|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter double transit 3/20/04
Anyone here in the U.S. catch the simultaneous transits of Ganymede
and Io across Jupiter last night, around 10:30 PM to midnight CST or so? We observed them using my friend's 12" LX-200. Ganymede and its shadow were transiting over the NTrZ, just north of the NEB. I was surprised at how easy it was to see Ganymede, visible as a grayish indistinct dot over the white zone. Io and its shadow transited over the southern edge of the NEB. I figured that this would make Io easy to spot, but it was actually more difficult than Ganymede, probably due to its smaller size. It was visible as a tiny white "hole punch" in the NEB, immediately preceding its shadow. While observing, we remarked on how the distance between Ganymede and its shadow really made the sun's angle of illumination (with respect to our line of sight) evident. It seems strange to me that Jupiter's gibbous phase never gets smaller than 97% or so (it was barely visible last night), yet the effect of the indirect illumination is so much more dramatic on the moons and their shadows. Anyone have an explanation for this? Cheers, Ritesh |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter double transit 3/20/04
In article , Axel
wrote: Anyone here in the U.S. catch the simultaneous transits of Ganymede and Io across Jupiter last night, around 10:30 PM to midnight CST or so? We observed them using my friend's 12" LX-200. Ganymede and its shadow were transiting over the NTrZ, just north of the NEB. I was surprised at how easy it was to see Ganymede, visible as a grayish indistinct dot over the white zone. Io and its shadow transited over the southern edge of the NEB. I figured that this would make Io easy to spot, but it was actually more difficult than Ganymede, probably due to its smaller size. It was visible as a tiny white "hole punch" in the NEB, immediately preceding its shadow. While observing, we remarked on how the distance between Ganymede and its shadow really made the sun's angle of illumination (with respect to our line of sight) evident. It seems strange to me that Jupiter's gibbous phase never gets smaller than 97% or so (it was barely visible last night), yet the effect of the indirect illumination is so much more dramatic on the moons and their shadows. Anyone have an explanation for this? Cheers, Ritesh I noticed that too. Also the emergence of Europa from Jupiter's shadow also reinforced the off angle for the sun relative to us. I also photographed 3 hours of it and am now processing the 40 gigabytes of collected video data. Ganymede is easily visible as a grayish disk on the footage and like you observed, Io was just a "hole" on the darkish brown belt. Milton Aupperle http://www.outcastsoft.com/AstroImages/AstroIndex.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter double transit 3/20/04
This depiction is by no means an explanation, but it begins to show how the
larger distance of Ganymede enters the equation. http://www.psiaz.com/polakis/jupiter_shadow_cones.jpg That's neat! Thx. Ritesh |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jupiter Events ( 3 Jan - 9 Jan ) | Brendan DJ Murphy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 1st 04 06:54 PM |
Jupiter Events ( December 2003 ) | Brendan DJ Murphy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 30th 03 01:39 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |