Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and

Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as
Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear
Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing
about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
100 Years Of E=mc2.
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

An open letter to Dr Alexander Inpain as he introduced on Wrap Forum.
What you got in Cheating and Misusing Name of CERN ?
www.cern.ch
Part I
In previous many posts on Special Relativity Forum you introduced
yourself as Dr Alexander Inpain who working at CERN and running Nuclear
Reactors.

Also your reply showed that you are an administrators and post my
replies on the Notice Boards of the CERN.
So I gave lot of weightage to yours comments, which were absolutely
unscientific.
So , I could not assess how a person with SUCH POOR KNOWLEDGE can be at
CERN?
It became clear when I inquired from CERN regarding it.
So you CHEATED scientific community on the WHOLE. It is matter of
shame.
ON 28 Sep I got letter from Head Physics Dept., Dr Jean-Jacques
Blaising ( pasted below).

Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:30 +0200
From: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Add to
Address Book Add Mobile Alert

To: "ajay sharma"
CC: "Jean-Jacques Blaising"

Dear Mrs Sharma,
Mr Inpain is not a member of the the CERN personnel and is not
registered at CERN as a scientific associate.
Regards,
Jean-Jacques Blaising


That you are not associated with CERN with any capacity.
So you are a liar WHO WILL BELIEVE YOU.
You have cheated the scientific community.


Part II
You don’t deserve the reply , but let me add.
However I am posting this reply on various Internet Groups for
information.
You have posted some links
Un moderated Internet Groups has NO scientific validity.
Even a child knows this; it is merely a forums for interactions.
My work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW.

I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it
originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com

See how links given by you are scientifically MEANINGLESS..

http://groups.google.com/group/epist...7b3f49b8974b7a
It has nothing to do with my work.
http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf
This link is without Name and Place.
100s times I asked ( see numerous posts ,
sci.physics.relativity) on google group that put your name and address
in it.
But it was not put. How can you believe a person who cannot put his
name and address on the post? Apparently he is also like your elder
brother.
So EVERYTHING IS CLEAR. Only persons like you can give importance to
this
Even then if you put angle phi 89 then it SUPPORS my work . The end
result is the same.
It is incomplete in the sense that final numerical values are not
calculated.
Further
http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdis...or=macactupapi


This link shows the lack of UNDERSTADING of 11th Class Physics i.e.
application of Conservation of Momentum. What I can do? I can advise to
read 11th class book.
Earlier it was big NOTE by some UNKNOWN but now cut to Half.
However this author has promised me long back that author will
contradict me in PHYSICS ESSAYS. But the promise is not kept.

Part III

MY WORK IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, FLAWLESS.
Author/Editors/Publishers/Referees is all correct
Still there ANYONE is welcome to contradict the work in Physics Essays
giving the facts e.g.
What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharma’s apper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
There are thousands of link to my work on the internet. All the
references are given below for the purpose.

Part IV
References.

References of Einstein’s work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma’s work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
�The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation �E = Ac2 �M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology�.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
�The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation �E = Ac2 �M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology�.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

Ajay Sharma Email 1st October
2006

AJAY SHARMA wrote:

I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it
originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com

The problem is that there are SO MANY people that contradict you and so
much research done by SO MANY other researchers that contradicts your
work that it would be difficult to provide such a list. Please start
5th and 6th level maths and physics and work your way up to university
level work. Once you get there read the basic papers in the field. You
have PUBLISHED NOTHING

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as
Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear
Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing
about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
100 Years Of E=mc2.


Mr. Ajay Sharma has produced a fraudulent paper in which he claims to
have "completed" Einstein's work.
In reality, "100 years of E=mc2" is nothing but a collection of errors.

Mr. Ajay Sharma simply mistakes the trivial change in a system's
momentum for a n "increase in mass". Mr Ajay Sharma perpetrates the
same gross mistakes over 28 pages of torture replete with
misunderstandings, errors and slanders to Einstein's work.
Mr.Sharma is attempting to convince the reader that he has found errors
in Einstein's work (there aren't any) and that he is "completing"
Einstein's "unfinished " work. In reality, Einstein's work is correct
and complete while Ajay Sharma's is full with elementary errors.
The tone of the paper is as arrogant as it is ignorant, Ajay Sharma
simply does not understand one of the basic laws of physics: the law of
conservation of momentum which is conspicously absent from his
so-called "discovery"

Ajay Sharma paper "100 Years of E=Mc2" turns out to be a hoax.

AJAY SHARMA wrote:


Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN

You took seriously a play on words. Meaning the author is IN PAIN and
works at CERN

wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:

I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it
originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com

The problem is that there are SO MANY people that contradict you and so
much research done by SO MANY other researchers that contradicts your
work that it would be difficult to provide such a list. Please start
5th and 6th level maths and physics and work your way up to university
level work. Once you get there read the basic papers in the field. You
have PUBLISHED NOTHING
-------------------------------------------------
---------AJAY SHARMA responds----------------
Only a cheat can defend the cheat.
WHAT IS THE TITLE OF THIS POST ?
If it is official and correct and Email ID then I will conctact you on
this.
Comments on Unmoderated Intenet Group , have no meaning.
Whatever cannot be said on the face can be said on internet , beacuase
there is no responsibility.

I will welcome anyone to contradict the wwork in the Physics Essays
(where originally my work is published)
www.physicsessays.com
For this I give the list of my publications again below.
References.

References of Einstein’s work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharma’s work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
�The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation �E = Ac2 �M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology�.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
�The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation �E = Ac2 �M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology�.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

AJAY SHARMA

wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as
Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear
Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing
about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
100 Years Of E=mc2.


Mr. Ajay Sharma has produced a fraudulent paper in which he claims to
have "completed" Einstein's work.
In reality, "100 years of E=mc2" is nothing but a collection of errors.

Mr. Ajay Sharma simply mistakes the trivial change in a system's
momentum for a n "increase in mass". Mr Ajay Sharma perpetrates the
same gross mistakes over 28 pages of torture replete with
misunderstandings, errors and slanders to Einstein's work.
Mr.Sharma is attempting to convince the reader that he has found errors
in Einstein's work (there aren't any) and that he is "completing"
Einstein's "unfinished " work. In reality, Einstein's work is correct
and complete while Ajay Sharma's is full with elementary errors.
The tone of the paper is as arrogant as it is ignorant, Ajay Sharma
simply does not understand one of the basic laws of physics: the law of
conservation of momentum which is conspicously absent from his
so-called "discovery"

Ajay Sharma paper "100 Years of E=Mc2" turns out to be a hoax.

AJAY SHARMA wrote:

Comments on Unmoderated Intenet Group , have no meaning.

Thank you for finally acknowledging that. Will you now stop commenting?

--
St. John
You are not a fool just because you have done something foolish --
only if the folly of it escapes you.

wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:


Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN

You took seriously a play on words. Meaning the author is IN PAIN and
works at CERN
--------------------------
Dr Alexander Inpain wrote that he is at CERN.
He runs nuclears reactors and puts my posts on the notice board.
Thus I took his posts seriously.
But Head, TP has written he not at all associated with CERN.

AJAY SHARMA

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:


Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN

You took seriously a play on words. Meaning the author is IN PAIN and
works at CERN
--------------------------
Dr Alexander Inpain wrote that he is at CERN.
He runs nuclears reactors and puts my posts on the notice board.
Thus I took his posts seriously.
But Head, TP has written he not at all associated with CERN.

AJAY SHARMA


More likely Dr. Alexander who is IN PAIN at (@) CERN


You are just too stupid to recognize it.

wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:
wrote:
AJAY SHARMA wrote:


Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN

You took seriously a play on words. Meaning the author is IN PAIN and
works at CERN
--------------------------
Dr Alexander Inpain wrote that he is at CERN.
He runs nuclears reactors and puts my posts on the notice board.
Thus I took his posts seriously.
But Head, TP has written he not at all associated with CERN.

AJAY SHARMA


More likely Dr. Alexander who is IN PAIN at (@) CERN


You are just too stupid to recognize it.

-------
Write clearly whatever you want.
Ajay Sharma