:45 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 2:54:17 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun are known the missing third one
can be calculated by the formulas
rm=Y*vm*opy
vm=rm/Y/opy
opy=rm/vm/Y


You rediscover the America.

Y vm opy rm=Y*vm*opy
[...]
PLU 5,022,635 4738 248.2214844 5,906,438,090,764


"Nothing is better manifestation of ignorance in science
then an untamed precision of scientific calculations"

( A recalled title quote of unknown author
in a textbook of physical chemistry)


I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy.


Your just rediscover the consequences of the laws known for centuries.

The result precision limited to the valid digits
it the first law of numerical processing of real data.

Well, near everything you write is very easy to criticize.
It becomes boring.

--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
  #5  
Old January 17th 18, 09:01 AM posted to sci.astro
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

Dne 17/01/2018 v 08:45 Peter Riedt napsal(a):


I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy.


Your constant is nothing more then a constant dependent on G and Ms,
expressed for units used for distances, speeds and periods.

This America was discovered centuries ago.
You bring nothing new.

--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
  #6  
Old January 17th 18, 11:50 PM posted to sci.astro
Peter Riedt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 4:01:28 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 17/01/2018 v 08:45 Peter Riedt napsal(a):


I am not concerned about precision it is irrelevant in this context. What is relevant is the ability to calcuate missing orbital elements of any solar object with my constant. You and Bod keep harping about precision because you have nothing else to criticise. I'll try to keep throwing this bone to you to keep you happy.


Your constant is nothing more then a constant dependent on G and Ms,
expressed for units used for distances, speeds and periods.

This America was discovered centuries ago.
You bring nothing new.

--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.


Y can calculate missing elements of planetary orbits. The solar system is full of these constants. Do you like to know more of them? I guess not.
  #7  
Old January 18th 18, 12:17 AM posted to sci.astro
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

Dne 17/01/2018 v 23:50 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 4:01:28 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Your constant is nothing more then a constant dependent on G and Ms,
expressed for units used for distances, speeds and periods.

This America was discovered centuries ago.
You bring nothing new.


Y can calculate missing elements of planetary orbits. The solar system is full of these constants. Do you like to know more of them? I guess not.


Numbers do not know math, they cannot calculate anything.

--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
  #8  
Old January 18th 18, 07:33 AM posted to sci.astro
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun
are known the missing third one
can be calculated by the formulas


rm=Y*vm*opy
[...]


[km] = [s/year /(2pi)] * [km/s] * [year]

Your constant is an ordinary proportional constant
of relation of a circle radius in km,
the mean speed in km/s and the period in years.

If linearized, it is an indeed "powerful" formula

length = mean_speed * time


For an ellipse, it is not exact.

As it incorrectly supposes that
for the given period and semi major axis "a"
the orbit has the same mean speed
as a circular orbit would have, what is not true.

The various elliptical orbits with the same semi major axis
have the same period. But their mean speed nor the perigee speed
nor the apogee speed are NOT the same.

As the ellipse circumference is less than 2.pi.a.

But even this is not new for you,
as this was discussed with you before
ad nausea several times.


--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
  #9  
Old January 18th 18, 11:55 AM posted to sci.astro
Peter Riedt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:
Dne 17/01/2018 v 04:39 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

If two of vm, rm and opy of any object orbiting the sun
are known the missing third one
can be calculated by the formulas


rm=Y*vm*opy
[...]


[km] = [s/year /(2pi)] * [km/s] * [year]

Your constant is an ordinary proportional constant
of relation of a circle radius in km,
the mean speed in km/s and the period in years.

If linearized, it is an indeed "powerful" formula

length = mean_speed * time


For an ellipse, it is not exact.

As it incorrectly supposes that
for the given period and semi major axis "a"
the orbit has the same mean speed
as a circular orbit would have, what is not true.

The various elliptical orbits with the same semi major axis
have the same period. But their mean speed nor the perigee speed
nor the apogee speed are NOT the same.

As the ellipse circumference is less than 2.pi.a.

But even this is not new for you,
as this was discussed with you before
ad nausea several times.


--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.


Your comments are valid but irrelevant. What is relevant is Y allows to predict accurately missing elements of orbits of solar objects.
  #10  
Old January 18th 18, 09:00 PM posted to sci.astro
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default The power of Riedt's constant Y = 5022635

Dne 18/01/2018 v 11:55 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 2:33:29 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' StÅ™Ã*ž wrote:


[km] = [s/year /(2pi)] * [km/s] * [year]

Your constant is an ordinary proportional constant
of relation of a circle radius in km,
the mean speed in km/s and the period in years.

If linearized, it is an indeed "powerful" formula

length = mean_speed * time


For an ellipse, it is not exact.

As it incorrectly supposes that
for the given period and semi major axis "a"
the orbit has the same mean speed
as a circular orbit would have, what is not true.

The various elliptical orbits with the same semi major axis
have the same period. But their mean speed nor the perigee speed
nor the apogee speed are NOT the same.

As the ellipse circumference is less than 2.pi.a.

But even this is not new for you,
as this was discussed with you before
ad nausea several times.

Your comments are valid but irrelevant. What is relevant is Y allows to predict accurately missing elements of orbits of solar objects.

No, it does not.
It fits only if you deliberately choose a particular speed value.

--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635 Peter Riedt Astronomy Misc 14 January 20th 18 11:36 AM
The Fine Structure Constant is Probably Constant Yousuf Khan[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 October 19th 10 12:02 AM
Fog control big brother power power power power! gb6726 Astronomy Misc 0 November 19th 07 07:25 PM
Is Einstein's "Cosmological Constant" Really a Constant? (Forwarded) Andrew Yee News 0 January 13th 06 07:41 AM
New Quasar Studies Keep Fundamental Physical Constant Constant (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 April 28th 04 07:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.