A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 15th 16, 04:10 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Serigo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.

On 10/15/2016 5:49 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/14/2016 1:36 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:



Hint: ISS air is 21% oxygen. The remainder is nitrogen.


the link I found said different,


Either the link you found is preposterously wrong


from NASA website, now admit you are wrong.


looks like N2 is a problem as well


What kind of 'problem' and did you get it off the same sort of website
you got the ISS atmosphere composition from.


NASA, cant you find simple information on the internet ? Why do you
keep making stuff up ??


snip things I've known for decades


too bad you've known all the WRONG stuff.

  #2  
Old October 16th 16, 05:07 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.

Serigo wrote:

On 10/15/2016 5:49 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/14/2016 1:36 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:



Hint: ISS air is 21% oxygen. The remainder is nitrogen.


the link I found said different,


Either the link you found is preposterously wrong


from NASA website, now admit you are wrong.


Cite, you lying troll?



looks like N2 is a problem as well


What kind of 'problem' and did you get it off the same sort of website
you got the ISS atmosphere composition from.


NASA, cant you find simple information on the internet ? Why do you
keep making stuff up ??


Cite, you lying troll? I note you avoid answering the question.



snip things I've known for decades


too bad you've known all the WRONG stuff.


It was the stuff YOU posted. Are you saying everything you posted was
wrong, then?


--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
  #3  
Old October 16th 16, 08:39 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Serigo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.

On 10/15/2016 11:07 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/15/2016 5:49 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/14/2016 1:36 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:



Hint: ISS air is 21% oxygen. The remainder is nitrogen.


the link I found said different,


Either the link you found is preposterously wrong


from NASA website, now admit you are wrong.


Cite,



Actually, look at the Skylab atmosphere. It used a a 84-percent oxygen
and 16-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at a mere 3 psi instead of the
"normal" 14.7 psi, which is earth sea level pressure.

https://piv.pivpiv.dk/





looks like N2 is a problem as well


What kind of 'problem' and did you get it off the same sort of website
you got the ISS atmosphere composition from.


NASA, cant you find simple information on the internet ? Why do you
keep making stuff up ??


re-Cite,



Actually, now look at the ISS atmosphere. It used a a 54-percent
oxygen, 36-percent nitrogen and 10% CO2 breathing mixture at a 25 psi
instead of the "normal" 14.7 psi, which is earth sea level pressure.
The reason for over pressure is to counteract the small punctures by
metorites in orbit.

http://tinyurl.com/zm2xcen




snip things I've known for decades


too bad you've known all the WRONG stuff.


It was the stuff I posted. Are you saying everything I posted was
wrong, then?


seems that you are just wrong, I dont know why at all.


  #4  
Old October 16th 16, 11:13 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Thomas Koenig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX InterplanetaryTransport System to Mars.

Serigo schrieb:

Actually, now look at the ISS atmosphere. It used a a 54-percent
oxygen, 36-percent nitrogen and 10% CO2 breathing mixture at a 25 psi


This is not possible. CO2 is toxic above 3%.

http://tinyurl.com/zm2xcen


I don't follow short URLs - you don't know where they've been.
  #5  
Old October 17th 16, 12:27 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Greg \(Strider\) Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 752
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.

"Serigo" wrote in message ...

On 10/15/2016 11:07 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/15/2016 5:49 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/14/2016 1:36 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:



Hint: ISS air is 21% oxygen. The remainder is nitrogen.


the link I found said different,


Either the link you found is preposterously wrong


from NASA website, now admit you are wrong.


Cite,



Actually, look at the Skylab atmosphere. It used a a 84-percent oxygen
and 16-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at a mere 3 psi instead of the
"normal" 14.7 psi, which is earth sea level pressure.


Yes, Skylab was designed around the Apollo pressure. That has nothing to do
with what's here.



https://piv.pivpiv.dk/





looks like N2 is a problem as well


What kind of 'problem' and did you get it off the same sort of website
you got the ISS atmosphere composition from.


NASA, cant you find simple information on the internet ? Why do you
keep making stuff up ??


re-Cite,



Actually, now look at the ISS atmosphere. It used a a 54-percent oxygen,
36-percent nitrogen and 10% CO2 breathing mixture at a 25 psi instead of
the "normal" 14.7 psi, which is earth sea level pressure. The reason for
over pressure is to counteract the small punctures by metorites in orbit.


Again, as Thomas said, I'm not following a tiny URL, but I can tell you
that's categorically wrong.
Hell, I posted a link from a guy who provided access to real time data (at
the time he posted it).

And no, it's surely not that high because they're trying to replicate
Earth's atmosphere at sea level because that's what they use as a control.

And that high of O2 is a huge fire risk, for no benefit.
And that high of CO2 would be deadly.





http://tinyurl.com/zm2xcen




snip things I've known for decades


too bad you've known all the WRONG stuff.


It was the stuff I posted. Are you saying everything I posted was
wrong, then?


seems that you are just wrong, I dont know why at all.


No, you're wrong. You continue to be wrong.


--
Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net

  #6  
Old October 17th 16, 01:21 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.

Serigo wrote:

A demonstration of what an ignorant troll he is.


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
  #8  
Old October 18th 16, 02:45 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Serigo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.

On 10/18/2016 7:46 AM, Jeff Findley wrote:


Actually, look at the Skylab atmosphere. It used a a 84-percent oxygen
and 16-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at a mere 3 psi instead of the
"normal" 14.7 psi, which is earth sea level pressure.


74-percent oxygen and 26-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at 5 pounds
per square inch
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-400/ch2.htm

Jeff


forget that stuff,

how are they going to get all the furnature up there ? like the chairs,
beds, tables, desks, monitors, computers, sterios, stoves ?

you cant use a bucket for all that, and there is no IKIA nearby.


  #9  
Old October 18th 16, 04:23 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.

Jeff Findley wrote:

In article , says...

On 10/15/2016 11:07 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/15/2016 5:49 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:

On 10/14/2016 1:36 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Serigo wrote:



Hint: ISS air is 21% oxygen. The remainder is nitrogen.


the link I found said different,


Either the link you found is preposterously wrong


from NASA website, now admit you are wrong.


Cite,



Actually, look at the Skylab atmosphere. It used a a 84-percent oxygen
and 16-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at a mere 3 psi instead of the
"normal" 14.7 psi, which is earth sea level pressure.


74-percent oxygen and 26-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at 5 pounds
per square inch
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-400/ch2.htm


Which gives around 3.7 psi partial pressure of oxygen. Perfectly
fine. When you look at his claim for ISS atmosphere, you get around a
9 psi partial pressure of oxygen, which is very, very bad for you and
will probably kill you in a couple of days. That alone should tell
him he's wrong, yet he will still argue for it.

--
"Rule Number One for Slayers - Don't die."
-- Buffy, the Vampire Slayer
  #10  
Old October 18th 16, 06:18 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,rec.arts.sf.science
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,346
Default A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System to Mars.

In sci.physics Serigo wrote:
On 10/18/2016 7:46 AM, Jeff Findley wrote:


Actually, look at the Skylab atmosphere. It used a a 84-percent oxygen
and 16-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at a mere 3 psi instead of the
"normal" 14.7 psi, which is earth sea level pressure.


74-percent oxygen and 26-percent nitrogen breathing mixture at 5 pounds
per square inch
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-400/ch2.htm

Jeff


forget that stuff,

how are they going to get all the furnature up there ? like the chairs,
beds, tables, desks, monitors, computers, sterios, stoves ?

you cant use a bucket for all that, and there is no IKIA nearby.


You are losing it and getting silly.

Of course you can haul all the crap to Mars.

If it is too big or too heavy to go as one piece you send it in pieces.

Most preassembled furniture is shipped to the stores in pieces and
assembled in the store.


--
Jim Pennino
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SpaceX's 'Red Dragon' to land on Mars Nomen Nescio Policy 4 August 5th 11 06:26 AM
Interplanetary Helicopters & Interplanetary Automobiles HVAC[_2_] Misc 1 February 18th 10 09:20 PM
Pentagon Pushes for Smaller Satellites, Faster Launches [email protected] Policy 1 June 24th 07 07:20 AM
Faster to Mars with Human power. Jan Panteltje Astronomy Misc 0 January 15th 04 04:49 PM
Mars polar cap looked smaller last night!! Simon UK Astronomy 14 August 31st 03 07:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.