|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Axiom of Simultaneity (was Speed of light)
"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:36:43 -0700 (PDT), Ron-boy wrote: On Aug 7, 8:56 pm, papa-r wrote: (snip) For sure you have not read the very document you cite. At the end Einstein writes: Here are the steps in this story: A conflict definitely existed at the start - indeed, it was the *cause* of special relativity. 1. Light's speed through space is constant (fixed) (due to its source independency). (this is what Einstein called the law of propagation of light - it says simply that the absolute speed of light in space is always the same) 2. Given the truly or absolutely synchronous clocks of classical physics, light's one-way measured speed will vary with frame velocity. (Einstein's c - v) 3. Einstein falsely believed that this one-way variance violated the PR. (but, as I carefully explained, it does not because the GENERAL law is the SAME for all inertial observers, namely, c ± v.) (this was Einstein's *perceived* conflict) 4. Therefore, Einstein - in order to "save" the PR - was "forced" to ABANDON (discard, toss out, trash) the truly synchronous clocks of classical physics. (Einstein wrote is this way (paraphrased from above): "If we discard absolute time, then the conflict can be removed.") (Einstein then had to replace true clocks with his asynchronous clocks - differently asynchronous in each frame in order to yield "c" in each frame.) 5. However, there was never any conflict with the PR, so there was never any need to toss out truly synchronous clocks. It borders on insanity to toss out truly synchronous clocks, and to deliberately replace them with asynchronous ones. SR, what a concept! No need for all this..... The error lies in the early part of Einstein's 1905 paper, where he initially provides a definition of clock synchronization and then uses it to develop his relativity of simultaneity theory. ========================================= No need for all that, the Axiom of Simultaneity (copyright Lord Androcles 2000) is "A meets B when B meet A", whether A and B are massive bodies or photons or light signals or bright green flying elephant's eggs in the Easter Bunny's nest. It is manifestly impossible for B to meet A before or after A meets B. Lemma I: Let A meet B at C, then by the Axiom of Simultaneity (which you, Daisy Rabbidge, have my permission to quote but Dork does not because I reserve copyright) A meets C at B, B meets A at C, B meets C at A, C meets B at A and C meets A at B. Let A and B be twins and C be a sundial on Earth. Due to time dilation A meets C at dawn (where dawn is defined as the sun's rays meeting the sundial and casting a shadow), B meets C at noon (similarly defined ) and A does not meet B at C in violation of the Axiom of Simultaneity (copyright Lord Androcles 2000) . The AoS (copyright Lord Androcles 2000) takes precedence over any imagined RoS and is the basis of Newton's absolute time, which Newton overlooked, which is surprising for a great mathematician. I, Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway, have amended Newton. Where is my Fields Medal? (You can keep any Nobel crap). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal The Fields Medal, officially known as International Medal for Outstanding Discoveries in Mathematics, is a prize awarded to two, three, or four mathematicians not over 40 years of age at each International Congress of the International Mathematical Union (IMU), a meeting that takes place every four years. Oh wait, I'm over 40 years of age... I'll have to time dilate myself to get it. Looks like I'm **** out of luck again, I just proved I can't. I'll have to glory in my self-awarded title instead. Like Usain Bolt, I am the greatest! -- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The Axiom of Simultaneity (was Speed of light)
You may be interested to know that simultaneity is only relative -
only subject to opinion depending on one's frame of reference - in the Special Theory of Relativity (and the General one too, for that matter) for things that are not in the same place. When two events take place at the same location, simultaneity is unambiguous and fully transitive - and, thus, your "Axiom of Simultaneity" has been part of Relativity all along and in no way disproves it. John Savard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Axiom of Simultaneity (was Speed of light)
"Quadibloc" wrote in message ... You may be interested to know that simultaneity is only relative ================================================== ================== You will probably be uninterested to know you are more stupid than Kelleher who doesn't read a word of what you say but charges on with his own beliefs. Naturally I'll do the same to you, you snipping bigot. The Axiom of Simultaneity (copyright Lord Androcles 2000) is "A meets B when B meet A", whether A and B are massive bodies or photons or light signals or bright green flying elephant's eggs in the Easter Bunny's nest. It is manifestly impossible for B to meet A before or after A meets B. Lemma I: Let A meet B at C, then by the Axiom of Simultaneity (which you, Daisy Rabbidge, have my permission to quote but Dork does not because I reserve copyright) A meets C at B, B meets A at C, B meets C at A, C meets B at A and C meets A at B. Let A and B be twins and C be a sundial on Earth. Due to time dilation A meets C at dawn (where dawn is defined as the sun's rays meeting the sundial and casting a shadow), B meets C at noon (similarly defined ) and A does not meet B at C in violation of the Axiom of Simultaneity (copyright Lord Androcles 2000) . The AoS (copyright Lord Androcles 2000) takes precedence over any imagined RoS and is the basis of Newton's absolute time, which Newton overlooked, which is surprising for a great mathematician. I, Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway, have amended Newton. Where is my Fields Medal? (You can keep any Nobel crap). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal The Fields Medal, officially known as International Medal for Outstanding Discoveries in Mathematics, is a prize awarded to two, three, or four mathematicians not over 40 years of age at each International Congress of the International Mathematical Union (IMU), a meeting that takes place every four years. Oh wait, I'm over 40 years of age... I'll have to time dilate myself to get it. Looks like I'm **** out of luck again, I just proved I can't. I'll have to glory in my self-awarded title instead. Like Usain Bolt, I am the greatest! -- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARIES WITH THE SPEED OF THE OBSERVER | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | March 3rd 12 09:55 AM |
Speed of individual photons cannot exceed speed of light in a vacuum | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 78 | August 11th 11 06:30 PM |
Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light??? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 12:48 AM |
Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed. | [email protected] | Misc | 20 | September 4th 06 06:34 PM |
parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299 thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions | Roger Wilco | Misc | 1 | December 30th 03 10:15 PM |