alt.astronomy, alt.sci.physics, alt.religion.christianity, rec.arts.sf.written

Why shouldn't there be at least more than 1 telescope search-
ing for asteroids, as well as earth-like planets around a G2V
sun like our own?

Spitzer space telescope will not completely shut down,
but here's the conspiracy: the liquid helium used to
cool the telescope down to reduce the fog that dims
the glow of stars will fade, unless the telescope
becomes "servicable", which it won't. So by all
intents and purposes, Spitzer will NO LONGER be
useful for finding those precious G2V metal-like planets,
because the progressives want it "their way" - the
"stupid way". It seems sinister to have to wait for con-
tinued, dumbing down of industries back to the post-
WWII era, but since that is exactly where the center of
the 'baby boom' lies, is it no surprise that children just
want to copy what their parents have been doing?

As covered earlier, the James Webb telescope has also
conspicuously morphed into a political scam of sorts:
The conspiratorial spin became, that all of the "exces-
ses of the American intellectuals in the fields of Physics,
Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology have now
exceeded all tolerable limits", which amounts to a mal-
framing against those like our own selves, many of whom
have been creating some extremely intelligent posts,
that with the proper infusion of capital, offers a payback
of nearly 1000-fold, as well as continuing to spearhead
the movement to orbit and beyond.

Anything less intentional than using the tools of industry
in order to create a much greater job base than we already
have, seems to focus on creating more government, and
more non-existant industrial job-bases, while mainstream
media always seems to 'go along to get along' with a pro-
gressively malframed spin, that it is certain intellectuals of
mal-intent, who are not using the telescope for the progres-
sive's best purpose. IMO, it should have been used for what
the initial excitement was all about: finding earth-like planets
by the thousands. Instead, it has become a boondoggle of
sorts by stating the following spin on its website: "Webb
will find the first galaxies that formed in the early Universe,
connecting the Big Bang to our own Milky Way Galaxy."

The reward for keeping these telescopes alive (Spitzer,
Webb), would not only serve to expand our industrial base
at home, but provide the necessary infrastructure for expan-
ding human civilization towards the local G2V 'neighborhood'.
Here is a 25 parsec G2V starchart:

Star# /RA hms/Dec 0/Spectr type/Dist LY/RV(km/sec)/U/V/W

9012 / 0 20 18 / -12 29.2 / G2V / - / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
67 / 1 38 44 / +42 21.8 / G2V / 66.4 / -6.8 / -35 / -15 / 4
136 / 3 16 41 / -62 46.0 / G2V / 36.6 / +12.1 / -65 / -44 / 14
243 / 6 42 52 / -27 17.6 / G2V / 53.4 / -14.7 / -12 / 22 / 12
368 / 9 45 22 / +46 15.3 / G2V / 49.3 / +5.2 / 9 / -5 / 15
376 / 9 58 08 /+32 10.2 / G2V / 60.3 / +56.0 / -61 / -53 / 15
9346 / 11 05 32 / -29 54.1 / G2V / 67.8 / +11.2 / -36 / -21 / -26
9434 / 13 11 34 / +56 58.4 / G2V / 65.1 / -8.8 / 12 / 0 / -7
582 / 15 18 25 / -48 08.1 / G2V / 50.1 / -69.8 / -123 / -52 / 24
9537 / 15 59 08 / +33 27.2 / G2V / 77.5 / +18.4 / 72 / -52 / 24
9589 / 17 15 40 / -17.5 17.7 / G2V / 70.8 / +58.9 / 15 / -105 / 51
776 / 20 00 34 / -67 27.2 / G2V / 62.6 / -12.2 / -77 / -34 / -53
9777 / 22 14 45 / +12 38.8 / G2V / 77.5 / -29.9 / -90 / -35 / -29

The box orbit parameters (~w,e,i) are also available in astro-
nomical databases.