|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Airlock Concept
In article ,
Jake McGuire wrote: The air in the airlock (at STP, or some approximation thereof) is expanded through a turbine or a reciprocating "expander" down to something like Martian surface pressure in an external holding tank, and the shaft work thereby obtained is used to drive the compressor of a refrigeration system used to progressively liquefy the (cooled during expansion) air from the holding tank... Venting an airlock into a low-pressure holding tank, which is in turn cleared by a scavenging system, has certainly been proposed before. (Although for rover applications, remember that the holding tank's volume has to be many times the airlock's air volume, i.e. the holding tank will be big.) But I don't recall anyone suggesting liquefying it. Bear in mind that you *cannot* liquefy a gas below its triple-point pressure. Below that pressure, there is no liquid phase, only gas and solid. (This is why dry ice doesn't melt, but goes directly to gas -- there is no liquid CO2 at 1atm.) Unfortunately, nitrogen's triple-point pressure is about 125mbar, many times Martian surface pressure. Oxygen's is much lower, and you could liquefy oxygen at Mars pressure, but not nitrogen. Whether this matters will depend on the cabin atmosphere, but a long-stay expedition is going to have at least some nitrogen in the air for health reasons, and preferably quite a lot to make air-cooled electronics possible. Cabin pressure might still be somewhat lower than Earth's to reduce prebreathing requirements, especially if the suit pressure is relatively low. ...It looks like the work available from the depressurization is approximately equal to the work needed to liquefy the air... Note that even aside from the triple-point issue, at a low pressure you'll need to cool it down somewhat farther to liquefy it. Is this insane? Aside from the triple-point problem, it's not ridiculous... but it's not obvious what advantage it would have. It is more complex and probably needs more power than just compressing the holding-tank air for injection back into the cabin as a gas. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space station hand and airlock | John Doe | Space Station | 1 | June 6th 04 08:05 PM |
Air breathing re-entry concept | Zoltan Szakaly | Technology | 15 | September 27th 03 07:19 PM |
feedback on orbiter concept? | Penguinista | Technology | 2 | August 14th 03 12:21 PM |
NASA Team Believed Foam Could Not Damage Space Shuttle | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 25th 03 08:33 AM |
Humans, Robots Work Together To Test 'Spacewalk Squad' Concept | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | July 2nd 03 04:15 PM |