A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

10% of PNN patent for sale



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 18th 20, 01:38 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale



10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm
  #2  
Old February 18th 20, 04:43 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.
  #3  
Old February 18th 20, 09:18 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am, wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.



There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5









  #4  
Old February 18th 20, 12:28 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am,
wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.



There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5


And the relevance of that is?

Sylvia.
  #5  
Old February 18th 20, 01:14 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am,
wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.



There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5


And the relevance of that is?



you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ?



Sylvia.


  #6  
Old February 18th 20, 02:16 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am,
wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.


There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5


And the relevance of that is?



you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ?

No.

  #7  
Old February 18th 20, 05:23 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am,
wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.


There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5


And the relevance of that is?



you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ?

No.



“to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“

from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/
  #8  
Old February 19th 20, 02:41 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

On 19/02/2020 3:23 am, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am,
wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.


There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5


And the relevance of that is?


you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ?

No.



“to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“

from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/


I really cannot follow your line of thought.

Is it that since other people have scammed, that makes scamming OK?

Or that the fact that other such proposals have been scams, this must
not be a scam?

Perhaps it's that because a better propulsion system is desirable (which
I don't dispute), anything that proposes one is necessarily real.

Sylvia.
  #9  
Old February 19th 20, 09:27 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

Il giorno mercoledì 19 febbraio 2020 02:41:18 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 19/02/2020 3:23 am, wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am,
wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.


There are those who live by cheating billions for 50 years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5


And the relevance of that is?


you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two measures" ?

No.



“to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“

from https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/


I really cannot follow your line of thought.

Is it that since other people have scammed, that makes scamming OK?

Or that the fact that other such proposals have been scams, this must
not be a scam?

Perhaps it's that because a better propulsion system is desirable (which
I don't dispute), anything that proposes one is necessarily real.

Sylvia.



The scams are decided on the merits of the facts.
I say that a reaction mass ejection propulsion system (rockets) that in 50 years has failed to place a human outpost on the moon and that loses more than 99% of the mass going and returning to the Moon (Apollo 11) is, although it got there! A fraud. A scam is to hope that an evolution is possible with a miracle is a scam. And the disastrous history of the Shuttle taught nothing.

We come to PNN because you are talking about the scandal of asking for funds for your patent and development. Have you understood that in www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm the three physicists Moretti, Fabri and Pastore say that the principle of action and reaction is violable in electrodynamics? No you didn't understand it and they cheat too.

Also in that link, did you understand that a patent of mine filed in 1998 was granted in 2000? And that the patent said how to violate Newton's third? No ! No you did not understand it: even those of the Italian patent office were participating in the PNN scam!
Did you understand that 2 Japanese people copied (bad) months after in 1998 the filing of my patent, the basic idea of the same and they republished it in their name? No you didn't understand!
Now I'm going to patent the PNN more enhanced than in this video http://www..asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4
However, I will patent whether or not I find funding.
The F432 patent will be copied at the speed of light because the real and not bogus conquest of space will go. I will annoy you as long as you at least recognize that the only functioning reactionless drive (the Emdrive does not work!) is PNN and can take the money from the nobel prize.
I hope it is not a scam for you to receive (perhaps!) the nobel prize too, and of course ridicule and punish people like you who have always hindered me.

I repeat again: The scams are decided on the merits of the facts

E.Laureti


  #10  
Old February 20th 20, 06:13 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 10% of PNN patent for sale

On 19/02/2020 7:27 pm, wrote:
Il giorno mercoledì 19 febbraio 2020 02:41:18 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha
scritto:
On 19/02/2020 3:23 am,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 14:16:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha
scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:14 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 12:28:05 UTC+1, Sylvia
Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 7:18 pm,
wrote:
Il giorno martedì 18 febbraio 2020 04:43:37 UTC+1, Sylvia
Else ha scritto:
On 18/02/2020 11:38 am,
wrote:


10% of the patent of the PNN F432 (reactionless
drive) prototype for sale

http://www.asps.it/patportions.htm


This has scam written all over it.

Sylvia.


There are those who live by cheating billions for 50
years with human bases on the Moon and Mars

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha.../#7f0dc0022af5




And the relevance of that is?


you understand the meaning of the motto "two weights two
measures" ?

No.


“to operate/use/adopt/have double standards“

from
https://www.parolaio.it/dizionario-i...si-due-misure/




I really cannot follow your line of thought.

Is it that since other people have scammed, that makes scamming
OK?

Or that the fact that other such proposals have been scams, this
must not be a scam?

Perhaps it's that because a better propulsion system is desirable
(which I don't dispute), anything that proposes one is necessarily
real.

Sylvia.



The scams are decided on the merits of the facts. I say that a
reaction mass ejection propulsion system (rockets) that in 50 years
has failed to place a human outpost on the moon and that loses more
than 99% of the mass going and returning to the Moon (Apollo 11) is,
although it got there! A fraud. A scam is to hope that an evolution
is possible with a miracle is a scam. And the disastrous history of
the Shuttle taught nothing.


Rockets have limitations. That doesn't make them a fraud or a scam. They
do at least work.


We come to PNN because you are talking about the scandal of asking
for funds for your patent and development. Have you understood that
in www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm the three physicists Moretti, Fabri
and Pastore say that the principle of action and reaction is violable
in electrodynamics? No you didn't understand it and they cheat too.

Also in that link, did you understand that a patent of mine filed in
1998 was granted in 2000? And that the patent said how to violate
Newton's third? No ! No you did not understand it: even those of the
Italian patent office were participating in the PNN scam!


The Italian patent office may have failed to grasp the significance of
what your patent was claiming. That doesn't mean they will similarly
fail next time, and it certainly does not suggest they were
participating in a scam.


Did you
understand that 2 Japanese people copied (bad) months after in 1998
the filing of my patent, the basic idea of the same and they
republished it in their name?


So scammers can also be plagerists. Quelle surprise.

No you didn't understand! Now I'm going
to patent the PNN more enhanced than in this video
http://www.asps.it/qct05_ENG.mp4 However, I will patent whether or
not I find funding.


You don't know that you will succeed in getting the patent.

The F432 patent will be copied at the speed of
light because the real and not bogus conquest of space will go. I
will annoy you as long as you at least recognize that the only
functioning reactionless drive (the Emdrive does not work!) is PNN
and can take the money from the nobel prize. I hope it is not a scam
for you to receive (perhaps!) the nobel prize too, and of course
ridicule and punish people like you who have always hindered me.

I repeat again: The scams are decided on the merits of the facts

E.Laureti


Why not allow device, and the experimental demonstration that it works,
to be examined by scientists of impeccable credentials, under a
non-disclosure agreement that does, however, allow them to say whether
or not they think the effect is real?

Sylvia.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to get a Patent Jim[_26_] Misc 0 January 23rd 11 03:56 PM
Bigelow patent Allen Thomson Policy 36 August 27th 06 06:48 AM
Wooo! Patent Scott Lowther Policy 4 December 2nd 03 08:39 AM
Woo hoo! New patent ... Scott Lowther Space Shuttle 4 July 3rd 03 06:09 PM
Woo hoo! New patent ... Scott Lowther Policy 4 July 3rd 03 06:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.