|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.
In sci.physics Serigo wrote:
On 10/17/2016 7:51 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars. that is how limestone and marble formed on Earth, via biological action. You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be water there. obviously wrong. You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the calcium carbonate pop out. Now show me. Funny how all the large deposits on Earth are biological in origin and if it hasn't been geologically processed too much you can see the skeltons under a microscope. -- Jim Pennino |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.
Serigo wrote:
On 10/17/2016 7:51 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars. that is how limestone and marble formed on Earth, via biological action. And yet marble and other calcium minerals are found on Mars. Explain. You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be water there. obviously wrong. So reality is obviously wrong. You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the calcium carbonate pop out. No, YOU are saying that. Now show me. It's impossible to show you anything. There isn't enough dynamite in the world to blow your head out of your ass. -- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong." -- Thomas Jefferson |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.
On 10/17/2016 7:45 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote: On 10/17/2016 7:51 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: The issue is large, highly concentrated amounts and those only come from biological action, so if any large concentrated amounts of calcium based minerals were found on Mars, the headlines would be screaming about proof of previous life found on Mars. that is how limestone and marble formed on Earth, via biological action. And yet marble and other calcium minerals are found on Mars. Explain. Cite ? or are you making stuff up again. no marble on mars Your assertion, you explain it. We understand if you cant.... You're simply wrong. All it takes to get areas with rocks having a high concentration of calcium carbonate is for there to used to be water there. obviously wrong. So reality is obviously wrong. Trumps reality or Hiellarys ? You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the calcium carbonate pop out. No, YOU are saying that. again, no thought, no chemistry background, you should have replied, acidic water... but tooo Late, you have been judged by a jury of your piers and found to be..... too general. Now show me. It's impossible to show me anything. There isn't enough dynamite in the world to blow my head out of my ass. dude, I take fiber daily. and you are projecting again. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.
On 10/18/2016 9:30 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote: In sci.physics Serigo wrote: You are saying throw some dirt and water in a blender and watch the calcium carbonate pop out. Now show me. Funny how all the large deposits on Earth are biological in origin and if it hasn't been geologically processed too much you can see the skeltons under a microscope. Funny how that's not true. We've got this stuff out here called caliche, which is essentially calcium carbonate... you jump to your "not ture" conclusions way too fast caliche has some calcium carbonate from small to tiny old sea critters, the whitish stuff, but take a look at it under the microscope in some of the caliche here you can see the structures of the critters, in other caliches here we have entire shells. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.
On 10/18/2016 7:48 AM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... On 10/16/2016 8:25 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... In sci.physics Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... In sci.physics Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote: snip return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport ships. Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however that is not going to be cheap. Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". Progress! liar. YOU have not shown, nor demonstrated, that it is possible. Try again, this time hire some intelligent people to help you, and lead you. https://saboteur365.files.wordpress...._screaming.jpg You really are proving to be an annoying little troll, unwilling to even look at the evidence (including cites) provided. Jeff isn't that a great pix of Hiellary, your leader. [ugh] She has already re-purposed the funding for the "US Occupation of Planet Mars" to her remodel of the "White House" into the "White Castle" with Throne Room, and barracks for the subservient. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.
In article , says...
On 10/18/2016 7:48 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... On 10/16/2016 8:25 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... In sci.physics Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... In sci.physics Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote: snip return ship can produce liquid methane and LOX from the CO2 atmosphere and H2 brought on the ship. If we end up going that route, just keep leaving nuclear reactors on Mars brought from earth on the transport ships. Yes, just keep sending reactors until you have enough power, however that is not going to be cheap. Well, we've moved from "not possible" to "possible but not cheap". Progress! liar. YOU have not shown, nor demonstrated, that it is possible. Try again, this time hire some intelligent people to help you, and lead you. https://saboteur365.files.wordpress...._screaming.jpg You really are proving to be an annoying little troll, unwilling to even look at the evidence (including cites) provided. Jeff isn't that a great pix of Hiellary, your leader. [ugh] She has already re-purposed the funding for the "US Occupation of Planet Mars" to her remodel of the "White House" into the "White Castle" with Throne You really are being a ass aren't you? Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.
isn't that a great pix of Hiellary, your leader. [ugh] She has already re-purposed the funding for the "US Occupation of Planet Mars" to her remodel of the "White House" into the "White Castle" with Throne You really are being a ass aren't you? Jeff well you're abrasive asshole, it is what you do, but that is expected as you have little scientific/engineering facts to contribute. your "Occupy Mars" idiocy is in with the Smoke-um Dope-um crowd. and moronic "Lets build a STEEL PLANT on Mars" try building one in the USA first, extremly hard to do because of all the regulations, and now you want to go pollute a entire pristeen planet ? Space Elevator too ? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars. | Serigo | Policy | 11 | October 19th 16 12:14 PM |
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars. | Serigo | Policy | 14 | October 18th 16 02:58 AM |