|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
In a robot story of Asimov, the first Jump was done over a distance of
0,3 MPc. The ship had distance indicator showing distance from Earth between 0 to 1 MPc. Assume that you know you have Jumped to somewhere less than 1 MPc distant, but do NOT have any indicator how far or in which direction. How do you find your way within the local group of galaxies? There are 2 giant spirals - Milky Way and Andromeda. If you are somewhere within the disc of Andromeda, which clues would you have that you are not in a distant part of the disc of our own Milky Way? A difference between Milky Way and Andromeda is said to be fewer young stars in Andromeda - ratio of young stars to old is about 1/5 to 1/10 that of Milky Way. Now looking around deep sky... Milky Way should be a naked eye object in Andromeda, but even dimmer than Andromeda from Milky Way (which is not bright to begin with). Andromeda is at Milky Way galactic latitude of about 20. Andromeda is itself oblique to line of sight... what is the angle between Andromeda disc and direction to Milky Way? Then there are the satellites. Where are the satellites of Andromeda looking from Andromeda, and how bright are they? And where is Triangulum? It is closer to Andromeda than Milky Way (how close?) - where is it looking from Andromeda, and how bright? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
"c" == chornedsnorkack writes:
c In a robot story of Asimov, the first Jump was done over a distance c of 0,3 MPc. The ship had distance indicator showing distance from c Earth between 0 to 1 MPc. c Assume that you know you have Jumped to somewhere less than 1 MPc c distant, but do NOT have any indicator how far or in which c direction. c How do you find your way within the local group of galaxies? Ill-posed question. What do I have with me? 10-m optical telescope and 100-m radio telescope? How quickly do I want to locate my position? Quickest thing to do might be to locate the M87, 3C 84 (the center galaxy in the Perseus cluster), and a couple of other nearby distinctive sources to use as navigational aids. c There are 2 giant spirals - Milky Way and Andromeda. c If you are somewhere within the disc of Andromeda, which clues c would you have that you are not in a distant part of the disc of c our own Milky Way? c A difference between Milky Way and Andromeda is said to be fewer c young stars in Andromeda - ratio of young stars to old is about 1/5 c to 1/10 that of Milky Way. Yes, but finding stellar ages is a laborious process. You'd have to obtain the spectra of numerous stars, then compare them with isochrones (tracks of constant age) within an HR diagram. Unless one had an array of telescopes, fast computers, and an army of technicians at one's disposal, this could take a while. c Now looking around deep sky... c Milky Way should be a naked eye object in Andromeda, but even c dimmer than Andromeda from Milky Way (which is not bright to begin c with). Easily viewed with even a modest visible light telescope though. c Andromeda is at Milky Way galactic latitude of about 20. Andromeda c is itself oblique to line of sight... what is the angle between c Andromeda disc and direction to Milky Way? It's thought to be about 75 degrees. c Then there are the satellites. Where are the satellites of c Andromeda looking from Andromeda, and how bright are they? c And where is Triangulum? It is closer to Andromeda than Milky Way c (how close?) - where is it looking from Andromeda, and how bright? Have you seen URL: http://www.seds.org/messier/more/local.html and looked at the links off it? An alternate manner of position finding might be to start with a table of positions of major galaxies in the Local Group (Andromeda, Milky Way, Triangulum, probably M32 and the Large Magellanic Cloud). After the Jump, do a quick survey of the sky to see if one can locate these galaxies, then see if one can correlate a possible position within the Local Group with the observed distribution of galaxies. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
How do you find your way within the local group of galaxies?
There are 2 giant spirals - Milky Way and Andromeda. If you are somewhere within the disc of Andromeda, which clues would you have that you are not in a distant part of the disc of our own Milky Way? A difference between Milky Way and Andromeda is said to be fewer young stars in Andromeda - ratio of young stars to old is about 1/5 to 1/10 that of Milky Way. You don't even really need to know that. Just look around the other spiral for M32 and M110; if you don't see them, you must be in M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. Andromeda is at Milky Way galactic latitude of about 20. Andromeda is itself oblique to line of sight... what is the angle between Andromeda disc and direction to Milky Way? Also in the neighborhood of 20 degrees, since it generally appears about three times as long as it is wide. And where is Triangulum? It is closer to Andromeda than Milky Way (how close?) - where is it looking from Andromeda, and how bright? The Triangulum Galaxy (assuming you mean M33), is about 3 million light-years from us, and M31 is about 2.5 million light-years from us. Both distances have significant error bars on them, but assuming they are essentially correct, their angular separation of 15 degrees yields a distance between them of about 750,000 light-years (230,000 parsecs). From M31, it would be about 2.5 magnitudes brighter than it is here (where it has magnitude 5.7), so it would be magnitude 3.2 or so. However, it would have that relatively bright magnitude mostly by virtue of its covering a large amount of sky; magnitudes of extended sources like nearby galaxies often convey a misleading impression of how easy they are to see because they're computed on the basis of all the light coming from the object. M33 can be devilishly difficult to see even from suburban skies because its magnitude 5.7 light is spread out over a comparatively large area. It can be entirely invisible, even through a good-sized telescope, even when magnitude 5.7 *stars* are easily seen. Its brightness per unit area--its so-called "surface brightness"--is a somewhat better measure of how easily it would be seen, and that does not go up as you get closer to the object. As a result: M33 would be easily seen from space (in M31) and from a dark observing site; however, it would be difficult to make out from a hypothetical planet in M31 experiencing substantial light pollution. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
Joseph Lazio kirjutas: "c" == chornedsnorkack writes: c In a robot story of Asimov, the first Jump was done over a distance c of 0,3 MPc. The ship had distance indicator showing distance from c Earth between 0 to 1 MPc. c Assume that you know you have Jumped to somewhere less than 1 MPc c distant, but do NOT have any indicator how far or in which c direction. c How do you find your way within the local group of galaxies? Ill-posed question. What do I have with me? 10-m optical telescope and 100-m radio telescope? How quickly do I want to locate my position? Quickest thing to do might be to locate the M87, 3C 84 (the center galaxy in the Perseus cluster), and a couple of other nearby distinctive sources to use as navigational aids. c There are 2 giant spirals - Milky Way and Andromeda. c If you are somewhere within the disc of Andromeda, which clues c would you have that you are not in a distant part of the disc of c our own Milky Way? c A difference between Milky Way and Andromeda is said to be fewer c young stars in Andromeda - ratio of young stars to old is about 1/5 c to 1/10 that of Milky Way. Yes, but finding stellar ages is a laborious process. You'd have to obtain the spectra of numerous stars, Not necessarily. In young spiral galaxies, most light comes from young heavy stars on main sequence, which are blue and white. Young light stars also exist, but the young heavy stars are much brighter and outshine them. Whereas in Milky Way globular clusters and in elliptical galaxies, young massive stars do not exist, so those bodies consist of individually dim old main sequence light stars, which are yellow or red, and a few brighter old red giants which also are red. Elliptical galaxies are said to be visibly yellow in contrast to bluish-white spirals. Is Andromeda also perceptibly yellower than Milky Way? then compare them with isochrones (tracks of constant age) within an HR diagram. Unless one had an array of telescopes, fast computers, and an army of technicians at one's disposal, this could take a while. c Now looking around deep sky... c Milky Way should be a naked eye object in Andromeda, but even c dimmer than Andromeda from Milky Way (which is not bright to begin c with). Easily viewed with even a modest visible light telescope though. c Andromeda is at Milky Way galactic latitude of about 20. Andromeda c is itself oblique to line of sight... what is the angle between c Andromeda disc and direction to Milky Way? It's thought to be about 75 degrees. c Then there are the satellites. Where are the satellites of c Andromeda looking from Andromeda, and how bright are they? c And where is Triangulum? It is closer to Andromeda than Milky Way c (how close?) - where is it looking from Andromeda, and how bright? Have you seen URL: http://www.seds.org/messier/more/local.html and looked at the links off it? An alternate manner of position finding might be to start with a table of positions of major galaxies in the Local Group (Andromeda, Milky Way, Triangulum, probably M32 and the Large Magellanic Cloud). After the Jump, do a quick survey of the sky to see if one can locate these galaxies, then see if one can correlate a possible position within the Local Group with the observed distribution of galaxies. Or rather - survey the sky to locate what nebulae exist in the sky, then see if any of them can be identified as known major galaxies. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
Not necessarily. In young spiral galaxies, most light comes from young
heavy stars on main sequence, which are blue and white. Young light stars also exist, but the young heavy stars are much brighter and outshine them. Whereas in Milky Way globular clusters and in elliptical galaxies, young massive stars do not exist, so those bodies consist of individually dim old main sequence light stars, which are yellow or red, and a few brighter old red giants which also are red. Elliptical galaxies are said to be visibly yellow in contrast to bluish-white spirals. Is Andromeda also perceptibly yellower than Milky Way? The principle is valid, yes, but I don't think M31 is significantly different in color from the Milky Way. I suspect you could measure a difference, but as I said in my earlier post, there doesn't seem to be much point, since you can just look for M31's two prominent satellite galaxies around the other galaxy. If they're there, you're in the Milky Way; if they're not, you're in M31. Incidentally, I have an essay on finding your way through the Milky Way at http://astro.isi.edu/games/dimension.html which may be of some relevance. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
Brian Tung kirjutas: How do you find your way within the local group of galaxies? There are 2 giant spirals - Milky Way and Andromeda. If you are somewhere within the disc of Andromeda, which clues would you have that you are not in a distant part of the disc of our own Milky Way? A difference between Milky Way and Andromeda is said to be fewer young stars in Andromeda - ratio of young stars to old is about 1/5 to 1/10 that of Milky Way. You don't even really need to know that. Just look around the other spiral for M32 and M110; if you don't see them, you must be in M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. Where IS M32? It is between Milky Way and Andromeda. Does anyone have a clue of how far M32 is from Andromeda? Looking from Andromeda, Milky Way should be behind and seen through M32... what does it look like? Andromeda is at Milky Way galactic latitude of about 20. Andromeda is itself oblique to line of sight... what is the angle between Andromeda disc and direction to Milky Way? Also in the neighborhood of 20 degrees, since it generally appears about three times as long as it is wide. And where is Triangulum? It is closer to Andromeda than Milky Way (how close?) - where is it looking from Andromeda, and how bright? The Triangulum Galaxy (assuming you mean M33), is about 3 million light-years from us, and M31 is about 2.5 million light-years from us. Both distances have significant error bars on them, Exactly. The distance from Andromeda to M33 includes the difference between two similar values that are both rather imprecise. but assuming they are essentially correct, their angular separation of 15 degrees yields a distance between them of about 750,000 light-years (230,000 parsecs). From M31, it would be about 2.5 magnitudes brighter than it is here (where it has magnitude 5.7), so it would be magnitude 3.2 or so. However, it would have that relatively bright magnitude mostly by virtue of its covering a large amount of sky; magnitudes of extended sources like nearby galaxies often convey a misleading impression of how easy they are to see because they're computed on the basis of all the light coming from the object. M33 can be devilishly difficult to see even from suburban skies because its magnitude 5.7 light is spread out over a comparatively large area. It can be entirely invisible, even through a good-sized telescope, even when magnitude 5.7 *stars* are easily seen. Its brightness per unit area--its so-called "surface brightness"--is a somewhat better measure of how easily it would be seen, and that does not go up as you get closer to the object. Does anyone know where the plane of M33 is? Milky Way is far from that plane, but how far? Are the Milky Way and Andromeda visible exclusively because we happen to be inside the plane of one and near the plane of the other? And would they vanish from sight if viewed from higher galactic latitudes? As a result: M33 would be easily seen from space (in M31) and from a dark observing site; however, it would be difficult to make out from a hypothetical planet in M31 experiencing substantial light pollution. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
Brian Tung kirjutas: Not necessarily. In young spiral galaxies, most light comes from young heavy stars on main sequence, which are blue and white. Young light stars also exist, but the young heavy stars are much brighter and outshine them. Whereas in Milky Way globular clusters and in elliptical galaxies, young massive stars do not exist, so those bodies consist of individually dim old main sequence light stars, which are yellow or red, and a few brighter old red giants which also are red. Elliptical galaxies are said to be visibly yellow in contrast to bluish-white spirals. Is Andromeda also perceptibly yellower than Milky Way? The principle is valid, yes, but I don't think M31 is significantly different in color from the Milky Way. I suspect you could measure a difference, but as I said in my earlier post, there doesn't seem to be much point, since you can just look for M31's two prominent satellite galaxies around the other galaxy. If you find and manage to identify "the other galaxy". The two brightest galaxies seen from Milky Way are the Magellanic Clouds. The Large Magellanic Cloud is by far brighter than Andromeda, and the Small Magellanic Cloud is also significantly brighter. Large Magellanic Cloud is also intrinsically the brightest galaxy in Local Group after the three of Andromeda, Milky Way and Triangulum. It is intrinsically significantly brighter than either M32 or M110. So, looking from Andromeda, the Large Magellanic Cloud should be far more prominent than M32 or M110 looking from Milky Way. If they're there, you're in the Milky Way; if they're not, you're in M31. Incidentally, I have an essay on finding your way through the Milky Way at http://astro.isi.edu/games/dimension.html which may be of some relevance. And several points where I would do things differently. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Identifying galaxies within 1 MPc
Where IS M32?
It is between Milky Way and Andromeda. Does anyone have a clue of how far M32 is from Andromeda? It's unclear that it lies between us and M31. We don't know its distance precisely enough. It's possible that kinematics would tell us where it is in relation to M31, but I'm not aware of any reliable results. Looking from Andromeda, Milky Way should be behind and seen through M32... what does it look like? No, the Milky Way would not be seen through M32, unless you are in the correct outskirts of M31--the part of M31 that is behind M32 as seen from our vantage point. From all other vantage points in M31 (most of them, in other words), the Milky Way might seem close to M32 in the sky, but it would not appear actually behind it. Does anyone know where the plane of M33 is? Milky Way is far from that plane, but how far? M33 is about twice as long as it is wide, so a guess would be that the Milky Way is 30 degrees off M33's galactic plane. Are the Milky Way and Andromeda visible exclusively because we happen to be inside the plane of one and near the plane of the other? And would they vanish from sight if viewed from higher galactic latitudes? No, if anything, they would appear easier to see. Google "zone of avoidance" and galaxy. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help identifying DSO | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | December 25th 05 06:22 PM |
Identifying 'W' | Dave B | UK Astronomy | 7 | October 3rd 05 08:05 AM |
Help identifying something | Nerull | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | December 5th 04 09:28 AM |
Help identifying | Pete Lawrence | UK Astronomy | 13 | August 20th 04 11:24 PM |
satellite identifying | Don Baker | Misc | 0 | July 8th 03 01:41 PM |