"Einstein's Relativistic Train in a Tunnel Paradox: Special Relativity"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrqj88zQZJg
At 9:01 in the above video Sarah sees the train falling through the hole - an event obviously impossible in Adam's reference frame. We have reductio ad absurdum - it follows from Einstein's postulates that an event happening in Sarah's frame is absent in Adam's. Relativity should be abandoned but .... there is always salvation in Einstein's schizophrenic world. Einsteinians save their "science" by introducing an idiotic fudge factor - they teach that in Adam's frame the train undergoes a breathtaking bending (disintegration), as shown at 9:53 in the video and in this pictu
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped..._variation.PNG
We have reductio ad absurdum again: An idiotic bending (disintegration) is required - it occurs in Adam's reference frame but doesn't in Sarah's.
Conclusion: The underlying premise, Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate, is false.
Pentcho Valev