A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Astro Pictures
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NGC 90 Or What Squashed This Galaxy?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 14th 16, 07:14 AM
WA0CKY WA0CKY is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default NGC 95 Or What Squashed This Galaxy?

NGC 95 is a very peculiar galaxy in Pisces some 230 million light-years distant by red-shift. Tully-Fisher estimates put it close at 190 million light-years using the mean value but they range from 170 to 230 million light-years. The galaxy has a very triangular shape with plumes to the east and west. My wife says it looks like it was flattened by someone stepping on it and spilling guts to the side. Something seems to have disturbed it but I doubt it was a big foot. The arm structure is very odd. It has mostly short faint arm segments coming from a very bright core that run rather directly to the edge which is ringed in HII star forming regions. One arm coming around the west (right) side is stronger and rather red. As it reaches the edge it appears to turn blue and looping back along the edge until it meets another arm on the northeast which carries the illusion of a loop back to the core. Rather than being real I think this an illusion due to the location of the HII regions but they could indicate something odd going on. The shape and plumes would indicate interaction with something, possibly something it is digesting. NED, The NGC project and Seligman all classify it as SAB(rs)c pec. Though Seligman adds a question mark after the "c". It was discovered by William Herschel on October 18, 1784. It isn't listed in either of the Herschel 400 observing programs. I measure its size at 120,000 light-years though Seligman says 125,000 but they put it slightly more distant (250 million light-years) which accounts for the size difference.

The only other galaxy with red-shift data in the field is the flat galaxy FGC 036. It has virtually the same red-shift as NGC 95 putting it at 230 million light-years though Tully Fisher measurements say 250 million. Since it is about half the angular size of NGC 95 it is half its size or about 60,000 light-years. NED says it is classified as an Sd galaxy.

One faint asteroid appears in the image half way between NGC 95 and the lower right corner. It is (255371) 2005 WW111. It is estimated by the Minor Planet Center at magnitude 19.4 but appears much fainter in my image. This is likely due to the poor transparency and high sky brightness due to aurora the night I took this data. Due to the poor conditions I tried another night but while transparency was better seeing was far worse so I went back and used the first night's data. There's a second 20.5 magnitude asteroid in the image but it is so faint it didn't survive my processing. I probably should have tried yet again but never did. The aurora played havoc with my color balance. I hope I compensated. I think it fairly close at least. With so little in the image I didn't post an annotated image.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	NGC0095L4X10RGB2X10.JPG
Views:	393
Size:	230.4 KB
ID:	6100  Click image for larger version

Name:	NGC0095L4X10RGB2X10CROP125.JPG
Views:	218
Size:	90.5 KB
ID:	6101  

Last edited by WA0CKY : February 15th 16 at 07:16 AM.
  #2  
Old February 18th 16, 08:46 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
Stefan Lilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,269
Default NGC 90 Or What Squashed This Galaxy?

Amazing detail for such a small galaxy.
It reminded me a bit of NGC 3938, but upon closer inspection the outer rim
of NGC 90 is much brighter than in NGC 3938.

Stefan


"WA0CKY" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ...


NGC 95 is a very peculiar galaxy in Pisces some 230 million light-years
distant by red-shift. Tully-Fisher estimates put it close at 190
million light-years using the mean value but they range from 170 to 230
million light-years. The galaxy has a very triangular shape with plumes
to the east and west. My wife says it looks like it was flattened by
someone stepping on it and spilling guts to the side. Something seems
to have disturbed it but I doubt it was a big foot. The arm structure
is very odd. It has mostly short faint arm segments coming from a very
bright core that run rather directly to the edge which is ringed in HII
star forming regions. One arm coming around the west (right) side is
stronger and rather red. As it reaches the edge it appears to turn blue
and looping back along the edge until it meets another arm on the
northeast which carries the illusion of a loop back to the core. Rather
than being real I think this an illusion due to the location of the HII
regions but they could indicate something odd going on. The shape and
plumes would indicate interaction with something, possibly something it
is digesting. NED, The NGC project and Seligman all classify it as
SAB(rs)c pec. Though Seligman adds a question mark after the "c". It
was discovered by William Herschel on October 18, 1784. It isn't listed
in either of the Herschel 400 observing programs. I measure its size at
120,000 light-years though Seligman says 125,000 but they put it
slightly more distant (250 million light-years) which accounts for the
size difference.

The only other galaxy with red-shift data in the field is the flat
galaxy FGC 036. It has virtually the same red-shift as NGC 95 putting
it at 230 million light-years though Tully Fisher measurements say 250
million. Since it is about half the angular size of NGC 95 it is half
its size or about 60,000 light-years. NED says it is classified as an
Sd galaxy.

One faint asteroid appears in the image half way between NGC 95 and the
lower right corner. It is (255371) 2005 WW111. It is estimated by the
Minor Planet Center at magnitude 19.4 but appears much fainter in my
image. This is likely due to the poor transparency and high sky
brightness due to aurora the night I took this data. Due to the poor
conditions I tried another night but while transparency was better
seeing was far worse so I went back and used the first night's data.
There's a second 20.5 magnitude asteroid in the image but it is so faint
it didn't survive my processing. I probably should have tried yet again
but never did. The aurora played havoc with my color balance. I hope I
compensated. I think it fairly close at least. With so little in the
image I didn't post an annotated image.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick


--
WA0CKY

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy signifiespost Amateur Astronomy 9 June 22nd 12 07:10 AM
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy signifiespost Policy 12 June 14th 12 06:55 AM
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy signifiespost Space Science Misc 0 June 13th 12 02:22 AM
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy signifiespost Astronomy Misc 0 June 9th 12 04:56 AM
Galaxy Seen Colliding with Invisible Dark Matter Galaxy! Double-A[_1_] Misc 0 June 17th 07 12:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.