|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PANDEMONIUM AT THE SMITHSONIUM
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/in...soldemboss.gif
SMITHSONIAN SHENANIGANS What It Doesn't Want You to See http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...hefactthat.gif http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/textbook.gif Photograph of a cross-section of bone, showing Haversian systems. Each Haversian system is seen as a nearly round area. The light circular core of each system is the Haversian canal, through which blood vessels pass. Artwork of compact bone show details of the Haversian systems. According to "Science in Archaeology," Haversian canals ALWAYS exist and are always identifiable in bone, despite its age or that it has been subjected to the process of petrification. THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF HUMAN SKULL IN THE BOULDER This is the boulder with the human skull protruding that Ed Conrad Discovered in 1982. It was found with the jawbone facing downward. The Smithsonian DID ADMIT that it does indeed resemble a human cranium but dismssed it as a rock or a concretion. http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/skulla.jpg This is another view of the boulder, with the skull ERECT. http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/skullb.jpg This is a photo of the boulder at a slight angle, revealing that the petrified human skull extends above the surface. http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa..._data/z2_2.jpg When Ed Conrad requested that the Smithsonian prepare a ground section to examine the structure of the human skull in the boulder, the request was denied. http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/rr072782.gif Ed Sends Smithsonian Granules from Object in Boulder Ed favorably followed up on the request by Raymond Rye's request and removed some granules from the rind of the object resembling a human cranium protruding from the boulder. However, before mailing them, Ed examined the granules microscopically. This is because, at this point in time, he had learned something about the identification of bone that he hadn't known during his visit to the Smithsonian a year earlier. Ed was now aware that bone contains minuscule Haversian canals and their presence is the conclusive evidence of bone, even if the bone had petrified. This scientific fact appears in the book, "Science in Archaeology," which states that neither age nor the process of petrification can remove what are known as Haversian canals, an integral part of the cell structure of bone. He had learned that, since the Haversian canals actually are passageways for nutrients to living bone, even the process of petrification cannot displace them because, as tiny tunnels, there was nothing there to begin with. Therefore, prior to sending the granules, Ed's microscopic examination revealed the presence of "pinholes" in the thinnest pieces, virtually identical to unpetrified cadaver bone at the same low magnification. http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/rr072782.gif http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/rr090982.gif EXAMINATION OF CELL STRUCTURE WAS IGNORED Ed wrote to Rye, wondering why the Smithsonian tested for mineral composition when it was supposed to examine the cell structure of the granules that had been removed from the rind of the boulder. After all, Ed maintained, Rye had stated in his letter: "We must do a microscopic study of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone." But, according to Rye, this was not done. Or, if it was, the Smithsonian wanted to hide that fact. Ed insists the Smithsonian had supplied an answer to a question -- about mineral composition -- that did not even apply in this particular case. In any event, in his response to Ed's follow-up letter, Rye rather surprisingly agreed about the necessity of having the cell structure examined. However, he offered a weak and sad explanation as to why the Smithsonian had not done so (although only a imbecile would even think its experts had not viewed the cell structure of the granules and HAD SEEN the Haversian canals, thus confirming the material IS bone and that the object embedded in the boulder IS INDEED a human cranium). http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/rr102282.gif http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/in.../quotesnew.gif MAN AS OLD AS COAL (And The Smithsonian knows it!) http://www.edconrad.com http://sci4um.com/about26245-MORE-CR...d-Conrad..html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|