|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Yes Quadibloc, the Earth does precess around Amy.
In article , Androcles wrote: Now comes the difficult part. We are not back to where we started, Earth's orbit is elliptical and its perihelion precesses. So at some point in its prehistory, perihelion and the equinox coincided and then at a later (or earlier) time the longest/shortest day of the year (depending on the hemisphere you choose to live in) coincided with perihelion. The question: what effect do these combined precessions have on climate? This may help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsidal...g-term_climate Apparently this is one of the many elements of motion that go into figuring the Milankovitch cycles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles -- "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither." |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Yes Quadibloc, the Earth does precess around Amy.
"Paul Ciszek" wrote in message ... In article , Androcles wrote: Now comes the difficult part. We are not back to where we started, Earth's orbit is elliptical and its perihelion precesses. So at some point in its prehistory, perihelion and the equinox coincided and then at a later (or earlier) time the longest/shortest day of the year (depending on the hemisphere you choose to live in) coincided with perihelion. The question: what effect do these combined precessions have on climate? This may help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsidal...g-term_climate ================================================== ====== It doesn't, I'm not concerned about Mercury's climate and the garbage about GR is hearsay from a crackpot too stupid to to see all of the GR calculation lies within the error bound of Le Verrier's calculation based on Newtonian Mechanics. 43 arc seconds per century is 43 arc seconds in 415 orbits or 43: 415 * 360 degrees * 60 arc minutes * 60 arc seconds = EXACTLY 1 part in 12,507,907 which the cretin Einstein with his trusty slip stick, his booklet of 4 figure log tables and his wooden telescope that he gazed at Mercury with for 100 years was completely incapable of figuring, thus rendering anything in wackypedia of any astronomical significance as hyperbole and lies. Apparently this is one of the many elements of motion that go into figuring the Milankovitch cycles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles ================================================ The motive behind my question was to question the authenticity AGW, as Quadiblockhead guessed. -- "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither." ============================================= No? Perhaps you have a short memory. Edmund Burke remembers it very well and so do I. "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -- Edmund Burke As Quadiblockhead is one of the evil rumour-mongering purveyors of AGW it is my duty as a good man to do something. Hopefully my goodness has reached you and others like you and you too will do something, or you'll lose all of your 401K and spill oil in a different body of water the same way you used chemical warfare on Vietnam with Agent Orange dioxins by doing nothing. The first thing you should do is hack into the Pentagon's computers and find out what the baby kissing *******s you voted for are planning next, or at least support Julian Assange's Wikileaks and spit on wackypedia's propaganda. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/nat...-1226447218873 |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Yes Quadibloc, the Earth does precess around Amy.
On Aug 10, 3:04*pm, (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
In article , Androcles wrote: Now comes the difficult part. We are not back to where we started, Earth's orbit is elliptical and its perihelion precesses. So at some point in its prehistory, perihelion and the equinox coincided and then at a later (or earlier) time the longest/shortest day of the year (depending on the hemisphere you choose to live in) coincided with perihelion. The question: what effect do these combined precessions have on climate? This may help:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsidal...g-term_climate You people crack me up sometimes as you all go into assertion warfare with each other without the slightest restraint and probably knowing each other,chant voodoo at precession.I have news for you,the Earth's polar coordinates turn 360 degrees in a circle to the central Sun each orbital circuit which is why they have the polar day/night cycle and a location that acts like a beacon for all other locations on Earth .Precession of the Equinoxes is therefore an orbital trait and not an axial one and unfortunately the standard is just not there to recognize it. Unlike contemporaries I love what my astronomical ancestors did when they marked the solstices at the same orbital point as these 5000 year old monuments still do today and mock people who now call themselves astronomers but are not.With so much vandalism wrought by the late 17th century guys,at least unintentionally lunging at a conclusion based on stellar circumpolar motion,you are unlikely to appreciate that almost 20% into the precession of the equinoxes,the ancient monuments still hold their alignments just as they always have - http://www.knowth.com/winter-solstice.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge Have a ball flailing around with assertions with no direction or meaning,you could not keep the company of those astronomers in antiquity,that is not an insult but an unfortunate fact - no shame,no embarrassment,just another drone with no thought to an astronomical history or heritage. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sped up the Earth’s rotation and tipped the planet’s axis | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 42 | March 12th 10 10:02 PM |
Fixed-axis Assumptions are Overly Earth-centric | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 6th 08 02:56 AM |
On-axis, off-axis, and neutral axis light | Tenifer | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | November 15th 07 04:02 AM |
Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | November 27th 05 08:01 PM |
Orion EQ-3M drves: single axis or double axis? | Jon Isaacs | Amateur Astronomy | 29 | February 6th 04 11:58 AM |