A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Weight and detecting change or creation of motion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 8th 08, 08:37 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion

Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch
  #2  
Old May 8th 08, 09:27 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Ralph Hertle[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion

wrote:
Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch





Mitch:

That is an example of scientific word salad. What you say means
absolutely nothing.

In classic Post Modernist style you also fail to include precise
definitions at the top of your monolog.

Unless, of course, your goal is to integrate as many fallacies of
logic together in the same sentences as is possible. You writing
includes the fallacies of post hoc ergo propter hoc, non-seqitur,
failure to identify objective facts of existents, context
switching [+/-], unsubstantiated assertions, and meaningless
undefined terms. The grammar is so discontinuous of logical
method that it is difficult to clearly identify the fallacies of
distribution.

Even the one or two things that you have previously written, and
that seem to be true, must be discounted as mere arbitrary
assertions because of your failure to substantiate what you say
with contextual definitions, and with empirically identified facts.

Ralph Hertle

..
  #3  
Old May 8th 08, 09:32 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Ralph Hertle[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion

wrote:
Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch





Mitch:

That is an example of scientific word salad. What you say means
absolutely nothing.

In classic Post Modernist style you also fail to include precise
definitions at the top of your monolog.

Unless, of course, your goal is to integrate as many fallacies of
logic together in the same sentences as is possible. You writing
includes the fallacies of post hoc ergo propter hoc, non-seqitur,
failure to identify objective facts of existents, context
switching [+/-], unsubstantiated assertions, and meaningless
undefined terms. The grammar is so discontinuous of logical
method that it is difficult to clearly identify the fallacies of
distribution.

Even the one or two things that you have previously written, and
that seem to be true, must be discounted as mere arbitrary
assertions because of your failure to substantiate what you say
with contextual definitions, and with empirically identified facts.

Ralph Hertle

..
  #4  
Old May 8th 08, 09:56 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 697
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion

wrote:

Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.

Mitch Raemsch


Hey ****ing stooopid:

http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
Dunning-Kruger effect (2000 Ig Nobel Prize): ignorance more
frequently begets confidence than does knowledge

1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of
skill.
2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in
others.
3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their
inadequacy.

http://www.meninhats.com/d/20040430.html
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
  #5  
Old May 8th 08, 11:18 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Peter Webb[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion


wrote in message
...
Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.

Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.



Hardly. You could be in orbit and use your motor to accelerate away from the
earth, or to declelerate and crash into the earth. In both cases, the same
"weight" would be measured inside the space craft, despite the actual
courses being completely different.


Mitch Raemsch


  #6  
Old May 8th 08, 11:59 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion

On May 8, 2:18*pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
wrote in message

...

Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.


Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.


Hardly. You could be in orbit and use your motor to accelerate away from the
earth, or to declelerate and crash into the earth. In both cases, the same
"weight" would be measured inside the space craft, despite the actual
courses being completely different.


I don't believe that concludes your case. Show the math for that.
I am not talking about the gravitational field. I am speaking of
change of motion gravity alone. It is always detectable.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008


Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Change of motion or acceleration is detectable
  #7  
Old May 10th 08, 10:21 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Google Is Spam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion


"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
wrote:

1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of
skill.
2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in
others.
3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their
inadequacy.


look in the mirror


  #8  
Old May 10th 08, 11:53 PM posted to rec.org.mensa,alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default Weight and detecting change or creation of motion

On May 8, 2:59*pm, wrote:
On May 8, 2:18*pm, "Peter Webb"
wrote:





wrote in message


...


Motion is created by acceleration and canceled by deceleration. All
motion is not relative. When the space ship takes off to measure its
absolute motion only a scale and a clock are required. By measuring
weight fluctuation one can calculate your acceleration and the end
speed you have attained.


Motion gravity by measured weight flucuation gives you your absolute
motion through space without reference to anything external.


Hardly. You could be in orbit and use your motor to accelerate away from the
earth, or to declelerate and crash into the earth. In both cases, the same
"weight" would be measured inside the space craft, despite the actual
courses being completely different.


I don't believe that concludes your case. Show the math for that.
I am not talking about the gravitational field. I am speaking of
change of motion gravity alone. It is always detectable.

Mitch Raemsch; Twice Nobel Laureate 2008



Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Change of motion or acceleration is detectable- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


The creation of new motion is detectable.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fast Spin=Weight Fast acceleration=Weight Motion=Gravity etc. G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 0 December 11th 06 11:45 AM
Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion kenseto Astronomy Misc 3 September 19th 06 04:49 AM
Change in meaning of "inertial motion" in Newton to Einstein Ken S. Tucker Astronomy Misc 13 December 12th 04 09:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.