|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FOREVER SPECIAL RELATIVITY
In order to camouflage the falsehood of Einstein's light postulate
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ : "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body" Einsteinians would do anything. They have already created Doubly Special Relativity, Deformed Special Relativity, Very Special Relativity etc.: http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0406/0406104.pdf "THE CONSTANCY, OR OTHERWISE, OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT" Daniel J. Farrell, J. Dunning-Davies, Department of Physics, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England. "Since the Special Theory of Relativity was expounded and accepted, it has seemed almost Tantamount to sacrilege to even suggest that the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper of 1911 [1] that the speed of light might vary with the gravitational potential. Interestingly, this suggestion that gravity might affect the motion of light also surfaced in Michell's paper of 1784 [2], where he first derived the expression for the ratio of the mass to the radius of a star whose escape speed equalled the speed of light......In the 'VSL epoch', so called 'Lorentz invariance is spontaneously broken'; meaning that the Lorentz transformatins, or more specifically Einstein's second postulate : 'The speed of light c is the same constant with respect to all observers irrespective of their motion and the motion of the source' no longer applies.... Moreover, photons of low energy travel at 'c' while photons above a threshhold energy can have varying values, faster than 'c', which are proportional to their energy..... Doubly Special Relativity also provides a 'natural' mechanism for the speed of light to be faster in the very early universe, as the average energy per particle would have been well over the threshold value." http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=...pt=sci_arttext "PHYSICS OF DEFORMED SPECIAL RELATIVITY: RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE REVISITED" Florian Girelli; Etera R. Livine, Perimeter Institute, 31 Caroline Street North Waterloo, Ontario canada N2L 2Y5 "Varying speed of light: DSR is a well-known example of varying Speed of Light [13]. The simple argument is that masses should slow down the motion of light, and stop it in the extreme case when we reach the maximal mass (black hole case)." http://www.newscientist.com/channel/...to-a-spin.html "It's not every day that respectable scientists challenge Einstein. But that's what Nobel prizewinner Sheldon Glashow and his colleague Andrew Cohen, both of Boston University in Massachusetts, have dared to do. They believe it is time to rewrite the rules of Einstein's special theory of relativity, our best description of the nature of space and time for over a century. They call their theory very special relativity, or VSR." However neither Doubly Special Relativity nor Deformed Special Relativity nor Very Special Relativity etc. is radical enough. The enormous danger is still actual - even zombies may find it suitable to ask one day: "Do Doubly Special Relativity, Deformed Special Relativity, Very Special Relativity etc. imply that the speed of light is NOT independent of the state of motion of the emitting body?". And the tragedy would be complete. Three distinguished hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult, Professor Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond, Professor Tom Roberts and Professor Jong-Ping Hsu, have resolved the problem forever, and the name of their discovery is, accordingly, Forever Special Relativity. Professor Jean- Marc Levy-Leblond, Professor Tom Roberts and Professor Jong-Ping Hsu discovered that Einstein's light postulate is just redundant. The speed of light may be constant, variable, may depend on the state of motion of the emitting body, may be independent of the state of motion of the emitting body etc. etc.: in any event, SPECIAL RELATIVITY WOULD BE UNAFFECTED. More about the discovery of Leblond-Roberts-Hsu (Forever Special Relativity) he http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...4b543c9ed073e? Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
FOREVER SPECIAL RELATIVITY
From Osher Doctorow
Quite a few physicists and engineers have made their careers out of postulating finite upper and lower limits to physical variables. The biggest problem with such postulates, which by the way would correspond in some ways to the Ancient Athenians claiming that only 0- curvature (Euclidean) space is possible, is that there is no way of distinguishing the "unpermitted region" from a different phase, although almost equally important is the fact that Inflation of the Universe is both logically a different phase (dynamic or expanding geometry can be regarded as a different physical phase) and theoretically very compelling. The "lower bound" people are about as bad as the "upper bound" people. The most common description of the justification for regarding space and time as quantized is that "at or below the Planck level, geometry is meaningless." As with the superluminal opponents, nobody has actually gone at or below the Planck level, and nobody actually can explain what would happen if you kept miniaturizing objects. Is there some level at which, when you measured the length of a line segment as 4 on some scale, then you couldn't cut it in half and get 2, or so to speak that 2 + 2 is not 4? If this were true, then not only mathematics but measurement would be contradicted. But with a straight face such people would tell us that there is some level at which, without entering a different phase, you could no longer measure a line or subdivide it, even though at a slightly higher scale or level you just did measure a line or subdivided it. If you keep persisting with these people, then they will ultimately claim that it is "beyond argument", or that "the mathematics says so," which is an admission that neither logic nor experiment supports them. Osher Doctorow |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FOREVER SPECIAL RELATIVITY
In order to camouflage the falsehood of Einstein's light postulate
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/: "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body" Einsteinians would do anything. They have already created Doubly Special Relativity, Deformed Special Relativity, Very Special Relativity etc.: http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0406/0406104.pdf "THE CONSTANCY, OR OTHERWISE, OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT" Daniel J. Farrell, J. Dunning-Davies, Department of Physics, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England. "Since the Special Theory of Relativity was expounded and accepted, it has seemed almost Tantamount to sacrilege to even suggest that the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper of 1911 [1] that the speed of light might vary with the gravitational potential. Interestingly, this suggestion that gravity might affect the motion of light also surfaced in Michell's paper of 1784 [2], where he first derived the expression for the ratio of the mass to the radius of a star whose escape speed equalled the speed of light......In the 'VSL epoch', so called 'Lorentz invariance is spontaneously broken'; meaning that the Lorentz transformatins, or more specifically Einstein's second postulate : 'The speed of light c is the same constant with respect to all observers irrespective of their motion and the motion of the source' no longer applies.... Moreover, photons of low energy travel at 'c' while photons above a threshhold energy can have varying values, faster than 'c', which are proportional to their energy..... Doubly Special Relativity also provides a 'natural' mechanism for the speed of light to be faster in the very early universe, as the average energy per particle would have been well over the threshold value." http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=...pt=sci_arttext "PHYSICS OF DEFORMED SPECIAL RELATIVITY: RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE REVISITED" Florian Girelli; Etera R. Livine, Perimeter Institute, 31 Caroline Street North Waterloo, Ontario canada N2L 2Y5 "Varying speed of light: DSR is a well-known example of varying Speed of Light [13]. The simple argument is that masses should slow down the motion of light, and stop it in the extreme case when we reach the maximal mass (black hole case)." http://www.newscientist.com/channel/...to-a-spin.html "It's not every day that respectable scientists challenge Einstein. But that's what Nobel prizewinner Sheldon Glashow and his colleague Andrew Cohen, both of Boston University in Massachusetts, have dared to do. They believe it is time to rewrite the rules of Einstein's special theory of relativity, our best description of the nature of space and time for over a century. They call their theory very special relativity, or VSR." However neither Doubly Special Relativity nor Deformed Special Relativity nor Very Special Relativity etc. is radical enough. The enormous danger is still actual - even zombies may find it suitable to ask one day: "Do Doubly Special Relativity, Deformed Special Relativity, Very Special Relativity etc. imply that the speed of light is NOT independent of the state of motion of the emitting body?". And the tragedy would be complete. Three distinguished hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult, Professor Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond, Professor Tom Roberts and Professor Jong-Ping Hsu, have resolved the problem forever, and the name of their discovery is, accordingly, Forever Special Relativity. Professor Jean- Marc Levy-Leblond, Professor Tom Roberts and Professor Jong-Ping Hsu discovered that Einstein's light postulate is just redundant. The speed of light may be constant, variable, may depend on the state of motion of the emitting body, may be independent of the state of motion of the emitting body etc. etc.: in any event, SPECIAL RELATIVITY WOULD BE UNAFFECTED. More about the discovery of Leblond-Roberts-Hsu (Forever Special Relativity) he http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...4b543c9ed073e? The French genius Jean Eisenstaedt is also developping Forever Special Relativity but his approach is somewhat different. Again, the theory is unaffected, Einstein is the divine author, only Einstein's false light postulate is replaced by its true alternative implied by Newton's particle model of light: http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/...40/pgs/4_5.pdf "Il n'y a alors aucune raison theorique a ce que la vitesse de la lumiere ne depende pas de la vitesse de sa source ainsi que de celle de l'observateur terrestre ; plus clairement encore, il n'y a pas de raison, dans le cadre de la logique des Principia de Newton, pour que la lumiere se comporte autrement - quant a sa trajectoire - qu'une particule materielle. Il n'y a pas non plus de raison pour que la lumiere ne soit pas sensible a la gravitation. Bref, pourquoi ne pas appliquer a la lumiere toute la theorie newtonienne ? C'est en fait ce que font plusieurs astronomes, opticiens, philosophes de la nature a la fin du XVIIIeme siecle. Les resultats sont etonnants... et aujourd'hui nouveaux." Translation from French: "Therefore there is no theoretical reason why the speed of light should not depend on the speed of the source and the speed of the terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly, there is no reason, in the framework of the logic of Newton's Principia, why light should behave, as far as its trajectory is concerned, differently from a material particle. Neither is there any reason why light should not be sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why don't we apply the whole Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is what many astronomers, opticians, philosophers of nature did by the end of 18th century. The results are surprising....and new nowadays." Pentcho Valev |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
FOREVER SPECIAL RELATIVITY
Paul Davies establishes Forever Special Relativity by using an
extremely original approach: http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538 Paul Davies: "The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the speed of light might not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?" Initially people do feel shock and horror (after all, Paul Davies is a great time traveller) and wait but no Great Revolution in Science comes from around the corner. Then people go and see and find there is no Great Revolution in Science around the corner. Just "a few maverick scientists" taking away the money they have been given for finding a solution to the fundamental problem: "How can Einstein's light postulate be violated without violating it?". Finally, people decide to pay no attention to any "maverick scientists" who claim Einstein's light postulate is false. So Special Relativity becomes Forever Special relativity. Pentcho Valev |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
FOREVER SPECIAL RELATIVITY
On Sep 4, 10:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Paul Davies establishes Forever Special Relativity by using an extremely original approach: http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538 Paul Davies: "The "c" here stands for the speed oflight. It is one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the speed oflightmight not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?" Initially people do feel shock and horror (after all, Paul Davies is a great time traveller) and wait but no Great Revolution in Science comes from around the corner. Then people go and see and find there is no Great Revolution in Science around the corner. Just "a few maverick scientists" taking away the money they have been given for finding a solution to the fundamental problem: "How can Einstein's light postulate be violated without violating it?". Finally, people decide to pay no attention to any "maverick scientists" who claim Einstein's light postulate is false. So Special Relativity becomes Forever Special relativity. More from a hypnotist in Einstein criminal cult who, together with John Stachel, seems to be the original discoverer of Forever Special Relativity (that is, a Special Relativity independent of the falsehood of Einstein's second (light) postulate): http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/onemorederivation.pdf Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "This is the point of view from wich I intend to criticize the overemphasized role of the speed of light in the foundations of the special relativity, and to propose an approach to these foundations that dispenses with the hypothesis of the invariance of c....We believe that special relativity at the present time stands as a universal theory discribing the structure of a common space-time arena in which all fundamental processes take place....The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity." The last statement will be referred to some day as THE MOST INCREDIBLE OXYMORON ever produced in Einstein's era so it makes sense to show it once mo JEAN-MARC LEVY-LEBLOND: "The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity." Pentcho Valev |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FOREVER SPECIAL RELATIVITY
On Sep 22, 11:53 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On Sep 4, 10:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote: Paul Davies establishes Forever Special Relativity by using an extremely original approach: http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538 Paul Davies: "The "c" here stands for the speed oflight. It is one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the speed oflightmight not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?" Initially people do feel shock and horror (after all, Paul Davies is a great time traveller) and wait but no Great Revolution in Science comes from around the corner. Then people go and see and find there is no Great Revolution in Science around the corner. Just "a few maverick scientists" taking away the money they have been given for finding a solution to the fundamental problem: "How can Einstein's light postulate be violated without violating it?". Finally, people decide to pay no attention to any "maverick scientists" who claim Einstein's light postulate is false. So Special Relativity becomes Forever Special relativity. More from a hypnotist in Einstein criminal cult who, together with John Stachel, seems to be the original discoverer of Forever Special Relativity (that is, a Special Relativity independent of the falsehood of Einstein's second (light) postulate): http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/onemorederivation.pdf Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "This is the point of view from wich I intend to criticize the overemphasized role of the speed of light in the foundations of the special relativity, and to propose an approach to these foundations that dispenses with the hypothesis of the invariance of c....We believe that special relativity at the present time stands as a universal theory discribing the structure of a common space-time arena in which all fundamental processes take place....The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity." The last statement will be referred to some day as THE MOST INCREDIBLE OXYMORON ever produced in Einstein's era so it makes sense to show it once mo JEAN-MARC LEVY-LEBLOND: "The evidence of the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity." Jong-Ping Hsu is also one of the original discoverers of Forever Special Relativity: http://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Rela.../dp/9810238886 "...an unexpected affirmative answer to the long-standing question of whether it is possible to construct a relativity theory without postulating the constancy of the speed of light and retaining only the first postulate of special relativity. This question was discussed in the early years following the discovery of special relativity by many physicists, including Ritz, Tolman, Kunz, Comstock and Pauli, all of whom obtained negative answers." Andreas Ernst, University of Heidelberg, Germany, who is a reviewer of Hsu's book, explains where Hsu's approach leads to: http://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Rela.../dp/9810238886 "Hsu's theory is shown to have new implications for modern physics which differ from those found in Special Relativity: A very interesting special case called 'Common Relativity' is considered which is based on the postulate of a common time instead of a constant speed of light within the four-dimensional symmetry framework." Bravo Hsu! Common time instead of a constant speed of light! Hsu is a genius! He is a greater genius than his brothers discoverers John Stachel and Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond. Much greater! Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SPECIAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT THE LIGHT POSTULATE | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | June 25th 07 12:44 PM |
RELATIVITY - The Special, the General, and the Causal Theory | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 1 | March 9th 07 08:16 PM |
RELATIVITY - The Special, the General, and the Causal Theory | Bill Sheppard | Misc | 4 | March 8th 07 10:02 AM |
RELATIVITY - The Special, the General, and the Causal Theory | Bill Sheppard | Misc | 0 | March 7th 07 04:43 PM |
On basic formalism of special theory of relativity | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | October 28th 05 09:21 AM |