Brad Guth's Credentials

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
ups.com...

I mean, how absolutely pathetic and incest cloned dose this Usenet
crapolla that sucks and blows from hell have to get?

Dose? I don't know, what dosage does your doctor recommend?

Whatever it is, I recommend that you speak to him about increasing it substantially.

Malcolm Reynolds wrote:

Advice, Brad: Move to Canada, where the medication you need will be provided FREE!



(Cut to image of Canadian Mountie re-holstering his pistol: "I had to do
it, eh? If a horse's leg is broken, you do it, eh? His brain was
broken, eh?")

Pat

"Pat Flannery" wrote in message ...

Advice, Brad: Move to Canada, where the medication you need will be provided FREE!

(Cut to image of Canadian Mountie re-holstering his pistol: "I had to do it, eh? If a horse's leg
is broken, you do it, eh? His brain was broken, eh?")

LOL! Not just broken, eh? Like, compound brain fracture!

David Bacque,
Check out all the following incest cloned brown-nose species of your
butt-wipe minions that are so hard at work. Imagine that, I'm worth so
much brown-nosed trouble. It must be of something I've said that
upset most all of your Usenet troops.

Malcolm Reynolds seems to be going a little extra pagan and/or Usenet
postal. I wonder why that is?
-
Brad Guth

Brad Goof wrote:
I suppose at 1019 and climbing is why we'll now have to try to puch
your topic that's 100% about myself into your Usenet from hell 2000
club?
( You misspelled "punch" by the way )

Yes, but virtually all of the approximately 1000 posts, excepting
yours, say the same things namely that you are wrong, you are a kook
and that you have no credibility.

What can you expect when you insult people violently over the smallest
disagreement as well as major disagreements ??
When you claim to be an expert or have some type of degree in
"Observationology" ??
When you claim there to be intelligent life on Venus and then put up a
picture of Mars ??
Now I believe there may be some type of life in the astrosphere of
Venus, but intelligent life on the surface who are capable of
constructing dwellings ?? .... no.
AND your proof is some photo that NASA provided for you with a
resolution of no better than 100 meters ?? ... no Brad, no, this is
comical.

Brad writes:
But there really should be a door-prize for all this effort,
especially
since I've broken clean through their Usenet 1000 point of no return.

Since you clearly only want to be known for something and all this Moon
hoax stuff is your best shot at being known, the door prize should be
ours, not yours and we ask you once again to stop these non-sense
postings. That would make a great door prize.

What this 1000 posting proves is that almost everybody disagrees with
you. It's not like we are being threatened to disagree with you, we
are perfectly free to agree or disagree with you at our own whim, and
we've all said pretty much the same thing .... You are a fool.

I say that as a friend who is trying to help, I'm sorry if it hurts,
but it is true.

You would do very well by just saying you're sorry and we will all
just move on. This is a waste of everybody's time, the only winners
being those who choose to ignore you and your foolish postings, I know
I should.

The Internet Usenet is NOT an 'authority based' medium. It is a
'blind' medium of communication. IT IS NOT PROPER TO ASK FOR
CREDENTIALS!

One should not ask themselves who wrote this, but rather what is it
that is written and is before me on the screen. The words and thoughts
need to be analyzed independently of their source.

Brad Guth published pictures of his Venus find. He had blown up
satellite pictures to the point that a city road or bridge appeared.
While blurry -- because of extreme magnification -- it clearly shows a
straight line with spikes and even intervals and has strong symmetry.
That is about as good as it gets when it comes to satellite photo
interpretation.

I too, have photos of Mars taken by the Spirit Rover that show
Martians.

See: http://stardot.blogspot.com/

This is about as much proof as you can ask for. CREDENTIALS have
nothing to do with it. It is the photos themselves that either have
information or don't.

While I don't agree with most of Brad's political views I do respect
his math and science. He not only digs and finds facts, but he
'thinks' and posts his highly original thoughts. These are things much
more valuable than the 4 letter word posts of depreciation that I often
see. The very posters that scream "KOOK" are the KOOKS. They are the
one's that should be asked to post bond and made to serve time for
their stealing cyberspace from thoughful, creative, and original
posters like Brad Guth.

The 4 letter word posters try to convey the impression that they have
degrees. Well, not many people with degrees post things using 4 letter
words. They attempt to push the burden of 'authority' and 'proof' onto
the creative and original posters that are actually accomplishing
something. This just wastes cyberspace and depletes the 'real' posters
from participating in an intellectual activity that benefits mankind.

So SkeptiKooks, bug off. Stop asking stupid questions. Stop
harrassing genuine posters. Stop posting your 4 letter word crap. AND
STOP ASKING FOR CREDENTIALS, unless you can SHOW and PROVE your own
credentials.

That's right! It's SHOW and TELL guys. Brad and I want to know what
YOUR CREDENTIALS are! Do you know what credentials are? Probably not.
KOOK CITY doesn't print any.


tomcat

tomcat,
The Internet Usenet is NOT an 'authority based' medium. It is a
'blind' medium of communication. IT IS NOT PROPER TO ASK FOR
CREDENTIALS!
But these Usenet wizards and rusemasters seem to have butt loads of
their Third Reich credentials, and otherwise having certified
membership cards proving they coexist within or on behalf of our Skull
and Bones. Their mainstream status quo or bust objectives are
obviously all that truly matters.

Brad Guth published pictures of his Venus find. He had blown up
satellite pictures to the point that a city road or bridge appeared.
While blurry -- because of extreme magnification -- it clearly shows a
straight line with spikes and even intervals and has strong symmetry.
Actually that Venusian bridge is quite an interesting item but it's not
hardly representing the most interesting configuration of such hot
rocks, whereas we seem to have a fairly nifty and somewhat complex
tarmac, as well as for having a nearby township or campus site that's
absolutely chuck full of those extremely large and interesting
structures that otherwise seem as though entirely out of place.
However, there is a nearby 'fluid arch' item that's massive and yet
looks perfectly natural.

That's right! It's SHOW and TELL guys. Brad and I want to know what
YOUR CREDENTIALS are! Do you know what credentials are? Probably not.
KOOK CITY doesn't print any.
Besides their CREDENTIALS being entirely in question, nor do most any
of their Usenet names associate with any real person, and their
infomercial-science that's based almost entirely upon using as much
wag-thy-dog and disinformation-R-us while using whatever conditional
laws of physics, and having excluded all evidence that's suggesting
otherwise as they can possibly get away with, simply doesn't
independently replicate worth a hoot, much less jive with other remote
science that has become available since the NASA/Apollo era. Even "tj
Frazir" that generally replies only within the Usenet sci.physics realm
has always had somewhat difficult words to say, from which I've
decrypted as to indicate that he too has been convinced via other
existing science that we've all been snookered by those having "the
right stuff", not to mention as of recently by our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush).

The contributions by such disinformation Usenet e-spooks as "Secret237"
are only further proof-positive that I'm right, whereas they've had
decades to prove upon whatever our NASA/Apollo wizards accomplished, of
which they have not proven squat, as well as they've had the last 6+
years to prove that the image of a township and/or complex community of
rational infrastructure that's on Venus doesn't exist, and thus far
they haven't accomplished squat, much less having contributed to the
best available science that can be replicated and otherwise deductively
supported until better science proves otherwise. What's nonexistant
are the CREDENTIALS of "Secret237", as well as the total lack of seeing
any supportive science that's on their side of a given argument.
Secret237 is a paid for e-spook of Usenet, a damage-control mole that's
every bit as brown-nosed and as incest cloned as you can possibly get.

Obviously if I were so entirely dead wrong, as so frequently stipulated
by the likes of "Secret237", as such they wouldn't so much as bother
with their topic/author stalking and orchestrated efforts at
accomplishing such topic/author bashings and banishment, as there are
countless other's having posted similar if not more interesting
information or worthy ideas as their weird Usenet of science and
research topics that have yet to have been stalked and bashed by the
likes of "Secret237". Apparently my topics and their persistence is
what further proves that I've hit more than my fair share of nails on
the head, as why otherwise bother with terminating us supposed village
idiots.

For some odd or perhaps pesky reason, a few of my recent topic updates
that specifically relate to defending myself, or to that of discussing
Venus or the moon are being taken in by this Usenet that sucks and
blows, but otherwise their context subsequently having vanished almost
as though they were Usama bin Laden or WMD, whereas it's becoming as
though I'm being moderated into banishment from further contributing on
those topics. So, before using other methods at my disposal, I'll try
posting the following context once again.

The yaysay verses naysay arguments as to the LSE-CM/ISS is still of
what's going to transpire with or without our help. There's no good
reason(s) (at least not technical) as to why China or even ESA has to
follow our infomercial-science rules. At some point the ESA Venus
EXPRESS team is going to have their new and improved science to share
as to the cooling geothermal nature of Venus, and perhaps of other
missions to come that'll likely include extended missions of rigid
airships operating efficiently under those thick clouds of Venus, that
will subsequently reveal the truth about other intelligent life having
existed/coexisted, as will as their efforts accomplishing the first
fully AI/robotic missions to the physically dark and nasty surface of
our moon that'll start telling us the naked truth.

It's not hardly fair that the yaysay crowd as for having been
sequestered and restricted upon using their deductive reasoning, as per
our having been limited to the regular laws of physics, of replicated
hard-science and of allowing most all other forms of evidence to share
and share alike is having to contend with the sort of free-for-all and
flak tossing naysay collective gauntlet that's often based upon those
highly conditional laws of physics, as well as on their remote or
soft-science that's most often of spendy infomercial-science that's not
easily if at all replicated, and otherwise of their continually having
excluded upon most all other forms of boat rocking evidence.

Under such a profound naysay mindset of conditions is obviously why the
facts and thus the truth can become anything you'd care to make of
them. No wonder their naysay view and/or glued stance upon most
anything that's being contested is so often skewed, so easily distorted
if not such opposing evidence as having become banished or via
nondisclosure eliminated from the given argument.

I don't want to sound as though I've discovered something entirely new
about government, religion or about the highly protected realms of
physics and of their precious science that's about as coveted as such
cultism ever tends to get, whereas throughout history we've all seen
their lies upon lies and eventually we've seen the cover-thy-butt
results of their wag-thy-dog plus subsequent infomercials of their
damage control, if not in the form of their having created wars and/or
the perpetrated threat of such wars.

What do we think would happen differently if other than having our
NASA, NOVA and GOOGLE in the very same boat?

Is infomercial-science as good as it gets, and are the highly
conditional laws of physics that'll make any form of science into
whatever's being bought and paid for into the one and only form of
truth there is?

To what extent must we village idiots become assimilated before we'll
let go of our own individual deductive reasoning?

Putting those three rusemasters together onboard the very same good
ship LOLLIPOP is much like our DHS becoming their all-knowing
disinformation mothership or fleet master that's encharge of all the
other boats that seem to entirely fill their mainstream status quo
cesspool with whatever they alone interpret as being the truth or that
of any importance.

Science as well as religion and government can just as easily push a
given discovery to the front page, or it can just as easily
topic/author stalk and banish such no matters what the truth or
consequences, from ever seeing the light of day. Every such cult is
having to operate exactly like the Third Reich, keeping itself as WMD
stealth as they can, while using every trick in their koran or any
other black book in order to justify and/or to exclude upon whatever's
capable of rocking their status quo boat. The mainstream of science as
well as government and certainly of religion has literally accomplished
a bloody fleet of such boats to protect, along with a few of such as
having become specialized boats that have been specifically configured
for hauling loads of ulterior motives and hidden agendas as their WMD
form of spendy infomercials and/or as having those MIB that are
perfectly capable of orchestrating diversions that'll emerge as need
be, and then summarily vanishing into the nearest shadow or of the
space-toilet they originally emerged from.

Omission of evidence is actually fairly common place in government,
religion and per most any other group of powerful individuals that
obviously intend to survive in spite of themselves. It's called global
domination, except without rules of fair play nor a stitch of remorse
(aka Hitler like). Our own resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) has
actually been quite good at the game of life via domination, that is
relatively safe as long as you're not another unfortunate innocent
Muslim that's caught sitting on an oily rock.

The typical counter/naysay argument as given by way of Usenet
rusemaster "jowr" and of his/her statements of "It is impossible, you
have no proof" and "I refuse to discuss your argument" is actually
providing all the proof we honest folks need (please read the above).
In fact, it also proves that "jowr" is clearly one of THEM, or perhaps
of something far worse. The status quo insistence that "We did it.
Multiple times. We left crap up there that we can interact with from
here, and we brought stuff back." remains as 100% infomercial based,
and yet only further proves as to how snookered and thus easily
dumbfounded you folks really are, exactly as I too was as of nearly
seven years ago. Unfortunately, these folks obviously still have no
such fly-by-rocket-lander, they have no such Kodak moments from the
lunar surface, nor have they anything as having been humanly or even
robotically recovered from our gamma/hard-X-ray moon that's otherwise
offering an extremely dark and nasty terrain as per anything you and I
can possibly imagine.
-
Brad Guth

tomcat wrote:

Brad Guth published pictures of his Venus find. He had blown up
satellite pictures to the point that a city road or bridge appeared.
While blurry -- because of extreme magnification -- it clearly shows a
straight line with spikes and even intervals and has strong symmetry.
That is about as good as it gets when it comes to satellite photo
interpretation.



Those were radar images of Venus from Magellan BTW, not photos.
Here's hidden NASA evidence of life on the Moon:
http://www.stuffucanuse.com/fake_moo...n_landings.htm

Those were radar images of Venus from Magellan BTW, not photos.
Here's hidden NASA evidence of life on the Moon:
http://www.stuffucanuse.com/fake_moo...n_landings.htm
Usenet wizard Pat Flannery's credentials are every bit as equally
hocus-pocus and/or bogus and otherwise illusive as Usama bin Laden
and/or remaining as stealth as all of those WMD, thus not at all unlike
the Skull and Bones credentials of his perverted and favorite
bed-wetting sex partner "Art Deco".

The per usual topic/author ****ology as derived from our warm and fuzzy
"Pat Flannery" and "Art Deco", plus from all sorts of their mutual
incest cloned partners in crimes against humanity, is exactly what it
is. Notice how their supposed credentials don't even exist because
such e-spooks don't actually exist as actual humans.

Instead we honest folks get to deal with each of their Third Reich, or
else mindset. I'm to guess this is the absolute very best we can ever
expect from such a Third Reich collaborating collective of such Jews,
and like all the others trying to perform their brown-nosed minion
duties as infomercial-history, infomercial-science and subsequent
damage-control rusemasters on behalf of continually wiping their pagan
god's butt with each of their long and very status quo suck-up brown
noses.
-
Brad Guth

"tomcat" wrote in message
oups.com...
The Internet Usenet is NOT an 'authority based' medium. It is a
'blind' medium of communication. IT IS NOT PROPER TO ASK FOR
CREDENTIALS!

The hell it's not proper! When someone claims to have a masters degree it
IS proper to ask where that degree was granted. Especially when it's so
obvious that they've never seen the inside of a university classroom. Or
when he says he had to take "a quiz" to get that degree. A masters degree
usually takes more than a quiz. You clowns ever hear of a thesis? How do
you think Brad would respond when asked to defend his thesis? Would he call
the review board naysaying LLPOF NASA/NSA incest cloned borgs?

So SkeptiKooks, bug off. Stop asking stupid questions. Stop
harrassing genuine posters. Stop posting your 4 letter word crap. AND
STOP ASKING FOR CREDENTIALS, unless you can SHOW and PROVE your own
credentials.

That's right! It's SHOW and TELL guys. Brad and I want to know what
YOUR CREDENTIALS are! Do you know what credentials are? Probably not.
KOOK CITY doesn't print any.

My credentials don't enter into the question of Brad's qualifications to
interpret photographs. Do I need to be a doctor of medicine to ask if a
physician has a degree and a license? Or do I just need enough common sense
to know that some people lie? Tomcat, if you believe that usenet should be
a blind medium of communication, would you accept medical advice from anyone
who posts their ramblings on a news group, or would you ask if they were
qualified to make their claims before you took the snake oil they
recommended?

So when I start claiming that the latest Hubble Space Telescope pictures
show an intergalactic turnpike, I'll be glad to post my credentials. But as
long as Brad claims he holds a degree I'll continue to ask where he got it.

How about it Brad, did you really get a masters degree or did you make it
up? The answer is simple Brad, it's either "Yes I have a real degree" or "I
made it up."

Dave