|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Hitting Planets Hard
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Hitting Planets Hard
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scotty Mars has been hit 100 million times. Millions of its rocks have come to Earth(easy to find on its ice) Mars has two Moons,and they did not get there by the hit theory. They are two asteroids that got "captured" It is written they came into Mars gravity field at the right speed and angle. This is in reality natures balancing act "Force of angular motion equals gravity force" Scotty an explosion can't do it. An explosion will cause it to fall back(what goes up must come down) or the explosion was powerful to create a speed(escape velocity) and the stuff will go into deep space. This is good science ,and that is some thing you Scotty lack Bert Sorry to continue throwing scientific data at you, but since you persist in lying, I have no choice. No one says that Mars' satellites were caused by initial impacts. Likely they are the result of capture. They are very small compared to Mars, so that makes the process a little easier than capturing a relatively large body like the Moon as compared to the size of the Earth. I have seen the scientific papers written by people who claim to show how it is possible to capture, but the concensus opinion is that the probability of such a narrow angle of ingress is so small as to be impossible. And then there are the similarities found between Earth rocks and Moon rocks. Exploding material from the Earth's surface by a Mars-sized object on the other hand and having it form into a satellite of about the size of the Moon has been demonstrated using computer models with gravity as the force pulling the material together. So, yes, it can be done, naturally. So stop lying about this point. And the current data supports the hypothesis and does not support capture. So, stop lying about this point. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Hitting Planets Hard
ScottY You bringing in relative size for helping your explosion
theory,.than Pluto must have been hit and out popped its Moon Asteroids are small and some have small Moons so they were also hit,and their moon has put there by colliding with another object. Oh ya All this only proves Scotty you are not a thinker. I'm sure a computer can put Moons to orbit planets by capture,or Jupiter would not have 61. That Saturn's rings were not the result of an explosion on its surface,but the result of Saturn gravitation capturing a comet that swung by at the right speed and angle. This was a snow ball comet,and easy to break up. Proof of that is the composition of the material that make up the rings. You will say this is not evidence. You will post I never give any evidence,and only make up 'capture". Yet Scotty it is natures way. Sun did not burp out of the planets. Planets did not burp up teir moons. They have to be similar having evolved out of the same nebula cloud. Nature uses explosions,and implosions to create,but not to create satellites. Nature does that by gravity,and angular motion . It is much simpler,and it fits Bert |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Hitting Planets Hard
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Hitting Planets Hard (Hudson Bay)
When looking at the Earth and observing that rounded out area known as
Hudson Bay it gave me the idea it was formed by a hit . It would be an asteroid of about 45 miles in diameter with a speed of 28,000 mph. Some evidence I read about two years ago that gave reality to this thought was "bucky balls were found all around this vast area. I wonder how much wobble to the Earth was created by this hit? Hudson Bay is up high enough(65N) At this spacetime the Earth's axial inclination is about 24 degrees Hmmmm What if it was 14 degrees before this colossal hit? That tells us after being hit the poles got more Sun light. Big weather change Bert (flame away) |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Theory on Hits
I think it's way too late for BEERTbrain, Bob! Nothing would help
him... Saul Levy On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:39:52 -0800, Bob Officer wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:12:12 -0500, in alt.astronomy, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Nospam Galaxy arms came out of the center,and your thinking is backwards. The curve of the arms show the direction of the turning of the galaxy relative to us. No they don't... The arms are not directly connected to the stellar direction. The arms are *pressure* waves... Reality is galaxies are moving apart and not coming together ,with few exceptions. Actually you are again wrong... google the Term: "Great Attractor" + Virgo. Also there is little doubt our own Local Galaxy Cluster in the process of contracting. We have carbon compounds like the "snake nebula" in every galaxy(read my post on them) they are not coming together. Read my convexing of space theory. Best to keep in mind atoms are not falling into each other and taking in size of object the micro world has more space between its objects than macro space objects I would rather not read you mindless drivel... Go figure Bert It seems you would benefit from a basic astronomy class. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Hitting Planets Hard
BEERTbrain's not too lazy, Scott. He's the male equivalent of a
female bimbo! Saul Levy On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:27:46 -0500, Scott Miller wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Dear Scott Miller professor at UL. Scott I can't even put two letters in the right order Well Scott with all that fast spin creating centrifugal force its no wonder not all the heavy elements did not go directly to the Earth's core and stay there. This has to be your reasoning. We find surface iron every where. Gold washed down from mountains. Uranium ,lead billions of tons Scott please give us a break,and do a little home work before you teach such bad science. Bert Okay, so you can't do simple mathematical first order approximations. And, a little research would say that there is not as much iron in the crust of the Earth as you seem to think. I have looked up a couple of web sites for you to visit, since you seem too lazy to do the work yourself: Moon composition: http://www.neiu.edu/~jmhemzac/mooncomp.htm Earth crust composition: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...s/elabund.html Earth composition: http://www.geography4kids.com/files/...mposition.html The last one seems to fit your mentality, hence its inclusion. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hitting Planets Hard | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 106 | February 25th 07 02:37 AM |
Meteorite seen hitting Moon | Rich | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 05 08:32 PM |
Orphaned Planets: It's a Hard Knock Life | Jason H. | SETI | 1 | March 23rd 05 03:47 PM |
three Objects hitting Sun before each of three last flares | Solar | 2 | October 29th 03 04:02 AM | |
Comets Hitting Head On | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | October 9th 03 09:39 PM |